“Social Media has Opened a World of ‘Open communication:’” experiences of Adults with Cerebral Palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Social Media

References

• Baker, P., Bricout, J. C., Moon, N. W., Coughlan, B., & Pater, J. (2013). Communities of participation: A comparison of disability and aging identified groups on Facebook and LinkedIn. Telematics and Informatics, 30, 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnfather, A., Stewart, M., Magill-Evans, J., Ray, L., & Letourneau, N. (2011). Computer-mediated support for adolescents with cerebral palsy or spina bifida. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 29, 24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, T. D. (2012). Effectiveness of social media as a tool of communication and its potential for technology enabled connections: A micro level study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, 2(5), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology, 22, 200–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006–065. National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter, F., McNaughton, D., Caves, K., Bryen, D. N., & Williams, M. B. (2007). Enhancing AAC connections with the world. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 258–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. (1996). Making sense of statistics in psychology: A second-level course. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, A., & Ferri, B. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., & Boyles, J. (2012)Disability in the Digital Age. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/08/06/disability-in-the-digital-age
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, T. K., & Gamble, M. W. (2013). Interpersonal Communication: Building connections together. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, B., Palmer, S., & Balandin, S. (2013). Tweet reach: A research protocol for using Twitter to increase information exchange in people with communication disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 243–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynan, A., Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2014). ‘Happy and excited’: Perceptions of using digital technology and social media by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, R. (2004). From research topic to research question: A challenging process. Nurse researcher, 11, 54–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy & online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. (2010). Cerebral palsy and online social networks. Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communi cation systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). Supporting the communication, language, and literacy development of children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research priorities. Assistive Technology, 24, 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2013). Putting people first: Re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. B., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). “Don't give up:” Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative comm unication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Newman, L., Grace, E., & Wood, D. (2013). “I could never do that before:” Effectiveness of a tailored internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 552–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Wood, D., Newman, L., & Lawry, J. (2012). “Why aren't you on Facebook?” Patterns and experiences of using the internet among young people with physical disabilities. Technology and Disability, 24, 149–162.
   Google Scholar
• RERC on Communication Enhancement (2011, March 14). Mobile devices and communication apps: An AAC-RERC White Paper. Retrieved from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H., Blackstone, S., Vanderheiden, G., Williams, M., & DeRuyter, F. (2012). Using AAC technology to access the world. Assistive Technology, 24, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpigelman, C. N., & Gill, C. J. (2014). How to make online social networks accessible for users with intellectual disability? In: K. Miesenberger, D. Fels, D. Archambault, P. Peňáz, & W. Zagler (Eds.), Computers helping people with special needs. Springer International Publishing, Place: Cham, CH. (pp. 471–477).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5, 395–416.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37, 360–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar