Handwriting-in-interaction Between People with ALS/MND and their Conversation Partners

References

• Ball, L. J., Nordness, A. S., Fager, S. K., Kersch, K., Mohr, B., Pattee, G. L., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Eye-gaze access to AAC technology for people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Fager, S., & Nordness, A. (2011). Communication support for people with ALS. Neurology Research International, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in dysarthria: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 38–55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Beeke, S. (2008). Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 974–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Communication aid use in children's conversation: Time, timing and speaker transfer. In H. Gardener & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interaction in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 249–266). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. von Techner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 89–100). London, UK: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Markova, I. (1995). Complementarity in the construction of a problematic utterance in conversation. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann, & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in dialogue (pp. 238–263). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S., Markova, I., & Murphy, J. (1997). Bringing conversations to a close: The management of closings in interactions between AAC users and ‘natural’ speakers. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 467–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., & Phillips, B. (2001). Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P., & Palmer, R. (2007). Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (2nd ed.). Texas: Proed.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language in Society, 54, 787–815.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Footing. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 124–159). Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization - Interaction between hearers and speakers. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, E. K., Yorkston, K. M., & Britton, D. (2011). Dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review of characte ristics, speech treatment, and augmentative and alternative communication options. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 12–30.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Engelke, C.R. (2013). A primer for doing talk-in-interaction research in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication system users. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 265–294). Philadelphia, PA: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Hillel, A., Miller, R., Yorkston, K., McDonald, E., Norris, E., & Konikow, N. (1989). Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis severity scale. Journal of Neuroepidemiology, 8, 142–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, J. E., Wren, P. A., & Gruis, K. L. (2011). What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 12, 318–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Lyon, K., & West, D. (2011). Non-electronic communication aids for people with complex communication needs. International Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 13, 399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. ix–xvi). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., & Williams, A. (2010). A conceptual review of writing research in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 158–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. (2005). Alternative questions used in conversational repair. Discourse Studies, 7, 193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathy, P. (1996). Use and evaluation of electronic communication by adult AAC users. Paper presented at the seventh biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy, P., Yorkston, K., & Gutmann, M. (2000). AAC for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In D. Beukelman & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders (pp. 183–231). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay, A., & Newell, A. (1992). Conversation analysis in AAC. Paper presented at the 2nd ISAAC research symposium in AAC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2004). “I prefer people this close”: Perceptions of AAC by people with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 259–271.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2010). Using full repeats to initiate repair on others’ questions. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43, 232–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A., & McAllister, S. (1995). Use of AAC by individuals with acquired neurologic communication disabilities: Results of an Australian survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 138–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1981: Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & A. Thompson Sandra (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (1994). Empatic speech style – with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 375–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvoni, S., Volpato, C., Cavinato, M., Marchetti, M., Priftis, K., Merico, A,….Piccione, F. (2009). P300-based brain-computer interface communication: Evaluation and follow-up in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3, 60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, under standing and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, 6, 489–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomik, B., & Guiloff, R. J. (2010). Dysarthria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A review. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 11, 4–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & A. Thompson Sandra (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bloch, S., & Clarke, M. T. (2011). On the use of graphic resources by people with communication disorders in the construction of turns-in-interaction. In C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron, & J.Streek (Eds.), Multimodality and human activity: Research on behaviour, action and communication (pp. 152–168). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. (1989). Early intervention in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A case presentation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Strand, E., Miller, R., Hillel, A., & Smith, K. (1993). Speech deterioration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Implications for the timing of intervention. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 35–46.
   Google Scholar