Early Intervention and AAC: What a Difference 30 Years Makes

References

• Adamson, L. B., & Dunbar, B. (1991). Communication development of young children with tracheostomies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 275–283.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, L. B., Romski, M., Bakeman, R., & Sevcik, R. A. (2010). Augmented language intervention and the emergence of symbol-infused joint engagement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1769–1773. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0208)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R., & Layfeld, C. (2014). Parents’ perspectives on tele-AAC support for families with a new speech generating device: Results from an Australian pilot study. Perspectives on Telepractice, 4, 52. doi: 10.1044/teles4.2.52
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. H. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, D. H., Jones, S. D., & Kokoska, S. M. (1995). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., Angell, M. E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16615749
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., Marvin, C. A., Beukelman, D. R., Lasker, J., & Rupp, D. (1999). Generic talk use by preschool children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. M., Akaba, S., Brady, N. C., & Thiemann-Bourque, K. (2013). Support for AAC use in preschool, and growth in language skills, for young children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 334–346. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2013.848933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A., Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (2006). Exploring visual-graphic symbol acquisition by pre-school age children with developmental and language delays. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 10–20. doi: 10.1080/07434610500238206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1997). Language acquisition in young AAC system users: Issues and directions for future research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1999). Efficacy research issues in AAC: Interactive storybook reading. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. (1987). Strategies for involving parents in programs for young children using augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 90–93. Retrieved from http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07434618712331274319
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Ansel, B. M. (1995). Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 131–134.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th edn). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Ball, L., Dietz, A., Kent-Walsh, J., Lasker, J., Lund, S., … & Quach, W. (2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 278–288. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2012.716079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Berens, J., Kent-Walsh, J., & Taylor, S. (2008). The effects of aided AAC interventions on AAC use, speech, and symbolic gestures. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 101–111. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1079124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., Ewing, C., & Taylor, S. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0015)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/022)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi: 10.1080/07434610600807470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blischak, D., Lombardino, L., & Dyson, A. (2003). Use of speech-generating devices: In support of natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 29–35. doi: 10.1080/0743461032000056478
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 9, 1–19. doi: 10.1177/108835769400900301
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Alant, E., & Meiring, E. (2001). The use of a digital voice output device to facilitate language development in a child with developmental apraxia of speech: A case study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(14), 623–634. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11697460
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C. (2000). Improved comprehension of object names following voice output communication aid use: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Anderson, C. J., Hahn, L. J., Obermeier, S. M., & Kapa, L. L. (2014). Eye tracking as a measure of receptive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 147–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N., & Fleming, K. (2012). Development of the Communication Complexity Scale. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 16–28. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0099)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N., Skinner, D., Roberts, J., & Hennon, E. (2006). Communication in young children with fragile X syndrome: A qualitative study of mothers’ perspective. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 353–364. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/033)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Thiemann-Bourque, K., Fleming, K., & Matthews, K. (2013). Predicting language outcomes for children learning augmentative and alternative communication: Child and environmental factors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1595–1612. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0102)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, D., & Demchak, M. (2009). The use of augmentative and alternative communication methods with infants and toddlers with disabilities: A research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 274–286. doi: 10.3109/07434610903384529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. E. & Guralnick, M. J. (2012). International human rights to early intervention for infants and young children with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 25, 270–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunning, K., Gona, J., Newton, C., & Hartley, S. (2014). Caregiver perceptions of children who have complex communication needs following a home-based intervention using augmentative and alternative communication in rural Kenya: An intervention note. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 344–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, J. A., Albritton, E. G., Eaton, B. B., & Montague, J. C. (1990). A comparative study of language delayed preschool children's ability to recall symbols from two symbol systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 202–206.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1997). Fostering early language acquisition and AAC use: Exploring reciprocal influences between children and their environments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (2013). Parents’ reports of patterns of use and exposure to practices associated with AAC acceptance by individuals with Angelman syndrome. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 146–158. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2013.784804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardon, T. A., Wilcox, M. J., & Campbell, P. H. (2011). Caregiver perspectives about assistive technology use with their young children with autism spectrum disorders. Infants & Young Children, 24, 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. S., & Miller, J. F. (1981). Analyzing language and communication in the child. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language and communication analysis and intervention (pp. 159–196). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy, M. H., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L. A., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T., Loganathan, D., & Swettenham, J. (2012). Assessing true and false belief in young children with cerebral palsy through anticipatory gaze behaviours: A pilot study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 2058–2066. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clibbens, J., Powell, G. G., & Atkinson, E. (2002). Strategies for achieving joint attention when signing to children with Down's syndrome. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 309–323. doi: 10.1080/1368282021013628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, C. J., & Marvin, C. A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272. doi: 10.1080/07434610310001598242
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, D. (1986). ISAAC in chains: The future of communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Dicarlo, C. F., & Banajee, M. (2000). Using voice output devices to increase initiations of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 191–199. doi: 10.1177/10538151000230030801
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, S. N., McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2014). Online training for paraeducators to support the communication of young children. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 223–242. doi: 10.1177/1053815114526782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K. D. R., Light, J. C., Speltz, J.C., Fallon, K. A., & Jeffries, L. Z. (2003). The performance of typically developing 21/2 year olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 298–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager, K., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2010). Effects of AAC interventions on communication and language for young children with complex communication needs. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 3, 303–310. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2010-0141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drager, K., Postal, V. J., Carrolus, L., Castellano, M., Gagliano, C., & Glynn, J. (2006). The effect of aided language modeling on symbol comprehension and production in 2 preschoolers with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 112–125. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/012)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., & Wortman Lowe, L. (1986). From reflex to symbol: Describing, explaining, and fostering communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, K. A., Light, J. C., & Paige, T. K. (2001). Enhancing vocabulary selection for preschoolers who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, E. H., & Quinn, E. (2012). Perceptions of communication style and influences on intervention practices for young children with AAC needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 117–126. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2012.677959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flippin, M., Reszka, S., & Watson, L. R. (2010). Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 178–195. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0022)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language scores. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Davis, J. L., Lund, E. M., Goodwyn, F. D., & Simpson, R. L. (2012). Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: Investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Comparisons of intervention components within augmentative and alternative communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4404–4414. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geytenbeek, J. J., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Vermeulen, R. J., & Oostrom, K. J. (2014). Reliability and validity of the C-BiLLT: A new instrument to assess comprehension of spoken language in young children with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 1–15. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.924992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens’, C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens’, C. A., & Crain, S. S. (1987). Overview of nonelectronic eye-gaze communication techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). “Pushes and Pulls” on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 194–208. doi: 10.1080/07434610400010960
   Google Scholar
• Gosnell, J., Costello, J., & Shane, H. (2011). Using a clinical approach to answer “What communication apps should we use?” SIG 12 Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Bjork-Akesson, E., Brodin, J., & Olsson, C. (1995). Communication intervention for persons with profound disabilities: A Swedish perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Björck-Åkesson, E., Wilder, J., & Ylvén, R. (2008). AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 207–219. doi: 10.1080/08990220802387935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1999). Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. The BMJ, 331, 1064–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. J. (2000). Early childhood intervention: Evolution of a system. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. J. (2008)International perspectives on early intervention: A search for common ground. Journal of Early Intervention, 30, 90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, C., Lindsay, G., O’Brien, A., Dipper, L., & Wright, J. (2011). Implementing AAC with children with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A study in rationale underpinning intervention. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11, 120–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01184.x
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Skarakis Doyle, E., & Haaf, R. (1996). Language treatment approach for users of AAC: Experimental single-subject investigation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 230–243.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O. E., & Belfiore, P. J. (2000). Preschoolers with communication impairments play shrinking Kim: An interactive computer storytelling intervention for teaching Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 260–269.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. C., Keppner, K., Schanz, A., & Berg, A. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children: Intervention goals and use of technology. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hyppa Martin, J., Reichle, J., Dimian, A., & Chen, M. (2013). Communication modality sampling for a toddler with Angelman syndrome. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 327–336. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0108)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Cameron, M. (2009). Australian speech-language pathologists’ perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 236–49. doi: 10.3109/07434610903322151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple Disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., & Duncum, J. E. (1995). Comparison of sign alone and in combination with an electronic communication device in early language intervention: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 249–259.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. S., McDonnell, A. P., Nelson, C., & Magnavito, A. (2003). Teaching functional communication skills using augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive settings. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 263–280. doi: 10.1177/105381510302500403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., Nelson, C., Evans, J., & Palazolo, K. (2003). The use of visual supports in teaching young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to initiate interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 86–103. doi: 10.1080/0743461031000112016
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., Reichle, J., & Evans, J. (2004). Supporting augmentative and alternative communication use by beginning communicators with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, S. (2002). Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 15, 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas, K. A., & Lloyd, L. L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prerequisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Hasham, Z. (2010). Effects of parent instruction on the symbolic communication of children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 97–107. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0014)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & McNaughton, D. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 195–204. doi: 10.1080/07434610400006646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, A., Otr, L., Campbell, P. H., & Wilcox, J. (2010). Young children with physical disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23, 169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M., Cuvo, A., Singh, N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, E. R. B., & Cress, C. J. (2011). Indirect facilitation of speech in a late talking child by prompted production of picture symbols or signs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 40–52. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.550062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letto, M., Bedrosian, J. L., & Skarakis-Doyle, E. (1994). Application of Vygotskian developmental theory to language acquisition in a young child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lerna, A., Esposito, D., Conson, M., & Massagli, A. (2014). Long-term effects of PECS on social-communicative skills of children with autism spectrum disorders: A follow-up study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 478–485. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997a). “Communication is the essence of human life”: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997b). “Let's go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative communication interventions really make a difference?: The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Binger, C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1994). Story reading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985a). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I – Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985b). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II – Communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985c). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III – Modes of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2007). AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 204–16. doi: 10.1080/07434610701553635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Drager, K. D., & Nemser, J. G. (2004). Enhancing the appeal of AAC technologies for young children: Lessons from the toy manufacturers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 137–149. doi: 10.1080/07434610410001699735
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüke, C. (2014). Impact of speech-generating devices on the language development of a child with childhood apraxia of speech: a case study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 0, 1–9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.913715
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S. K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III – contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335. doi: 10.1080/02656730701189123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathisen, B., Arthur-Kelly, M., Kidd, J., & Nissen, C. (2009). Using MINSPEAK: A case study of a preschool child with complex communication needs. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4, 376–383. doi: 10.1080/17483100902807112
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., Grodzicki, L., Jones, J., … & Parkin, E. (2006). Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: the performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 269–283. doi: 10.1080/00498250600718621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. & Schultz, A. (1973). Communication boards for cerebral-palsied children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J., & Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1993). AAC: Bonding the uncertain mosaic. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Mathy-Laikko, P. (1989). Augmentative and alternative communication for persons with severe congenital communication disorders: An introduction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Namy, L. (2005). Symbol use and symbolic representation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Newborg, J. (1984). Battelle developmental inventory. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, D., & Hanline, M. F. (2007). Enhancing the alternative and augmentative communication use of a child with autism through a parent implemented naturalistic intervention. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 177–197. doi: 10.1080/10349120701330495
   Google Scholar
• Odom, S., Hanson, M., Blackman, J. A., & Kaul, S. (2003). Early intervention practices across the world. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Olin, A. R., Reichle, J., Johnson, L., & Monn, E. (2010). Examining dynamic visual scene displays: implications for arranging and teaching symbol selection. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 284–297. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0001)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive, M. L., Davis, T. N., Chan, J. M., Lang, R. B., & Dickson, S. M. (2006). The effects of enhanced milieu teaching and a voice output communication aid on the requesting of three children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1505–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., Feuerstein, J. L., Pinder, G. L., & Dowden, P. (2013). Validating dynamic assessment of triadic gaze for young children with severe disabilities. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 1–24. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parette, H. P., & Brotherson, M. J. (2004). Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision making. Infants & Young Children, 17, 355–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, M., Verhoeven, L., de Moor, J., van Balkom, H., & van Leeuwe, J. (2009). Home literacy predictors of early reading development in children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 445–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., & McConachie, H. (1999). Mother – child interaction revisited: Communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 34, 391–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickl, G. (2011). Communication intervention in children with severe disabilities and multilingual backgrounds: Perceptions of pedagogues and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 229–244. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.630021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, D., & Carter, M. (2009). A review of the efficacy of the picture exchange communication system intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1471–1486. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0763-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 363–368.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. A. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children, 18, 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Adamson, L. B. (1997). Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Smith, A., & Barker, R. M. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 53, 350–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Smith, A., Cheslock, M., & Bakeman, R. (2011). Parent perceptions of the language development of toddlers with developmental delays before and after participation in parent-coached language interventions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 111–119. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0087)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, B., & Cress, C. J. (2006). Comparison of standardized assessments for cognitive and receptive communication skills in young children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 100–111. doi: 10.1080/07434610500389629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa-Lugo, L. I., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2008). Effects of parent instruction on communicative turns of Latino children using augmentative and alternative communication during storybook reading. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Fried-Oken, M. (2010). Communication Matrix: A clinical and research assessment tool targeting children with severe communication disorders. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 3, 319–329. doi: 10.3233/PRM-2010-0144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (1989). Tangible symbols: Communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 226–234.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, Y., & Turnbull, A. (2007). Augmentative and alternative communication practice in the pursuit of family quality of life: A review of the literature. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32, 50–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M., Reid, D. H., Behrmann, M. M., & Sutton, K. A. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561–578. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (2003). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–27. doi: 10.1080/0743461032000056450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweigert, P., & Rowland, C. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Barton-Hulsey, A., & Romski, M. (2008). Early intervention, AAC, and transition to school for young children with significant spoken communication disorders and their families. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 92–100. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1079123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sevcik, R., Romski, M., & Adamson, L. (2004). Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 1323–1329. doi: 10.1080/09638280412331280352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C. (1981). Decision making in early augmentative communication system use. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & D. D. Bricker (Eds), Early language: Acquisition and intervention (pp. 389–425). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., & O’Reilly, M. (2003). Effects of speech output on maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 37–47. doi: 10.1080/0743461032000056487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simeonsson, R. J., Björck-Åkessön, E., & Lollar, D. J. (2012). Communication, disability, and the ICF-CY. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 3–10. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.653829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. L., Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., & Bakeman, R. (2011). Parent stress and its relation to parent perceptions of communication following parent-coached language intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 135–150. doi: 10.1177/1053815111405526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Caves, K., McLean, L., Mineo Mollica B., Mirenda, P., Paul-Brown, . . . & Yoder, D. E. (2003). Concerns regarding the application of restrictive “eligibility” policies to individuals who need communication services and supports: A response by the National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Chen, L., Allaire, J. H., & Park, E. (2009). Communication breakdown at home and at school in young children with cerebral palsy and severe disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 20, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Chen, L., & Hoover, K. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahmer, A. C., & Ingersoll, B. (2004). Inclusive programming for toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Outcomes from the children's toddler school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 67–82. doi: 10.1177/10983007040060020201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starble, A., Hutchins, T., Favro, M. A., Prelock, P., & Bitner, B. (1994). Family-centered intervention and satisfaction with AAC device training. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 27, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2007). The effect of color on the recognition and use of line drawings by children with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 44–55. doi: 10.1080/07434610600924457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J., & Linfoot, K. (1996). Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 244–254.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J, Rios, M., & Poirier, M-A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, K., Sigafoos, J., Woodyatt, G., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. (2004). Evaluating parent use of functional communication training to replace and enhance prelinguistic behaviours in six children with developmental and physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1241–1254. doi: 10.1080/09638280412331280253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. (2009). The effects of color cues on typically developing preschoolers’ speed of locating a target line drawing: Implications for augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1422–1431. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schuit, M., Segers, E., van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2011). Early language intervention for children with intellectual disabilities: a neurocognitive perspective. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Schuit, M., Segers, E., van Balkom, H., Stoep, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2010). Immersive communication intervention for speaking and non-speaking children with intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 203–18. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.505609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Brekke, K. M., Sjøthun, B., & Grindheim, E. (2005). Constructing preschool communities of learners that afford alternative language development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 82–100. doi: 10.1080/07434610500103541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Øvreeide, K. D., Jørgensen, K. K., Ormhaug, B. M., Oxholm, B., & Warme, R. (2004). Acquisition of graphic communication by a young girl without comprehension of spoken language. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 1335–1346. doi: 10.1080/09638280412331280370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: a meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 117–31. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2013.785020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore, A. S., Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (2014). Early augmented language intervention for children with developmental delays: Potential secondary motor outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 200–212. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.940466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Hennig, S. (2007). The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 69, 58–69. doi: 10.1002/mrdd
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2012). Early childhood development and disability: A discussion paper. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. A., Kaiser, A. P., Reikowsky, D. I., & Roberts, M. Y. (2013). Effects of a naturalistic sign intervention on expressive language of toddlers with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 994–1008. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0060)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, P., & Stone, W. L. (2006). A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 698–711. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/051)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar