Speech-Language Pathologists’ Perceptions of Implementing Communication Intervention with Students with Multiple and Severe Disabilities

References

• Arthur, M. (2003). Socio-communicative variables and behaviour states in students with profound and multiple disabilities: Descriptive data from school settings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 200–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie, E., & Bloomberg, K. (2011, December 6). Everyday use of sign and gesture [Fact sheet]. Retrieved from Key Word Sign Australia, The University of Newcastle, Australia, website: http://www.newcastle.edu.au
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., & Black, T. (2009). Validation of an inventory of best practices in the provision of augmentative and alternative communication services to students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 329–342. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0065)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., Newton, C., Griffiths, T., Price, K., Lysley, A., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). Factors associated with the participation of children with complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 774–780. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., & Odom, S.L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Mathisen, B., Foreman, P., & Balandin, S. (2010). Where are teachers’ voices? A research agenda to enhance the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities at school. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32, 1059–1072. doi:10.3109/09638280903410730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Arthur-Kelly, M., Foreman, P., Balandin, S., & Mathisen, B. (2011). Complex contextual influences on the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 422–435. doi:10.3109/17549507.2011.550691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, T., Balandin, S., Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Mathisen, B. (2012). Mainstream teachers’ experiences of communicating with students with multiple and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, J. (2001). Meeting the communication needs of students with severe and multiple disabilities in general classrooms. Exceptionality, 9, 147–156. doi:10.1207/S15327035 EX0903_5
   Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & Du Pre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Blasé, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 531–540. doi:10.1177/1049731509335549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., Bennett, D., Neilands, J., & Colyvas, K. (2013). Observed changes in the alertness and communicative involvement of students with multiple and severe disability following in-class mentor-modelling for staff in segregated and general education classrooms. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, doi: 10.1111/jir.12066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, M., de Marrais, K., Preissle, J., Roulston, K., & St. Pierre, E. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36, 25–32. doi:10.3102/0013189X06298009
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haggis, T. (2008). ‘Knowledge must be contextual’: Some possible implications of complexity and dynamic systems theory for educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 158–176.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, J., Bronicki, B., & Guess, D. (1987). Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, T. L., Howard, M., Prelock, P. A., & Belin, G. (2010). Retention of school-based SLPs: Relationships among caseload size, workload satisfaction, job satisfaction, and best practice. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31, 139–154. doi:10.1177/1525740109336870
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cameron, M. (2009). Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 236–249. doi:10.3109/07434610903322151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2013, September 11). Special interest research group: Profound multiple disabilities [home page]. Retrieved from: http://www.iassid.org/index.php
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (2013, October 18). What is AAC? [home page]. Retrieved from: http://www.isaac.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J. E., & Light, J. C. (2003). General education teachers’ experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–124. doi:10.1080/ 0743461031000112043
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change?Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 35–49. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00413.x
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, Inc. (1995–2003). Boardmaker [Computer software]. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Munde, V. S., Vlaskamp, C., Ruijssenaars, A. J., & Nakken, H. (2009). Alertness in individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 462–480. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2009). NVivo (Version 8) [Computer software]. Retrieved from: http://www.qsrinternational.com
   Google Scholar
• Packman, A., & Kuhn, L. (2009). Looking at stuttering through the lens of complexity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 77–82. doi:10.1080/17549500802630039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., Fried-Oken, M., Steiner, S. A. M., Lollar, D., Phelps, R., Simeonsson, R. J., & Granlund, M. (2012). Developing the ICF-CY for AAC profile and code set for children who rely on AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. B., & Justice, L. (2011). Schools as complex host environments: Understanding aspects of schools that may influence clinical practice and research. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, E. B., Maddox, L. L., Ogletree, B. T., & Westling, D. L. (2010). Communication-based services for persons with severe disabilities in schools: A survey of speech-language pathologists. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 148–159. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson, R. J., Bjorck-Akesson, E., & Lollar, D. J. (2012). Communication, disability and the ICF-CY. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., Carter, M., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2011). Professional learning for teachers without special education qualifications working with students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 7–20. doi:10.1177/0888406410384407
   Google Scholar
• Threats, T. T. (2010). The complexity of social/cultural dimension in communication disorders. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 62, 158–169. doi:10.1159/000314031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (1993). Makaton symbols. Camberley, England: Makaton Development Project.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO) (2007). International classification of functioning, disability and health: Child and youth version. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization Press.
   Google Scholar