Technologies for Anatomical and Geometric Characterization of the Corneal Structure and Anterior Segment: A Review

References

• Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ. Anterior segment biometry: A study and review of resolution and repeatability data. J Refract Surg 2012;28(7):509–520
   Google Scholar
• Mireskandari K, Tehrani NN, Vandenhoven C, Ali A. Anterior segment imaging in pediatric ophthalmology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(12):2201–2210
   Google Scholar
• Hahn P, Migacz J, O'Connell R, et al. The use of optical coherence tomography in intraoperative ophthalmic imaging. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42(Suppl):S85–S94
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Abou Shousha M, Perez VL, et al. Ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging the anterior segment of the eye. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42(Suppl):S15–S27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dada T, Gadia R, Sharma A, et al. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2011;56(5):433–450
   Google Scholar
• Bianciotto C, Shields CL, Guzman JM, et al. Assessment of anterior segment tumors with ultrasound biomicroscopy versus anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 200 cases. Ophthalmology 2011;118(7):1297–1302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira CM, Ribeiro C, Franco S. Corneal imaging with slit-scanning and Scheimpflug imaging techniques. Clin Exp Optom 2011;94(1):33–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiernan DF, Mieler WF, Hariprasad SM. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: A comparison of modern high-resolution retinal imaging systems. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149(1):18–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jancevski M, Foster CS. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Semin Ophthalmol 2010;25(5–6):317–323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomão MQ, Esposito A, Dupps WJ Jr. Advances in anterior segment imaging and analysis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20(4):324–332
   Google Scholar
• Dorairaj S, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Quantitative evaluation of anterior segment parameters in the era of imaging. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007;105:99–108 ; discussion 108–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnalich F, Piñero D, Alió JL. Fundamentals in corneal topography. In: Mastering the Techniques of LASIK, EPILASIK and LASEK (Techniques and Technologies) (Garg A, Alió JL, Pajic B, Mehta CK, Eds.); New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd., 2007
   Google Scholar
• Rand R, Howland H, Applegate R. Mathematical model of a Placido disk keratometer and its implications for recovery of corneal topography. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:926–930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Applegate R. Comment: Inherent error in corneal topography/Roberts. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994;10:113–114
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC, Diez-Cuenca M, Pinero DP. Repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature measurements by combined scanning-slit and placido-disc topography after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1918–1926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng AC, Rao SK, Lam DS. Accuracy of Orbscan II in the assessment of posterior curvature in patients with myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 2007;23:677–680
   Google Scholar
• Ueda T, Nawa Y, Masuda K, et al. Posterior corneal surface changes after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:2084–2087
   Google Scholar
• Nawa Y, Masuda K, Ueda T, et al. Evaluation of apparent ectasia of the posterior surface of the cornea after keratorefractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:571–573
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski DM, Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Chang JS Jr. Model for nonectatic increase in posterior corneal elevation after ablative procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:72–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilforoushan MR, Speaker M, Marmor M, et al. Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:623–631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura R, Negishi K, Saiki M, et al. No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1104–1110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti HS, Craig JP, Brahma A, et al. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbscan slit-scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1823–1828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskander NG, Anderson Penno E, Peters NT, et al. Accuracy of Orbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:681–685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessler S, Duncker GI. Orbscan pachymetry after LASIK is not reliable. J Refract Surg 2001;17:385–387
   Google Scholar
• Prisant O, Calderon N, Chastang P, et al. Reliability of pachymetric measurements using orbscan after excimer refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2003;110:511–515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18:325–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, et al. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:127–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalbán R, Piñero DP, Javaloy J, Alió JL. Intrasubject repeatability of corneal morphology measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:971–977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:787–792
   Google Scholar
• Bedei A, Appolloni I, Madesani A, et al. Repeatability and agreement of 2 Scheimpflug analyzers in measuring the central corneal thickness and anterior chamber angle, volume, and depth. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012;22(Suppl 7):S29–S32
   Google Scholar
• Nasser CK, Singer R, Barkana Y, et al. Repeatability of the Sirius imaging system and agreement with the Pentacam HR. J Refract Surg 2012;28:493–497
   Google Scholar
• Savini G, Carbonelli M, Barboni P, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability of automatic measurements performed by a dual Scheimpflug analyzer in unoperated and post-refractive surgery eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:302–309
   Google Scholar
• Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Zamani M, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior elevation map measurements between 2 Scheimpflug imaging systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:856–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM, Cerviño A, Yebra-Pimentel E, Parafita MA. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:125–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscia F, La Tegola MG, Alessio G, Sborgia C. Accuracy of Orbscan optical pachymetry in corneas with haze. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:253–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Skorpik C. Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:858–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milla M, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Alió JL. Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system: Intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:310–316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S, Rollins AM, Roth JE, et al. Real-time optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment at 1310 nm. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1179–1185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller M, Dahmen G, Pörksen E, et al. Anterior chamber angle measurement with optical coherence tomography: Intraobserver and interobserver variability. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1803–1808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslanides IM, Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, et al. High-frequency ultrasound spectral parameter imaging of anterior corneal scars. CLAO J 1995;21:268–272
   Google Scholar
• Avila M, Li Y, Song JC, Huang D. High-speed optical coherence tomography for management after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1836–1842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baikoff G, Lutun E, Wei J, Ferraz C. Contact between 3 phakic intraocular lens models and the crystalline lens: an anterior chamber optical coherence tomography study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2007–2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baikoff G, Lutun E, Ferraz C, Wei J. Static and dynamic analysis of the anterior segment with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1843–1850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Char DH, Kundert G, Bove R, Crawford JB. 20MHz high frequency ultrasound assessment of scleral and intraocular conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:632–635
   Google Scholar
• García-Feijoó J, Hernández-Matamoros JL, Castillo-Gómez A, et al. High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy of silicone posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1940–1946
   Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Couch DG, Archer T. Direct residual stromal thickness measurement for assessing suitability for LASIK enhancement by Artemis 3D very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc scanning. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1884–1888
   Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Sutton HFS, Coleman DJ. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery: Anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery. Ophthalmology 1999;106:474–482
   Google Scholar
• Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ. Three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasonic parameter imaging of anterior segment pathology. Ophthalmology 1995;102:837–843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Chabi A, et al. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging of the posterior segment. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1344–1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scan lateral dimension measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1799–1802
   Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Plaza AB, Alió JL. Anterior segment biometry with 2 imaging technologies: Very-high-frequency ultrasound scanning versus optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:95–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar