References
- Bedrosian, J. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6–10.
- Boyer, C., Trudeau, N., & Sutton, A. (2012). Performance of children with typical development when reading and interpreting graphic-symbol sequences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 96–105.
- Clifton, C. J., Meyer, A. S., Wurm, L. H., & Treiman, R. (2013).Language comprehension and production. In A. F. Healy, & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 4, Experimental psychology (2nd edn, pp. 523–547). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Conrad, R. (1971). The chronology of the development of covert speech in children. Developmental Psychology, 5, 398–405.
- Dukhovny, E., & Soto, G. (2013). Speech generating devices and modality of short-term word storage. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 246–258.
- Dunn, L., Thériault-Whalen, C., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peaboby [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. Toronto, Canada: Psycan.
- Fuller, D. (1997). Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 30–39.
- Harris, M., & Reichle, J. (2004)The impact of aided language stimulation on symbol comprehension and production in children with moderate cognitive disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 155–167.
- Hehner, B. (1980). Blissymbols for use. Toronto: Blissymbol Communication International.
- Higginbotham, J. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 2–5.
- Higginbotham, J., & Bedrosian, J. (1995):Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13.
- Johnson, R. (1994). The Picture Communication Symbols. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer Johnson.
- Kemps, E., De Rammelaere, S., & Desmet, T. (2000). The development of working memory: Exploring the complementarity of two models. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 89–109.
- Light, J. C. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
- Light, J. C. (2003). Shattering the silence: Development of communicative competence by individuals who use AAC. In J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes.
- Mineo Mollica, B. (2003). Representational competence. In J. Light, D. Beukelman & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for people who use AAC: From research to effective practice (pp.107–145), Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
- Nakamura, K., Newell, A., Alm, N., & Waller, A. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system? A cross-cultural study of picture-based sentences constructed by English and Japanese speakers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 71–80.
- Sevcik, R. (2006). Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 159–167.
- Smith, M. M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136), London, UK: Whurr.
- Sutton, A., Gallagher, T., Morford, J. P., & Shahnaz, N. (2000). Relative clause sentence production using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 473–486.
- Sutton, A., & Morford, J. P. (1998). Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
- Sutton, A., Morford, J. P., & Gallagher, T. (2004). Production and comprehension of graphic symbol utterances expressing complex propositions by adults who use AAC systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 349–371.
- Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204.
- Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M.-A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26.
- Thistle, J., & Wilkinson, K. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 235–245.
- Trudeau, N., Morford, J. P., & Sutton, A. (2010). The role of word order in the interpretation of canonical and non-canonical graphic symbol utterances: A developmental study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 108–121.
- Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The impact of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech-Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329.
- Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Morford, J., Coté-Giroux, P., Pauzé, A.-M., & Vallée,V. (2010). Strategies in construction and Interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 299–312.