Performance of Children with Typical Development When Reading and Interpreting Graphic-Symbol Sequences^*

References

• Alant, E., du Plooy, A., & Dada, S. (2007). The impact of visual sequencing of graphic symbols on the sentence construction output of children who have acquired language. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 54, 105–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton, A., Sevcik, R., & Romski, M. (2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (1989). Customizing a Minspeak system for a preliterate child: A case example. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peaboby [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. Toronto, Canada: Psycan.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. (1997). Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisawa, K., Inoue, T., Yamana, Y.Hayashi, H. (2011). The effect of animation on learning action symbols by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerken, L. (2009). Language development. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Geytenbeek, J., Heim, M., Vermeulen, J.Oostrom, K. (2010). Assessing comprehension of spoken language in nonspeaking children with cerebral palsy: Application of a newly developed computer-based instrument. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hehner, B. (1980). Blissymbols for use. Toronto: Blissymbol Communication International.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols combination book. Solano Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Mineo, B., Peischl, D.PenningtonC. 2008 Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam, R., Schlosser, R.Lloyd, L. (2006). Concomitant use of the matrix strategy and the mand-model procedure in teaching graphic symbol combinations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 160–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond, S.Johnston, S. (2001). Evaluating the morphological competence of children with severe speech and physical impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 1362–1375.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M.Sevcik, R. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik. R., Adamson, L., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R.Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Lloyd, L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a story-telling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 979–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevcik, R., & Romski, M. A. (2002). The role of language comprehension in establishing early augmented conversations. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing an augmentative communication system: Exemplary strategies for beginning communicators (pp. 453–474). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, T.Haaf, R. (1995). Comparison of two training methods in the learning and generalization of Blissymbolics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 154–164.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1978). Handbook of Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. Grove, N. C. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice. (pp. 163–198). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A.Gallagher, T. (1995). Comprehension assessment of a child using an AAC system: A comparison of two techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A.Morford, J. P. (1998). Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M. N.Poirier, M.-A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Cleave, P. L.Woelk, E. J. (2003). Using augmentative and alternative communication approaches to promote participation of preschoolers during book reading: A pilot study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 181–210.
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Morford, J. P.Sutton, A. (2010). The role of word order in the interpretation of canonical and non-canonical graphic symbol utterances: A developmental study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 108–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S.Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The impact of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. Martinsen, H. (1996). Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication (2nd edn). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., Romski, M.Sevcik, R. (1994). Emergence of visual graphic symbol combinations by youth with moderate or severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 883–895.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar