Morphologic Assessment for Glaucoma in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) Trial

REFERENCES

• Holbrook JT, Jabs DA, Sugar EA. The multicenter uveitis steroid treatment trial: rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):550–561
   Google Scholar
• Sallam A, Sheth HG, Habot-Wilner Z, Lightman S. Outcome of raised intraocular pressure in uveitic eyes with and without a corticosteroid-induced hypertensive response. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;148(2):207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Nazm N, Dubey S, Gandhi M, Pegu J. Re: Outcome of raised intraocular pressure in uveitic eyes with and without a corticosteroid-induced hypertensive response. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):525–526; author reply 526-527.
   Google Scholar
• Callanan DG, Jaffe GJ, Martin DF, Pearson PA, Comstock TL.Treatment of posterior uveitis with a fluocinolone acetonide implant: three-year clinical trial results. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;126(9):1191–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe GJ, Martin D, Callanan D, Pearson PA, Levy B, Comstock T;, Fluocinolone Acetonide Uveitis Study Group.Fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) for noninfectious posterior uveitis: thirty-four-week results of a multicenter randomized clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):1020–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen L. Ocular fundus photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;57:13–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):786–806.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hubbard LD, Danis RP, Neider MW, et al.; Age-Related Eye Disease 2 Research Group. Brightness, contrast, and color balance of digital versus film retinal images in the age-related eye disease study 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Aug;49(8):3269–3282.
   Google Scholar
• Klein BE, Moss SE, Magli YL, Klein R, Hoyer C, Johnson J. Optic disc cupping: prevalence findings from the WESDR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989 Feb;30(2):304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Klein BE, Moss SE, Magli YL, Klein R, Hoyer C, Johnson J. Optic disc cupping: four year follow-up from the WESDR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989 Feb;30(2):310–315.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG.The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Bergua A, Schmitz-Valckenberg P, Papastathopoulos KI, Budde WM. Ranking of optic disc variables for detection of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jun;41(7):1764–1773.
   Google Scholar
• Crowston JG, Hopley CR, Healey PR, Lee A, Mitchell P; Blue Mountains Eye Study. The effect of optic disc diameter on vertical cup to disc ratio percentiles in a population based cohort: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jun;88(6):766–770.
   Google Scholar
• Healey PR, Mitchell P, Smith W, Wang JJ. Relationship between cup–disc ratio and optic disc diameter: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997 May;25 Suppl 1:S99–101.
   Google Scholar
• Durmus M, Karadag R, Erdurmus M, Totan Y, Feyzi Hepsen I. Assessment of cup-to-disc ratio with slit-lamp funduscopy, Heidelberg Retina Tomography II, and stereoscopic photos. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan–Feb;19(1):55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasundera T, Danesh-Meyer HV, Donaldson M, Gamble G. Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;33(3):259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:350–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish RK 2nd, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al.; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Test-retest reproducibility of optic disk deterioration detected from stereophotographs by masked graders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;140(4):762–764.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer WJ, Parrish RK 2nd, Schiffman JC, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chew EY, Kim J, Sperduto RD, et al.Evaluation of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Clinical Lens Grading System AREDS Report No. 31. Ophthalmology. 2010 Nov;117(11):2112–2119.
   Google Scholar
• Scott IU, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, et al.; Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Study Group. Agreement between clinician and reading center gradings of diabetic retinopathy severity level at baseline in a phase 2 study of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2008 Jan;28(1):36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg DV, Holbrook JT, Hubbard LD, Davis MD, Jabs DA, Holland GN; Studies of Ocular Complications of AIDS Research Group. Clinician versus reading center assessment of cytomegalovirus retinitis lesion size. Ophthalmology. 2005 Apr;112(4):559–566.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuele N, Klein R, Moritz T, et al.; VADT Study Group. Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Sep–Oct;23(5):323–329.
   Google Scholar
• Klein BE, Moss SE, Magli YL, Klein R, Johnson JC, Roth H. Optic disc cupping as clinically estimated from photographs. Ophthalmology. 1987 Nov;94(11):1481–1483.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer WJ, Parrish RK 2nd, Schiffman JC, et al.. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: reproducibility of cup/disk ratio measurements over time at an optic disc reading center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992 Feb;99(2):215–221.
   Google Scholar
• Breusegem C, Fieuws S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T. Agreement and accuracy of non-expert ophthalmologists in assessing glaucomatous changes in serial stereo optic disc photographs. Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):742–746.
   Google Scholar