The Iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols for Children with English Additional Language and Mild Intellectual Disability

References

• Barton, A., Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basson, M., & Alant, E. (2005). The iconicity and ease of learning of picture communication symbols: A study with Afrikaans-speaking children. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 4–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blischak, D. M., Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1997). Terminology issues. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 43–47). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bornman, J., Alant, E., & Du Preez, A. (2009). Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking children: An exploration. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Bryen, D. N., Kershaw, P., & Ledwaba, G. (2011). Reducing the risk of being a victim of crime in South Africa: You can tell and be heard! Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 117–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, R. (2000a). The Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, R. (2000b). The Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (1993). Children's drawings of the human figure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• De Klerk, V. (2002). Language issues in our schools: Whose voice counts? Part 1: The parents speak. Perspectives in Education, 20, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, L. S. (1981). A functional analysis of photo-matching skills in severely retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 14, 465–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, M., & Schellens, P. J. (1995). Met het oog of de lezer. Pretesmethoden voor schrifteljik voorlichtingsmateriaal. Amsterdam: Thesis publishers.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. (1991). Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, J. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols: The model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deregowski, J. B. (1980). Perception. In H. C. Triandes, & W. Lonner (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Volume 3, Basic Processes (pp. 21–115). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Emms, L., & Gardner, H. (2010). Study of two graphic symbol-teaching methods for individuals with physical disabilities and additional learning difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 4–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Planning an initial expressive sign lexicon for persons with severe communication impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisawa, K., Inoue, T., Yamana, Y., & Hayashi, H. (2011). The effect of animation on learning action symbols by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Symbol selection. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 43–47). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., & Stratton, M. M. (1997). Aided AAC symbols. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 43–47). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt, L., & Alant, E. (2002). The iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols for rural Zulu children. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 49, 40–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hetzroni, O. E., & Harris, O. L. (1996). Cultural aspects in the development of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. H., & Chen, M. C. (2011). Effect of translucency on transparency and symbol learning for children with and without cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1829–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Huguet, A. (2012). The iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols for children with English additional language and intellectual disabilities. University of Pretoria: Electronic Theses and Dissertations. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-07152012-185754/
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, H. I., & Sadock, B. J. (1998). Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioural science/clinical psychiatry (8th ed.). Baltimore, MA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). KBIT-2 – Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition – Manual. Bloomington, IN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Koekemoer, H. (2000). The comparison of the learnability and recognition between Blissymbolics and Cyberglyphs. University of Pretoria: Electronic Theses and Dissertations. etd-05112007-074054
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K. D R. , & Nemser, J. G. (2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Pitkin, L. (2007). Children's ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luftig, R. L., & Bersani, H. A., Jr. (1985). An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation issues (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Fuller, D. R., Loncke, F., & Bos, H. (1997). Introduction to AAC symbols. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson, (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 43–47). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Martlew, M., & Connolly, K. J. (1996). Human figure drawings by schooled and unschooled children in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 67, 2743–2762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). Graphic representational systems and literacy learning. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Lindsay, P. (1995). Approaching literacy with AAC graphics. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 212–228.
   Google Scholar
• Meirim, G., Jordaan, H., Kallenbach, A., & Rijhumal, M. (2010). Development of semantic processes for academic language in foundation phase EAL learners. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 57, 43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mineo Mollica, B. (2003). Representational competence. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 107–146). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Locke, P. A. (1989). A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 131–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko, M. (1987). Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Reichle, J. (1989). Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectually handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 627–633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moolman, E., & Alant, E. (1997). The teaching of Blissymbols as a bridge into literacy for children with cognitive impairments: A comparison of two training approaches. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 73–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nadal, S. F. (1939). The application of intelligence tests in the anthropological field. In F. C. Bartlett, E. Grinsberg, E. J. Lindgren, & R. M. Thouless (Eds.), The study of society (pp. 184–198). London: Kegan, Paul Tyrench, Trubner and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Newell, A. F., Alm, N., & Waller, A. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system? A cross-culture study of picture-based sentences constructed by Japanese and English speakers.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, P. L., & McWilliam, P. J. (1993). Emerging literacy in children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. D. (2003). Cognitive skills and AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp. 241–276). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1997). Nomenclature of category levels in graphic symbols, Part I: Is a flower a flower a flower? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a story-telling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalisation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 979–995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Koul, R., & Bloomfield, E. (2011). Identifying performing and under-performing graphic symbols for verbs and prepositions in animated and static formats. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative view. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (1986). Representational matching skills of persons with severe retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 160–164.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2007). The effect of colour on the recognition and use of line drawings by children with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2009). Iconicity in the development of picture skills: Typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 187–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., & Linfoot, K. (1996). Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 244–255.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, O. L., & Clarke, M. G. (1994). Culture and communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 15, 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. A. (1967). A cognitive styles approach to cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 2, 233–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W., & Young, T. (1988). The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the guessability of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 35–39.
   Google Scholar