References
- Blackstone, S. W. (2007). For consumers: Using digitized SGDs. Augmentative Communication News, 19, 1–4.
- Coplan, J., & Gleason, J. R. (1988). Unclear speech: Recognition and significance of unintelligible speech in preschool children. Pediatrics, 82, 447–452.
- Drager, K. D. R., Clark-Serpentine, E. A., Johnson, K. E., & Roeser, J. L. (2006). Accuracy of repetition of digitized and synthesized speech for young children in background noise. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 155–164.
- Drager, K., Ende, E., Harper, E., Iapalucci, M., & Rentschler, K. (2004, November). Using Digitized Speech Output for Young Children Who Require AAC. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
- Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s Guide and Technical Manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
- Flipsen, P., Jr. (2006). Measuring the intelligibility of conversational speech in children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 303–312.
- Hustad, K.C. (2006). Estimating the intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 58, 217–228.
- Hustad, K.C. (2008). The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 51, 562–573.
- Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the development of speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 220–230.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 120–128.
- Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. R. (1990). A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 61–68.
- Pinkoski, C. J. (2010). Synthesized speech intelligibility and preschool age children: Comparing accuracy for single word repetition with repeated exposure. Retrieved from University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy: http://purl.umn.edu/102435.
- Secord, W., & Donohue, J. (2002). Clinical Assessment of Articulation and Phonology. Greenville, SC: Super Duper Publications.
- Schiavetti, N. (1992). Scaling procedures for measuring speech intelligibility. In R. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in Speech Disorders (pp. 11–34). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
- Smit, A.B. (1993). Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska articulation norms project: Consonant singletons. Journal of Speech-Language-Hearing Research, 36, 533–547.
- Stent, A., Syrdal, A., & Mishra, T. (2011). On the intelligibility of fast synthesized speech for individuals with early-onset blindness. In: The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ‘11) (pp. 211–218). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
- Venkatagiri, H.S. (1996). The quality of digitized and synthesized speech: What clinicians should know. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 31–42.