A Primer for Doing Talk-in-interaction Research in Augmentative 
and Alternative Communication

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., Best, W., & Cooper, F. (2011). Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, A. (1986). Communication in the back-channel: Social structural analysis of nonspeech/speech conversations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses (Publication No. AAT 8629674).
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Beeke, S. (2008). Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22, 974–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., Clarke, M., & Collins, S. (2001). Conversation analysis and AAC: From principle to practice. Communication Matters, 15(2), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Clarke, M. (2013). Handwriting in interaction between people with ALS/MND and their conversation partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46, 510–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M., & Wiemann, J. (1988). Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented-communicator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 3–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, M., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 336–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Communication aid use in children's conversation: Time, timing and speaker transfer. In H. Gardiner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood. Insights from conversation analysis,pp. 249–266
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duranti, A. (2003). Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology: Three Paradigms.Current Anthropology,44, 323–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelke, C. R., & Mangano, D. (2006). Using the world: A language socialization study of children with autism's apprenticeship into semiotic practices of shared meaning and representation. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, C. R., & Mangano, D. (2008). Temporal cues: What children with severe autism can teach us about the organization of intersubjectivity. Paper presented at the SALSA, University of Texas-Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press New York.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66, 133–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1966). Gender display. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 3, 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. A. (1975). A system for the transfer of instructions in natural settings. Semiotica, 14, 269–296.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language.(pp. 97–121). New York, NY: Halsted Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 272–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1993). Recording human interaction in natural setting. Pragmatics, 3, 181–209.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2001). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis. (pp. 157–182). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accom­plishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage. (pp. 90–116). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can't speak: The 
social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14, 
151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2006). Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction (English ed.). (pp. 97–125). Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence. (pp. 56–80). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., (1998). Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. In. S. Hoyle & C. Temple (Eds), Kids’ talk: Strategic language use in later childhood. (pp. 23–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). A descriptive analysis of communicative interaction processes involving non-vocal severely handicapped children. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin – Madison).
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1989). The interplay of communication device output mode and interactional style between nonspeaking persons and their speaking partners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 320–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. & Yoder, D. (1982). Communication within natural conversational interaction. Topic in Language Disorders, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Caves, K. (2002). AAC performance and usability issues: The effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology, 14, 45–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Wilkins, D. P. (2006). The short story of frametalker: An interactive AAC device. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Engelke, C. R. (2011). InTra: An interactive design for AAC:A show and tell. Presented at the Clinical AAC Conference, Minneapolis, MN, October.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Engelke, C. R. (2012). InTra: Technologies for using partner speak in AAC. Presented at the Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL, January.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Lesher, G. W., Moulton, B. J., & Rinkus, G. J. (2002). Automated data logging in augmentative communication. In J. Winters, C. Robinson, R. Simpson, & G. Vanderheiden (Eds.), Emerging and accessible telecommunications, information and healthcare technologies – Engineering challenges in enabling universal access. (pp. 82–94). Arlington, VA:RESNA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1988). Studying the conversations of nonspeaking persons. In L. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Research and clinical issues. (pp. 265–294). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Wilkins, D. P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Time and timing issues in augmentative communication. In J. Duchan, D. Kovarsky, & M. Maxwell (Eds.), The social construction of language (in)competence. (pp. 49–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(3), 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1983). Issues in the transcription of naturally-occurring talk: Caricature versus capturing pronunciational particulars. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature (Tilburg University), 34, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. (pp. 13–31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Korkiakangas, T., & Rae, J. (2013). Gearing up to a new activity: How teachers use object adjustments to manage the attention of children with autism. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 83–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovarsky, D., Duchan, J. F., & Maxwell, M. (1999). Constructing (in)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Makim, J., Edmundson, A., Bruce, C., & Moir, D. K. (2001). Supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation (SPPARC). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 25–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Samuelsson, C., & Plejert, C. (Eds.). (in press). Aided communication in everyday interaction. London: J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Svensson, E., & Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 20–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, BB, (Eds)Developmental pragmatics. (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Graesch, A. P., Mittman, A., Bradbury, T., & Repetti, R. (2005). Video ethnography and ethnoarchaeological tracking. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods and approaches. (pp. 387–409). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar (Vol. 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilesjö, M. S, & Rasmussen, G. (2011). Exploring interaction between a nonspeaking boy using aided augmentative and alternative communication and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organization and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research and Communication Disorders, 2(2), 183–213.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1989). Lecture fourteen: The inference-making machine. Human Studies, 12, 379–393.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2009). Conversation analysis and communication disorders. The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. Americon Anthropologist, 70, 1075–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation. American Journal of Sociology,97, 1295–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., Higginbotham, D. J., Lesher, G., Moulton, B., & Mathy, P. (2006). The development of an automated method for analyzing communication rate in augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology, 18, 107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. D. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., Plejert, C., & Rönnberg, J. (2010). The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication and Medicine, 7, 165–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sweidel, G. B. (1991). Management strategies in the communication of speaking persons and persons with a speech disability. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 25, 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (1st edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Introduction. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. (pp. 1–18). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wieder, D. L. (1999). Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, microanalysis, and the ethnography of speaking (EM-CA-MA-ES):Resonances and basic issues. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2013). Gestural depiction: On the form and use of iconic gestures in aphasic talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 68–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bloch, S., & Clarke, M. (2011). On the use of 
graphic resources in interaction by people with communication disorders. In J. Streeck, C., Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar