Computing loss of efficiency in optimal Bayesian decoders given noisy or incomplete spike trains

References

• Ahmadian Y, Pillow J, Paninski L. Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for decoding population spike trains. Neural Computation 2011; 23: 46–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldworth Z, Miller J, Gedeon T, Cummins G, Dimitrov A. Dejittered spike-conditioned stimulus waveforms yield improved estimates of neuronal feature selectivity and spike-timing precision of sensory interneurons. Journal of Neuroscience 2005; 25: 5323–5332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarasingham A, Harrison MT, Hatsopoulos NG, Geman S. Conditional modeling and the jitter method of spike re-sampling. Journal of Neurophysiology 2012; 107: 517–531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese A, Paninski L. Kalman filter mixture model for spike sorting of non-stationary data. Journal of neuroscience methods 2011; 196: 159–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger R, 2001. Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Kloosterman F, Layton S, Wilson MA, 2012. Transductive neural decoding for unsorted neuronal spikes of rat hippocampus. In Proc. IEEE EMBC ‘12, pp. 1310–1313, San Diego, CA
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Vijayan S, Barbieri R, Wilson MA, Brown EN. Discrete-and continuous-time probabilistic models and algorithms for inferring neuronal up and down states. Neural Computation 2009; 21: 1797–1862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossart R, Aronov D, Yuste R. Attractor dynamics of network up states in the neocortex. Nature 2003; 423: 283–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escola S, Fontanini A, Katz D, Paninski L. Hidden Markov models for the stimulus-response relationships of multistate neural systems. Neural Computation 2011; 23: 1071–1132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faisal A, Laughlin S. Stochastic simulations on the reliability of action potential propagation in thin axons. PLoS Comput Biol 2007; 3(5)e79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faisal AA, White JA, Laughlin SB. Ion-channel noise places limits on the miniaturization of the brains wiring. Curr Bio 2005; 15: 1143–1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruhwirth-Schnatter S, 2006. Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models. Springer
   Google Scholar
• Goldwyn JH, Shea-Brown E, Rubinstein JT. Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli - a point process analysis. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 2010; 28(3)405–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollisch T. Estimating receptive fields in the presence of spike-time jitter. Network 2006; 17(2)103–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman IN, Johnson DH, 2008. Information theoretic bounds on neural prosthesis effectiveness: The importance of spike sorting. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008. ICASSP 2008. IEEE International Conference on
   Google Scholar
• Haslinger R, Klinkner K, Shalizi C. The computational structure of spike trains. Neural Computation 2010; 22: 121–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst JA, Gammeter S, Ferrero D, Hahnloser R. Spike sorting with hidden markov models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008; 174(1)126–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill DN, Mehta SB, Kleinfeld D. Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals. Journal of Neuroscience 2011; 31(24)8699–8705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn RA. Topics in matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYUSA 1986
   Google Scholar
• Kass R, Ventura V, Brown E. Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005; 94: 8–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki M. A review of methods for spike sorting: The detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 1998; 9: R53–R78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishchenko Y, Paninski L. Efficient methods for sampling spike trains in networks of coupled neurons. Annals of Applied Statistics 2011; 5: 1893–1919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishchenko Y, Vogelstein J, Paninski L. A Bayesian approach for inferring neuronal connectivity from calcium fluorescent imaging data. Annals of Applied Statistics 2011; 5(2B)1229–1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naud R, Gerstner W. Coding and decoding with adapting neurons: A population approach to the peri-stimulus time histogram. Plos Computational Biology 2012; 8(10)e1002711
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nossenson N, Messer H. Optimal sequential detection of stimuli from multi-unit recordings taken in densely populated brain regions. Neural Computation 2011; 24(4)895–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohki K, Chung S, Ch'ng Y, Kara P, Reid C. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 2005; 433: 597–603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paninski L, Pillow J, Lewi J. Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. Progress in Brain Research 2007; 165: 493–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow J, Ahmadian Y, Paninski L. Model-based decoding, information estimation, and change-point detection techniques for multineuron spike trains. Neural Computation 2011; 23(1)1–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiner L. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989; 77(2)257–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert CP, Casella G. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer Texts in Statistics). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc, Secaucus, NJUSA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sahani M, 1999. Latent variable models for neural data analysis. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, Wood F, Paninski L, 2012. Low rank continuous-space graphical models. In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), pp 1064–1072
   Google Scholar
• Tokdar S, Xi P, Kelly RC, Kass RE. Detection of bursts in extracellular spike trains using hidden semi-markov point process models. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 2010; 29: 203–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoizumi T, Rad K, Paninski L. Mean-field approximations for coupled populations of generalized linear model spiking neurons with Markov refractoriness. Neural computation 2009; 21(5)1203–1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truccolo W, Eden U, Fellows M, Donoghue J, Brown E. A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble and extrinsic covariate effects. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005; 93: 1074–1089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura V. Spike train decoding without spike sorting. Neural computation 2008; 20(4)923–963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura V. Automatic spike sorting using tuning information. Neural Computation 2009; 21: 2466–2501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidne M, Ahmadian Y, Shlens J, Pillow J, Kulkarni J, Litke A, Chichilnisky E, Simoncelli E, Paninski L. Modeling the impact of common noise inputs on the network activity of retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 2012; 33: 97–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood F, Black M. A nonparametric Bayesian alternative to spike sorting. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008; 173: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar