iPads, Mobile Technologies, and Communication Applications: A Survey of Family Wants, Needs, and Preferences

References

• AAC-RERC (2011). Mobile devices and communication apps: An AAC-RERC white paper. Retrieved from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech Language-Hearing Association (2006). 2006 Schools Survey report: Caseload characteristics. Rockville, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Jones, S., & Kokoska, S. (1995). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D., Kokoska, S., & Jones, S. (1996). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Jr., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, J. M., Shane, H. C., & Caron, J. (2013). AAC, mobile devices, and apps: Growing pains with evidence based practice. Retrieved from: http://www.childrenshospital.org/clinicalservices/Site2016/mainpageS2016P20.html, 1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication and language: Understanding and responding to parents’ perspectives. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham, G. (2011, April). The future at hand: Mobile devices and apps in clinical practice. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110405/The-Future-at-Hand—Mobile-Devices-and-Apps-in-Clinical-Practice.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, K. A. (2008). AAC in the schools: Current issues and future directions. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B. (2011). iTherapy: The revolution of mobile devices within the field of speech therapy. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 12, 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, J., Costello, J., & Shane, H. (2011). Using a clinical approach to answer “What communication apps should we use?” Perspectives on Augmentatives and Alternative Communication, 20, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, J. (2011, October 11). Apps: An emerging tool for SLPs: A plethora of apps can be used to develop expressive, receptive, and other language skills. The ASHA Leader. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/111011/Apps—An-Emerging-Tool-for-SLPs.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, D. (2011). Mobile technology and AAC apps from an AAC developer's perspective. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hourcade, J., Pilotte, T. E., West, E., & Parette, P. (2004). A history of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19, 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Angelo, D., & Kokoska, S. (1998). Stressors and family supports: Families with children using augmentative and alternative communication technology. Journal of Children's Communication Development, 20, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T.N., … & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton D. (2013). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in AAC intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, D. (2011). AAC evaluations and new mobile technologies: Asking and answering the right questions. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeijer, D., Donnellan, A., & Robledo, J. (2012). Taking the pulse of augmentative and alternative communication on iOS. Assistiveware. Retrieved from http://www.assistiveware.com/taking-pulse-augmentative-and-alternative-communication-ios
   Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., Jr., Brotherson, M. J., & Huer, M. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Rummel-Hudson, R. (2011). A revolution at their fingertips. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Starble, A., Hutchins, T., Favro, M. A., Prelock, P., & Bitner, B. (2005). Family-centered intervention and satisfaction with AAC device training. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27, 47–54.
   Google Scholar