References
- Chalmers T C, Matta R J, Smith H, Kunzler A M. Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1977; 297: 1091–6
- Sacks H S, Berrier J, Reitman D, Ancova-Berk V A, Chalmers T C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 450–5
- Sacks H S, Reitman D, Pagano D, Kupelnick B. Metaanalysis: an update. Mt Sinai J Med 1996; 63: 216–24
- Assendelft W JJ, Koes B W, Knipschild P G, Bouter L M. The relationship between methodological quality and conclusions in reviews of spinal manipulation. JAMA 1995; 274: 1942–8
- Jadad A R, McQuay H J. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 235–43
- Chalmers T C, Celano P, Sacks H S, Smith H. Bias in treatment asignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1358–61
- Schulz K F, Chalmers I, Hayes R J, Altman D G. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408–12
- Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook D J, Jadad A R, Moher M, et al. Does the quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998; 352: 609–13
- Moher D, Cook D J, Jadad A R, Tugwell P, Moher M, Jones A, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. Health Technol Assess Rep, (in press)
- Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its ocurrence. JAMA 1990; 263: 1385–9
- Sterling T D, Rosenbaum W L, Weinkam J J. Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to publish and vice versa. Am Statistician 1995; 49: 108–12
- Simes R J. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4: 1529–41
- Song F, Gilbody S. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis. BMJ 1998; 316: 471
- Moher D, Pham B, Klassen T P, Schulz K F, Berlin J A, Jadad A R, et al. Does the Language of Publication of Reports of Randomized Trials Influence the Estimates of Intervention Effectiveness Reported in Meta-analyses? Technical report. Thomas C Chalmers Centre for Systematic Reviews, Ottawa, Ont 1998
- Cook D J, Witt L G, Cook R J, Guyatt G H. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the critically ill: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1991; 91: 519–27
- Tryba M. Prophylaxis of stress ulcer bleeding: a metaanalysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1991; 13: 44–55, Suppl 2
- Cook D J, Reeve B K, Guyatt G H, Heyland D K, Griffith L E, Buckingham L, et al. Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: resolving discordant meta-analyses. JAMA 1996; 275: 308–14
- Villar J, Carroli G, Belizan J M. Predictive ability of metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials. Lancet 1995; 345: 772–6
- LeLorier J, Gregroire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 536–42