Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research

References

• McDonald S, Taylor L, Adams C. Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Libr Rev 1999;16:151–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eyers J. Searching bibliographic database effectively. Health Policy Plan 1998;13:339–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson M, Perrin R. A comparison of CINAHL and MEDLINE CD-ROM in four allied health areas. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1994;82:214–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fishman DL, Stone VL, DiPaula B. Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Medline. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1996;84:402–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown CM. Complementary use of the SciSearch database for improved biomedical information searching. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998;86:63–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minozzi S, Pistotti V, Forni M. Searching for rehabilitation articles on MEDLINE and EMBASE. An example with cross-over design Med Rehabil 2000;81:720–22.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez-Almazor M, Belseck E, Homik J, Dogan M, Remos-Remus C. Identifying clinical trials in medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:476–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen P, Kaplan S, Levy J. Mapping the literature of nursing: 1996–2000. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:206–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson M, Barrowman N, Moher D, Klassen T, Pham B, Platt R, . Should meta-analyses search EMBASE in addition to MEDLINE? J Clin Epidemiolog 2003;56:943–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins T, Gillies R, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches. Can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Can Fam Physician 2005;51:848–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brazier H, Begley C. Selecting a database for literature searches in nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL? J Adv Nurs 1996;24:868–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettle AJ. Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2001;89:353–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gehanno JF, Paris C, Thirion B, Caillard JF. Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology. Occup Environ Med 1998;55:562–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read EJ, Smith RC. Searching for library and information science literature: A comparison of coverage in three databases. Library Computing 2000;19:118–26.
   Google Scholar
• Fact Sheet. What's the Difference Between MEDLINE® and PubMed®? [Internet]. Bethesda: The National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health; c2008 [cited 2009 August 29]. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html.
   Google Scholar
• PubMed [Internet]. Bethesda: The National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health; c2007 [cited 2007 November 10]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?DB=pubmed.
   Google Scholar
• PubMed Help [Internet]. Bethesda: The National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health; c2007 [cited 2007 November 10]. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=helppubmed.section.pubmedhelp. Appendices#pubmedhelp.How_PubMed_works_aut.
   Google Scholar
• EBSCOhost [Internet]. Ipswich, MA: EBSCO Publishing; 2007 [cited 2008 Jan 22]; Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com.
   Google Scholar
• EBSCO Support [Internet]. Ipwich: EBSCO Industries Inc [cited 2008 Jan 22]. Available at: http://support.epnet.com/knowledge_ base/detail.php?id=3425.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Scientific [Internet]. Thomson Reuters; 2006 [cited 2008 Oct 9]. Available at: http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/products/wos/.
   Google Scholar
• Miettunen J, Jääskeläinen E. Sex differences in Wisconsin schizotypy scales—A meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 2008;doi: 10.1093/ schbul/sbn075.
   Google Scholar
• Miettunen J, Veijola J, McGrath J, Saha S, Heikkinen J, Isohanni M, Lauronen E. Recovery from schizophrenia—A meta-analysis. Schiz-ophr Res 2008;98:74–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kastner M, Straus SH, McKibbon A, Goldsmith CH. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:149–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eady AM, Wilczynski NL, Haynes BR, Hedges Team. PsycINFO search strategies indetified methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and researchers. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire G, Derderian F, Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:159–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen P, Isohanni M. Bias against European journals in medical publication databases. Lancet 1999;353:1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczynski N, Haynes R, Team Hedges. Optimal search strategies for identifying mental health content in MEDLINE: An analytic survey. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2006;5:4–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Horsley T. Managing database overlap in systematic reviews using Batch Citation Matcher: Case studies using Scopus. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:461–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Topfer LA, Parada A, Menon D, Noorani H, Perras C, Serra-Prat M. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999;15:297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinahl information systems. Products & services [Internet]. Ipwich: EBSCO Industries Inc; c2005 [cited 2009 Jan 24]. Available at: http://www.cinahl.com/prodsvcs/prodsvcs.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ERIC Educational Resources Information Center. [Internet]. Washington: ERIC Project; [cited 2009 Jan 24]. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• EMBASE [Internet]. Elsevier B. V.; c2007 [cited 2009 Jan 24]. Available at: http://www.info.embase.com.
   Google Scholar
• Schoones J. Improving literature searches. Radiol 2007;1:243.
   Google Scholar
• Wong S, Wilczynski N, Haynes B. Comparison of top-performing search strategies for detecting clinically sound treatment studies and systematic reviews in MEDLINE and EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:451–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D, Trewheellar K. MEDLINE and EMBASE complement each other in literature searches. BMJ 1998;316:1166.
   Google Scholar
• ScienceDirect info [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V.; c2007 [cited 2009 Jan 24]. Available at: http://www.info.sciencedirect.com/content.
   Google Scholar
• Meho L, Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings on LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2007;58:2105–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindhu F, Dickson R. The complexity of searching the literature. Int J Nurs Pract 1997;73:211–7.
   Google Scholar