Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: complications, diagnosis and possible treatment options: a review

References

• Sultan C, Biason-Lauber A, Philibert P. Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser syndrome: recent clinical and genetic findings. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009;25:8–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppelt PG, Lermann J, Strick R, et al. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindarajan M, Rajan RS, Kalyanpur A, Ravikumar. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci 2008;1:83–5
   Google Scholar
• Wani MM, Mir SA. Chronic kidney disease in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Indian J Nephrol 2010;20:214–16
   Google Scholar
• Weijenborg PT, ter Kuile MM. The effect of a group programme on women with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. BJOG 2000;107:365–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lermann J, Mueller A, Wiesinger E, et al. Comparison of different diagnostic procedures for the staging of malformations associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 2011;96:156–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morcel K, Camborieux L, Programme de Recherches sur les Aplasies Mulleriennes, Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007;2:13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borruto F, Camoglio FS, Zampieri N, Fedele L. The laparoscopic Vecchietti technique for vaginal agenesis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007;98:15–19
   Google Scholar
• Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004;233:19–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittock ST, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Lteif A. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser anomaly and its associated malformations. Am J Med Genet A 2005;135:314–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acien P, Galan F, Manchon I, et al. Hereditary renal adysplasia, pulmonary hypoplasia and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a case report. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010;5:6
   Google Scholar
• Carlomagno G, Di Blasi A, Monica MD. Congenital scoliosis associated with agenesis of the uterine cervix. Case report. BMC Womens Health 2004;4:4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strubbe EH, Cremers CW, Dikkers FG, Willemsen WN. Hearing loss and the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Am J Otol 1994;15:431–6
   Google Scholar
• Letterie GS, Vauss N. Mullerian tract abnormalities and associated auditory defects. J Reprod Med 1991;36:765–8
   Google Scholar
• Cremers CW, Strubbe EH, Willemsen WN. Stapedial ankylosis in the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:800–3
   Google Scholar
• Kula S, Saygili A, Tunaoglu FS, Olgunturk R. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome associated with pulmonary stenosis. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:570–2
   Google Scholar
• Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. Psychological distress in women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, MRKH). Psychosomatics 2009;50:277–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laggari V, Diareme S, Christogiorgos S, et al. Anxiety and depression in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2009;30:83–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller-Boersma JG, Edmonds DK, Schmidt UH. A cognitive behavioural model and therapy for utero-vaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky–Kuster-Hauser syndrome: MRKH). Behav Cogn Psychother 2009;37:449–67
   Google Scholar
• Eun Kwon H, Taylor HS. The role of HOX genes in human implantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004;1034:1–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodale C, Ceccarelli S, Giuliano M, et al. Gene expression profile of patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: new insights into the potential role of developmental pathways. PLoS One 2014;9:e91010
   Google Scholar
• Biason-Lauber A, Konrad D, Navratil F, Schoenle EJ. A WNT4 mutation associated with Mullerian-duct regression and virilization in a 46,XX woman. N Engl J Med 2004;351:792–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi A, Stewart CA, Wang Y, et al. Beta–Catenin is essential for Mullerian duct regression during male sexual differentiation. Development 2011;138:1967–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philibert P, Biason-Lauber A, Rouzier R, et al. Identification and functional analysis of a new WNT4 gene mutation among 28 adolescent girls with primary amenorrhea and mullerian duct abnormalities: a French collaborative study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:895–900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledig S, Brucker S, Barresi G, et al. Frame shift mutation of LHX1 is associated with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Hum Reprod 2012;27:2872–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo RE, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH. Magnetic resonance evaluation of Mullerian remnants in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Korean J Radiol 2013;14:233–9
   Google Scholar
• Kara T, Acu B, Beyhan M, Gokce E. MRI in the diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013;19:227–32
   Google Scholar
• Pandey B, Hamdi IM. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome of Mullerian agenesis [corrected]. Saudi Med J 2003;24:532–4
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds DK, Rose GL, Lipton MG, Quek J. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a review of 245 consecutive cases managed by a multidisciplinary approach with vaginal dilators. Fertil Steril 2012;97:686–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MH. Non-surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis using a simplified version of Ingram's method. Yonsei Med J 2006;47:892–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E, Naim M, Badawy SZ. Mullerian agenesis with vaginal vault prolapse following mechanically created neovagina. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2012;25:e75–6
   Google Scholar
• Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, et al. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in Complete Androgen Insensitivity syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2020–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;140:867–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callens N, Weyers S, Monstrey S, et al. Vaginal dilation treatment in women with vaginal hypoplasia: a prospective one-year follow-up study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014. Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E, Christopoulos P. Creation of a neovagina after Creatsas modification of Williams vaginoplasty for the treatment of 200 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1848–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E, Tsimaris P, et al. Successful pregnancy in a Swyer syndrome patient with preexisting hypertension. Fertil Steril 2011;96:e83–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, et al. The laparoscopic Vecchietti's modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:e371–6
   Google Scholar
• Kaloo P, Cooper M. Laparoscopic-assisted Vecchietti procedure for creation of a neovagina: an analysis of five cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;42:307–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veronikis DK, McClure GB, Nichols DH. The Vecchietti operation for constructing a neovagina: indications, instrumentation, and techniques. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:301–4
   Google Scholar
• Ismail IS, Cutner AS, Creighton SM. Laparoscopic vaginoplasty: alternative techniques in vaginal reconstruction. BJOG 2006;113:340–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzo A, Lagana AS, Sturlese E, et al. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: embryology, genetics and clinical and surgical treatment. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2013;2013:628717
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giannesi A, Marchiole P, Benchaib M, et al. Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2954–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Frontino G, Motta F, et al. Creation of a neovagina in Rokitansky patients with a pelvic kidney: comparison of long-term results of the modified Vecchietti and McIndoe techniques. Fertil Steril 2010;93:1280–5
   Google Scholar
• Imparato E, Alfei A, Aspesi G, et al. Long-term results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in a consecutive series of 62 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007;18:1465–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat J, Ahmed I, Pandey A, et al. Vaginal agenesis: Experience with sigmoid colon neovaginoplasty. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2010;15:19–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Parlak O, et al. Intestinal vaginoplasty: seven years' experience of a tertiary center. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2312–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanowicz W, Starzyk J, Sulislawski J. Laparoscopic vaginal reconstruction using a sigmoid colon segment: a preliminary report. J Urol 2004;171:2632–5
   Google Scholar
• Darai E, Toullalan O, Besse O, et al. Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky's syndrome. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2454–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, et al. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Sex Health 2011;8:427–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, et al. Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls. J Urol 2007;177:1107–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raya-Rivera AM, Esquiliano D, Fierro-Pastrana R, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous vaginal organs in patients: a pilot cohort study. Lancet 2014. Epub ahead of print
   Google Scholar