Putting People First: Re-Thinking the Role of Technology in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention

References

• Ball, L., Nordness, A., Fager, S., Kersch, K., Pattee, G., & Beukelman, D. (2010). Eye-gaze access of AAC technology for persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal Medical Speech Language Pathology, 18, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Berens, J., Del Campo, S., & Rivera, D. (2008). Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 323–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., Williams, M. P., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. (2013). The use of augmentative and alternative communication apps for the iPad, iPod and iPhone: An overview of recent developments. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 18(1), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Potts, B. B., & Carey, A. C. (2006). Job-related social networks and communication technology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, K., Shane, H. C., & DeRuyter, F. (2002). Connecting AAC devices to the world of information technology. Assistive Technology, 14, 81–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung, Y., Behrmann, M., Bannan, B., & Thorp, E. (2012). Perspectives of high tech augmentative and alternative communication users with cerebral palsy at the post-secondary level. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(2), 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. C., Carter, E. W., & Sisco, L. G. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 349–367. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cockerill, H., Elbourne, D., Allen, E., Scrutton, D., Will, E., McNee, A., … Baird, G. (2013). Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: The SH & PE population study. Child: care, health and development. Early online.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, B., & Self, H. (2010). Preparing youth who use AAC to communicate with their personal assistants. In D. McNaughton and D. Beukelman (Eds.) Transition strategies for adolescents and young adults who use AAC (pp. 163–180). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology, 22, 200–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., Light, J. C., & Newell, K. M. (2012). Factors affecting computer mouse use for young children: Implications for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo, J., Estrella, G., Estrella, L. J., Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Seabury, M. (2008). “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 16–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leo, G., Lubas, M., & Mitchell, J. (2012). Lack of communication even when using alternative and augmentative communication devices: Are we forgetting about the three components of language?Autism, 2, e109.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., Patel, R., Heaton, J. T., Colby, G., Gilmore, L. D., Cabrera, J., … Meltzner, G. S. (2009). Disordered speech recognition using acoustic and sEMG signals. INTERSPEECH (pp. 644–647).
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. & Light, J. (2013). The effects of AAC technologies with just in time programming on the communication of adolescents with severe disabilities. Research project in progress.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D., Light, J. C., Curran-Speltz, J. H., Fallon, K. A., & Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2½-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dropik, P. L., & Reichle, J. (2008). Comparison of accuracy and efficiency of directed scanning and group-item scanning for augmentative communication selection techniques with typically developing preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Bardach, L., Russell, S., & Higginbotham, J. (2012). Access to augmentative and alternative communication: New technologies and clinical decision-making. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 5, 53–61. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2012-0196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fager, S., Beukelman, D. R., Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T., & Baker, J. (2012). Access interface strategies. Assistive Technology, 24, 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R., & Hux, K. (2012). Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assistive Technology, 24, 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., Rowland, C., Daniels, D., Mooney, A., & Noethe, G. (2013). Mobile Technology as Communication Supports for Adults with Primary Progressive Aphasia. Presentation at 2013 RESNA/ATIA Research Symposium, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Friginal, E., Pearson, P., Di Ferrante, L., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C. (2013). Linguistic characteristics of AAC discourse in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 15, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens’, C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (1999). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive, symbolic communication. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications (4th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, D. (2011). Mobile technology and AAC Apps from an AAC developer's perspective. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 28–33. doi: 10.1044/aac20.1.28
   Google Scholar
• Hourcade, J., Pilotte, T. E., West, E., & Parette, P. (2004). A history of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Buechter, M., Wallace, S., & Weissling, K. (2010). Using visual scene displays to create a shared communication space for a person with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 643–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, G. W. (2011). The iPad: A cool communicator on the go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 24–27. doi: 10.1044/aac20.1.24
   Google Scholar
• Isakson, C. L., Burgstahler, S., & Arnold, A. (2006). AAC, employment, and independent living. Assistive Technology, 3, 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2010). Navigating through transition with individuals with speech disabilities. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2), 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. E., & Light, J. C. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lesher, G., Moulton, B., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1998). Techniques for augmenting scanning communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82. doi: 10.1080/07434618812331274657
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference?: The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Effects of early AAC intervention on the communication skills of children with Down syndrome. Seminar presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012a). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012b). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2011.648717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorah, E. R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1–13. Early on-line.
   Google Scholar
• Luciani, B. A. (2010). Woman with speech disability achieves dream: Goes to college. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(2), 41–43.
   Google Scholar
• McCord, M. S., & Soto, G. (2004). Perceptions of AAC: An ethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 209–227.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M. L., Dietz, A. R., Hux, K., Weissling, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (2007). Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a visual scene display prototype. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. B., Bryen, D. N., Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Kennedy, P. (2012). Young adults with complex communication needs: Research and development in AAC for a “diverse” population. Assistive Technology, 24, 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1990). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Meder, A. (2012, March 28). Mobile media devices and communication applications as a form of augmentative and alternative communication: An assessment of family wants, needs, and preferences (Masters thesis). University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. A. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• National Core Indicators. (2012). National Core Indicators Chart Generator. Retrieved from http://www.nationalcoreindicators.org/
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer, D., Donnellan, A., & Robledo, J. (2012). Taking the pulse of augmentative and alternative communication on iOS. Assistiveware. Retrieved from http://www.assistiveware.com/taking-pulse-augmentative-and-alternative-communication-ios
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J. (1983). The QWERTY keyboard: A review. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Oken, B. S., Orhan, U., Roark, B., Erdogmus, D., Fowler, A., Mooney, A., … Fried-Oken, M. (in press).Brain-computer interface with language model-EEG fusion for locked-in syndrome.Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.
   Google Scholar
• Orhan, U., Hild, K. E., Erdogmus, D., Roark, B., Oken, B., & Fried-Oken, M. (2012, March). RSVP keyboard: An EEG based typing interface. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 12) (pp. 645–648). doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6287966
   Google Scholar
• Piche, L., & Reichle, J. (1991). Teaching scanning selection techniques. In J. Reichle, J. York, & J. Sigafoos (Eds.) Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities (pp. 257–274). Baltimore, MD: Brookes
   Google Scholar
• Pramis, J. (2013, March 12). Study shows that 90 percent of apps are downloaded once then deleted. Digital Trends. Retrieved August 30, 2013, from http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/16-percent-of-mobile-userstry-out-a-buggy-app-more-than-twice/
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D’Silva, K. (2005). “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RERC on Communication Enhancement. (2011, March 14). Mobile devices and communication apps: An AAC-RERC White Paper. Retrieved from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
   Google Scholar
• Rummel-Hudson, R. (2011). A revolution at their fingertips. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 19–23. doi: 10.1044/aac20.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J. (2005). Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disability & Rehabilitation, 27, 731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, E. W., Vaughan, T. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2010). A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 11, 449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Blackstone, S., Vanderheiden, G., Williams, M., & DeRuyter, F. (2012). Using AAC technology to access the world. Assistive Technology, 24, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Laubscher, E. H., Schlosser, R. W., Flynn, S., Sorce, J. F., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., & Connolly, I. (2008). Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 3, 260–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stancliffe, R. J., Larson, S., Auerbach, K., Engler, J., Taub, S., & Lakin, K. C. (2010). Individuals with intellectual disabilities and augmentative and alternative communication: Analysis of survey data on uptake of aided AAC and loneliness experiences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. (2009). The effects of color cues on typically developing preschoolers’ speed of locating a target line drawing: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication display design. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todis, B., & Woodward, J. (2001). It can't hurt: Implementing AAC technology in the classroom for students with severe and multiple disabilities. In J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.) Technology, curriculum and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 27–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J., Lee, H. C., & Tseng, S. F. (2011). The effect of communication partners’ training on the functional use of augmented devices in a residential home. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 14, 205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (2003). A journey through early augmentative communication and computer access. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39(6; SUPP), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• White, A. R., Carney, E., & Reichle, J. (2010). Group-item and directed scanning: Examining preschoolers’ accuracy and efficiency in two augmentative communication symbol selection methods. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 311–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., & Coombs, B. (2010). Preliminary exploration of the effect of background color on the speed and accuracy of search for an aided symbol target by typically developing preschoolers. Early Childhood Services, 4, 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., & Light, J. (2013). Effects of AAC displays on the visual preference of typically developing infants. Research project in progress.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Snell, J. (2011). Facilitating children's ability to distinguish symbols for emotions: The effects of background color cues and spatial arrangement of symbols on accuracy and speed of search. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 288–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. B. (2004). Confessions of a multi-modal man. Alternatively Speaking, 7(1), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Beukelman, D., & Ullman, C. (2012). AAC text messaging. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar