Is assessment of anti-mullerian hormone and/or antral follicle count useful in the prediction of ovarian response in expected normal responders treated with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists? A prospective observational study

References

• Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, et al; group Is. Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:26–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, et al. Definition EwgoPOR ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1616–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, et al. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1768–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, et al. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2006;85:112–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akande VA, Fleming CF, Hunt LP, et al. Biological versus chronological ageing of oocytes, distinguishable by raised FSH levels in relation to the success of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2003–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SM, La Marca A. The journey from the old to the new AMH assay: how to avoid getting lost in the values. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:411–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustamov O, Smith A, Roberts SA, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone: poor assay reproducibility in a large cohort of subjects suggests sample instability. Hum Reprod 2012;27:3085–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CH, Chen YC, Wu HH, et al. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone predicts ovarian response and cycle outcome in IVF patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:383–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardo LG, Gelbaya TA, Wilkinson H, et al. Circulating basal anti-Mullerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1586–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, et al. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 2005;112:1384–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee J, Schats R, McDonnell J, et al. Evaluation of anti-Mullerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2008;90:737–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Hopkisson J, et al. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2010;93:855–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z. Early follicular antimullerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2006;85:592–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, et al. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 2005;20:3178–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. Prediction of high ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: anti-Mullerian hormone versus small antral follicle count (2-6 mm). J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:319–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broer SL, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, et al. AMH and AFC as predictors of excessive response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Batcha M, et al. The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Mullerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan K, Hilwah N, Kendall NR, et al. Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment? Hum Reprod 2007;22:1932–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arce JC, La Marca A, Mirner Klein B, et al. Antimullerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1644–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar