Effects of Environmental Sounds on the Guessability of Animated Graphic Symbols

References

• Ahlner, F., & Zlatev, J. (2010). Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies, 38, 298–348
   Google Scholar
• Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermeier, K., Schooley, K., Harasymowyz, U., & Schlosser, R. W. (2010). The role of fingerspelled self-cues during spelling with a speech generating device by a child with autism: A brief report. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22, 197–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33, 717–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2008). Verb specificity and argument realization in Tzeltal child language. In M. Bowerman, & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 167–189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1977). Why are signed languages easier to learn that spoken languages? Part two. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 32, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, R. (2000). Receptive One-word Picture Vocabulary Test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. C. (2000). Factors affecting graphic symbol understanding in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development, 15, 207–236.
   Google Scholar
• Crutcher, R. J., & Beer, J. M. (2011). Auditory analog of the picture superiority effect. Memory and Cognition, 39, 63–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuskley, C., Kirby, S., & Simner, J. (2010). Cross-modality: Reviving iconicity in the evolution of language. In The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference. London, UK: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. S. (1991). The validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary and syntax at 24 months. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 565–571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dukhovny, E., & Soto, G. (2013). Speech generating devices and modality of short-term word storage. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 246–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., . . . & Reilly, J. S. (1994). Macarthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fujisawa, K., Inoue, T., Yamana, Y., & Hayashi, H. (2011). The effect of animation of learning action symbols by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Lloyd, R. (1991). Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 215–220.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., Lloyd, L. L., & Schlosser, R. (1992). Further development of an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gangkofer, M. (1990). Bilder lesen muss man lernen: Grundschüler deuten BLISS-Symbole. In H. Brügelmann & H. Balhorn (Eds.), Das Gehirn, sein Alfabet und andere Geschichten (pp. 169–177). Konstaz: Faude.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1986). Auditory icons: Using environmental sounds in computer interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2004). Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. Acoustical Society of America, 155, 1252–1265.
   Google Scholar
• Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2007). Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 839–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi, B., & Shafiro, V. (2008). The incongruency advantage for sounds in natural scenes. Audio Engineering Society Convention 125. Audio Engineering Society.
   Google Scholar
• Huguet, A., Dada, S., & Bornman, J. (2013). The iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols for children with English additional language and mild intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 360–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jagaroo, V., & Wilkinson, K. (2008). Further considerations of visual cognitive neuroscience in aided AAC: The potential role of motion perception systems in maximizing design display. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 29–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., .. & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P., & Stevens, C. (2004). Meaning from environmental sounds: Types of signal-referent relations and their effect on recognizing auditory icons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. J., & Palmer, A. R. (1985). Integration of visual and auditory information in bimodal neurones in the guinea-pig superior colliculus. Experimental Brain Research, 60, 492–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein, A. M., Hauf, P., & Aschersleben, G. (2006). The role of action effects in 12-month-olds’ action control: A comparison of televised model and live model. Infant Behavior & Development, 29, 535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R., Petroi, D., & Schlosser, R. W. (2010). Systematic review of speech generating devices for aphasia. In J. W. Mullenix & S. E. Stern (Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. & Drager, K. (2012). Effects of early AAC intervention on the communication skills of children with Down syndrome.Seminar presented at the biennial conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication,Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Drager, K., & Nemser, J. (2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Page, R., Curran, J., & Pitkin, L. (2007). Children's ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 274–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L., Fuller, D., & Arvidson, H. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Maouene, J., Sethuraman, N., Laakso, A., & Maouene, M. (2011). The body region correlates of concrete and abstract verbs in early child language. Cognition, Brain, and Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 449–484.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, T. (2008). Boardmaker Plus. Solana Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mätzig, S., Druks, J., Masterson, J., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45, 738–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcell, M. M., Borella, D., Greene, M., Kerr, E., & Rogers, S. (2000). Confrontation naming of environmental sounds. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 830–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, J., Druks, J., & Gallienne, D. (2008). Object and action naming in three- and five-year old children. Journal of Child Language, 35, 373–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. A., Nemitz, J. W., Stein, B. E. (1987). Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3215–3229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1983). Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science, 22, 389–391.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo, B. A., Peischl, D., & Pennington, C. (2008). Moving targets: The effect of animation on identification of action word representations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pa, J., Wilson, S. M., Pickell, H., Bellugi, U., & Hickok, G. (2008). Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory in sensory modality-dependent: Evidence from signed and spoken language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2198–2210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual-coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaranta, N., Giagnotti, R., Bartoli, A., & D’Elia, A. (2011). Environmental sounds identification in children with cochlear implant. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology; Abstracts ESPCI 75, 56.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Mirenda, P., Locke, P., Piche, L., & Johnston, S. (1993). Beginning augmentative communication systems. In S. F Warren & J. Reichle, (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 131–156). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Wacker, D. (1993), Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. H., & Griffith, P. L. (1979). On the scientific status of iconicity. Sign Language Studies, 25, 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1997a). Nomenclature and category levels in graphic symbols, Part I: Is a flower a flower a flower? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1997b). Nomenclature and category levels in graphic symbols, Part II: The role of similarity in categorization. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 36–44.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Belfiore, P. J., Nigam, R., Blischak, D., & Hetzroni, O. (1995). The effects of speech output technology in the learning of graphic symbols. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 537–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Gygi, B., Kong, Y. Y., Sorce, J., Harmon, A., & Shane, H. C. (2013). Sound-linked graphic symbols in augmentative and alternative communication: Theoretical underpinnings and mapping of potential research themes. Northeastern University. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Koul, R., Shane, H., Sorce, J., Brock, K., Harmon, A. . . . & Hearn, E. (in press). Effects of animation on naming and identification across two graphic symbol sets representing verbs and prepositions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Laubscher, E., Sorce, J., Koul, R., Flynn, S., Hotz, L., . . . & Shane, H. (2013). Implementing directives that involve prepositions with children with autism: A comparison of spoken cues with two types of augmented input. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 132–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Source, J., Koul, R., & Bloomfield, E. (2011). Identifying performing and under performing graphic symbols for verbs and prepositions in animated and static formats: A research note. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Source, J., Koul, R., Bloomfield, E., Debrowski, L., . . . Neff, A. (2012). Animation of graphic symbols representing verbs and prepositions: Effects on transparency, name agreement, and identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 342–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Sigafoos, J., & Koul, R. K. (2009). Speech output and speech generating devices in autism spectrum disorders. In P. Mirenda & T. Iacono (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders and AAC (pp. 141–170). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., Laubscher, E., Schlosser, R. W., Flynn, S., Sorce, J. F., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1228–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Wermink, H., Didden, R., Green, V. A., Schlosser, R. W., O’Reilly, M.F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Effects of varying lengths of synthetic speech output on augmented requesting and natural speech production in an adolescent with Klinefelter syndrome. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Olmstead, W. (1993). Semiotic perspective for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 134–141.
   Google Scholar
• Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Paivio, A. (1994). Memory for pictures and sounds: Independence of auditory and visual codes. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 380–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, D., Cornelius, C., Krieman, J., Tonick, I., Tanguay, P., & Schulman, M. L. (1988). Recognition of environmental sounds in autistic children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 423–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yovetich, W., & Young, T. (1988). The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the “guessability” of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 35–39.
   Google Scholar