Whisker-related circuitry in the trigeminal nucleus principalis: Ultrastructure

References

• Abdel-Majid RM, Leong WL, Schalkwyk LC, Smallman DS, Wong ST, Storm DR, Fine A, Dobson MJ, Guernsey DL, Neumann PE. 1998. Loss of adenylyl cyclase I activity disrupts patterning of mouse somatosensory cortex. Nat Genet 19:289–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arends JJA, Jacquin MF. 1993. Lucifer yellow staining in fixed brain slices: Optimal methods and compatibility with somatotopic markers in neonatal brain. J Neurosci Meth 50:321–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae YC, Ihn HJ, Park MJ, Ottersen OP, Moritani M, Yoshida A, Shigenaga Y. 2000. Identification of signal substances in synapses made between primary afferents and their associated axon terminals in the rat trigeminal sensory nuclei. J Comp Neurol 418:299–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae YC, Park KS, Bae JY, Palk SK, Ahn DK, Moritani M, Yoshida A, Shigenaga Y. 2005. GABA and glycine in synaptic microcircuits associated with physiologically characterized primary afferents of cat trigeminal principal nucleus. Exp Brain Res 162:449–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belford GR, Killackey HP. 1979. Vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat. J Comp Neurol 183:305–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett-Clarke CA, Chiaia NL, Jacquin MF, Rhoades RW. 1992. Parvalbumin and calbindin immunocytochemistry reveal functionally distinct cell groups and vibrissa-related patterns in the trigeminal brainstem complex of the adult rat. J Comp Neurol 320:323–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cases OI, Seif F, Grimsby P, Gaspar K, Chen S, Pournin U, Muller M, Aguet C, Babinet J, Shih C, et al. 1996. Aggressive behavior and altered amounts of brain serotonin and norepinephrine in mice lacking MAOA. Science 268:1763–1766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond ME, Armstrong-James M, Ebner FF. 1992. Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus. J Comp Neurol 318:462–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding YQ, Yin J, Xu HM, Jacquin MF, Chen ZF. 2003. Formation of whisker-related principal sensory nucleus-based lemniscal pathway requires a paired homeodomain transcription factor, Drg11. J Neurosci 23:7246–7254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham D, Woolsey TA. 1984. Effects on neonatal whisker lesions on mouse central trigeminal pathways. J Comp Neurol 233:424–447
   Google Scholar
• Erzurumlu RS, Kind PC. 2001. Neural activity: Sculptor of “barrels” in the neocortex. Trends Neurosci 24:589–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzurumlu RS, Chen ZF, Jacquin MF. 2006. Molecular determinants of the face map development in the trigeminal brainstem. Anat Rec 288:121–134
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg MH, Lee SM, Ebner FF. 2004. The contribution of the principal and spinal trigeminal nuclei to the receptive field properties of thalamic VPM neurons in the rat. J Neurocytol 33:75–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fukuchi-Shimogori T, Grove EA. 2001. Neocortex patterning by the secreted signaling molecule FGF8. Science 294:1071–1074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Chen Y, Ye L. 1992. Electron microscopic demonstration of horseradish peroxidase by the use of tetramethylbenzidine as chromagen and sodium tungstate as stabilizer (TMB-ST method): A tracing method with high sensitivity and well preserved ultrastructural tissue. J Neurosci Meth 42:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallas BH, Jacquin MF. 1990. Structure–function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. IX. Inputs from subnucleus caudalis. J Neurophysiol 64:28–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring J, Henderson TA, Jacquin MF. 1990. Principalis- or parabrachial-projecting spinal trigeminal neurons do not stain for GAD or GABA. Somatosens Mot Res 7:391–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson TA, Jacquin MF. 1995. What makes subcortical barrels? Requisite trigeminal circuitry and developmental mechanisms. In: Jones EG, Diamond IT, editors. Barrel cortex. Vol. 11. New York: Plenum Press. pp 123–187
   Google Scholar
• Iwasoto T, Datwani A, Wolf AM, Nishiyama H, Taguchi Y, Tonegawa S, Knopfel T, Erzurumlu RS, Itohara S. 2000. Cortex-restricted disruption of NMDAR1 impairs neuronal patterns in the barrel cortex. Nature 406:726–731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Mooney RD, Rhoades RW. 1986a. Morphology, response properties, and collateral projections of trigeminothalamic neurons in brainstem subnucleus interpolaris of rat. Exp Brain Res 61:457–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Renehan WE, Klein BG, Mooney RD, Rhoades RW. 1986b. Functional consequences of neonatal infraorbital nerve section in rat trigeminal ganglion. J Neurosci 6:3706–3720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Renehan WE, Mooney RD, Rhoades RW. 1986c. Structure–function relationships in rat medullary and cervical dorsal horns. I. Trigeminal primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 55:1153–1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Woerner D, Szczepanik AM, Riecker V, Mooney RD, Rhoades RW. 1986d. Structure–function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. I. Vibrissa primary afferents. J Comp Neurol 243:266–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Golden J, Panneton WM. 1988. Structure and function of barrel “precursor” cells in trigeminal nucleus principalis. Dev Brain Res 43:309–314
   Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Golden J, Rhoades RW. 1989a. Structure–function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. III. Local circuit neurons. J Comp Neurol 282:24–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Barcia M, Rhoades RW. 1989b. Structure–function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. IV. Projection neurons. J Comp Neurol 282:45–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Chiaia NL, Haring JH, Rhoades RW. 1990a. Intersubnuclear connections within the rat trigeminal brainstem complex. Somatosens Mot Res 7:399–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Rhoades RW. 1990. Structure and response properties of cells in trigeminal subnucleus oralis. Somatosens Mot Res 7:265–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Wiegand M, Renehan WE. 1990b. Structure–function relationships in rat brainstem subnucleus interpolaris. VIII. Cortical inputs. J Neurophysiol 64:3–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, McCasland JS, Henderson TA, Rhoades RW, Woolsey TA. 1993a. 2DG uptake patterns related to single vibrissae during exploratory behaviors in the hamster trigeminal system. J Comp Neurol 332:38–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Renehan WE, Rhoades RW, Panneton WM. 1993b. Morphology and topography of identified primary afferents in trigeminal subnuclei principalis and oralis. J Neurophysiol 70:1911–1936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Rana JZ, Miller MW, Chiaia NL, Rhoades RW. 1996. Development of trigeminal nucleus principalis in the rat: Effects of target removal at birth. Eur J Neurosci 8:1641–1657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquin MF, Arends JJA, Xiang C, Shapiro LA, Ribak CE, Chen ZF. 2008. In DRG11 knockout mice, trigeminal cell death is extensive and does not account for failed brainstem patterning. J Neurosci 28:3577–3585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jhaveri S, Erzurumlu RS, Laywell ED, Steindler DA, Albers KM, Davis BM. 1996. Excess nerve growth factor in the periphery does not obscure development of whisker-related patterns in the rodent brain. J Comp Neurol 374:41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones EG, Diamond IT. 1995. Barrel cortex. Vol. 11. New York: Plenum Press
   Google Scholar
• Killackey HP, Fleming K. 1985. The role of the principal sensory nucleus in central trigeminal pattern formation. Dev Brain Res 22:141–145
   Google Scholar
• Killackey HP, Jacquin MF, Rhoades RW. 1990. Development of somatosensory system structures. In: Coleman JR, editor. Development of sensory systems in mammals. New York: Wiley. pp 403–429
   Google Scholar
• Kutsuwada T, Sakimura K, Manabe T, Takayama C, Katakura N, Kushiya E, Natsume R, Watanabe M, Inoue Y, Yagi T, et al. 1996. Impairment of suckling response, trigeminal neuronal pattern formation, and hippocampal LTD in NMDA receptor e2 subunit mutant mice. Neuron 16:333–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Erzurumlu RS, Chen C, Jhaveri S, Tonegawa S. 1994. Whisker-related neuronal patterns fail to develop in the trigeminal brainstem nuclei of NMDAR1 knockout mice. Cell 76:427–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma PM. 1991. The barrelettes—Architectonic vibrissal representations in the brainstem trigeminal complex of the mouse. I. Normal structural organization. J Comp Neurol 309:161–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier DL, Mani S, Donovan SL, Soppet D, Ressarollo L, McCasland JS, Meiri KF. 1999. Disrupted cortical map and absence of cortical barrels in growth-associated protein (GAP)-43 knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9397–9402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnery BS, Bruno RM, Simons DJ. 2003. Response transformation and receptive field synthesis in the lemniscal trigeminothalamic circuit. J Neurophysiol 90:1556–1570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnery BS, Simons DJ. 2003. Response properties of whisker-associated trigeminothalamic neurons in rat nucleus principalis. J Neurophysiol 89:40–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon YS, Paik SK, Seo JH, Yi HW, Cho YS, Moritani M, Yoshida A, Ahn DK, Kim YS, Bae YC. 2008. GABA- and glycine-like immunoreactivity in axonal endings presynaptic to the vibrissa afferents in the cat trigeminal interpolar nucleus. Neurosci 152:138–145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosconi T, Arends JJA, Jacquin MF. 2013. Null mutations of NT-3 and Bax affect trigeminal ganglion cell number but not brainstem barrelette pattern formation. Somatosens Mot Res 30:114–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Kurata S, Yoshida A, Nagase Y, Moritani M, Takemura M, Bae YC, Shigenaga Y. 1997. Ultrastructural observations of synaptic connections of vibrissa afferent terminals in cat principal sensory nucleus and morphometry of related synaptic elements. J Comp Neurol 389:12–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash N, Vanderhaeghen P, Cohen-Cory S, Frisén J, Flanagan JG, Frostig RD. 2000. Malformation of the functional organization of somatosensory cortex in adult ephrin-A5 knock-out mice revealed by in vivo functional imaging. J Neurosci 20:5841–5847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades RW, Belford GR, Killackey HP. 1987. Receptive-field properties of rat ventral posterior medial neurons before and after selective kainic acid lesions of the trigeminal brain stem complex. J Neurophysiol 57:1577–1600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades RW, Killackey HP, Chiaia NL, Jacquin MF. 1990. Physiological development and plasticity of somatosensory neurons. In: Coleman JR, editor. Development of sensory systems in mammals. New York: Wiley. pp 431–459
   Google Scholar
• Shipley MT. 1974. Response characteristics of single units in the rat’s trigeminal nuclei to vibrissa displacements. J Neurophysiol 37:73–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortland PJ, DeMaro JA, Shang F, Waite PME, Jacquin MF. 1996. Peripheral and central predictors of whisker afferent morphology in the rat brainstem. J Comp Neurol 375:481–501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons DJ, Carvell GE. 1989. Thalamocortical response transformation in the rat vibrissa/barrel system. J Neurophysiol 61:311–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofeeva E, Lavallée P, Arsenault D, Deschênes M. 2004. Synthesis of multiwhisker receptive fields in subcortical stations of the vibrissa system. J Neurophysiol 91:1510–1515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veinante P, Deschenes M. 1999. Single- and multi-whisker channels in the ascending projections from the principal trigeminal nucleus in the rat. J Neurosci 19:5085–5095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H. 1970. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of the mouse cerebral cortex. Brain Res 17:205–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolsey TA. 1990. Peripheral alteration and somatosensory development. In: Coleman JR, editor. Development of sensory systems in mammals. New York: Wiley. pp 461–516
   Google Scholar
• Woolston DC, LaLonde JR, Gibson JM. 1983. Corticofugal influences in the rat on responses of neurons in the trigeminal nucleus interpolaris to mechanical stimulation. Neurosci Lett 36:43–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang C, Zhang KH, Johnson RL, Jacquin MF, Chen ZF. 2010. The transcription factor, Lmx1b, is necessary for the development of the principal trigeminal nucleus-based lemniscal pathway. Mol Cell Neurosci 44:394–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar