Three-dimensional models of cochlear implants: A review of their development and how they could support management and maintenance of cochlear implant performance

References

• Adunka O, Kiefer J. 2006. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 135(3):374–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque AAS, Rossato M, De Oliveira JAA, Hyppolito MA. 2009. Understanding the anatomy of ears from guinea pigs and rats and its use in basic otologic research. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 75(1):43–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner W-D, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi J-S. 2008. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation. Laryngoscope. 118(9):1630–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black RC, Clark GM, Tong YC, Patrick JF. 1983. Current distributions in cochlear stimulation. Ann NY Acad Sci. 405:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, LindstrA m B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, et al. 1996. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neuro-Otol. 1(5):293–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boëx C, de Balthasar C, Maria-Izabel K, Pelizzone M. 2003. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems. J Acoust Soc Am. 114(4):2049–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein FL. 1997. Shape and the information in medical images: a decade of the morphometric synthesis. Comput Vision Image Understanding. 66(2):97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. 2000a. 3D mesh generation to solve the electrical volume conduction problem in the implanted inner ear. Simul Pract Theory. 8(1–2):57–73.
   Google Scholar
• Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. 2000b. Field patterns in a 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res. 148(1–2):18–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. 2005. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res. 205(1–2):143–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. 2006. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res. 214(1–2):17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, Irlicht LS, White MW, O’Leary SJ, Clark GM. 2000. Renewal-process approximation of a stochastic threshold model for electrical neural stimulation. J Comput Neurosci. 9(2):119–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, White MW, Irlicht LS, O’Leary SJ, Clark GM. 1999a. The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46(12):1393–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, White MW, Irlicht LS, O’Leary SJ, Dynes S, Javel E, Clark GM. 1999b. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46(6):617–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon MWJ. 1976. Electrical impedances, current pathways, and voltage sources in the guinea pig cochlea. Syracuse (NY): Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University.
   Google Scholar
• Ceresa M, Mangado N, Andrews RJ, Gonzalez Ballester MA. 2015. Computational models for predicting outcomes of neuroprosthesis implantation: the case of cochlear implants. Mol Neurobiol. 52(2):934–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi A, Mohan C, Mahajan SB, Kakkar V. 2006. Imaging of cochlear implants. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 16:385–392.
   Google Scholar
• Choi CTM, Hsu CH. 2009. Conditions for generating virtual channels in cochlear prosthesis systems. Ann Biomed Eng. 37(3):614–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CTM, Lai WD, Chen YB. 2005. Comparison of the electrical stimulation performance of four cochlear implant electrodes. IEEE Trans Magn. 41(5):1920–1923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CTM, Lai WD, Lee SS. 2006. A novel approach to compute the impedance matrix of a cochlear implant system incorporating an electrode-tissue interface based on finite element method. IEEE Trans Magn. 42(4):1375–1378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi CTM, Wang SP. 2014. Modeling ECAP in cochlear implants using the FEM and equivalent circuits. IEEE Trans Magn. 50(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen LT. 2009. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA. Hear Res. 247(2):100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Community TA-CI. 2008. Cochlear Implant Statistics [accessed 2015 Nov 12]. http://aslci.blogspot.co.za/2008/03/cochlear-implant-statistics.html.
   Google Scholar
• Connor SE, Bell DJ, O’Gorman R, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. 2009. CT and MR imaging cochlear distance measurements may predict cochlear implant length required for a 360 degrees insertion. AJNR. 30(7):1425–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang K, Clerc M, Vandersteen C, Guevara N, Gnansia D. 2015. In situ validation of a parametric model of electrical field distribution in an implanted cochlea. International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering 2015 April 22-24; The Corum, Montpellier, France; NER; p. 667–670.
   Google Scholar
• De Quesada S. 1995. Statistics and notes about cochlear implants as of 1995 [accessed 2015 Nov 12]. http://www.zak.co.il/d/deaf-info/old/ci-facts.
   Google Scholar
• Disorders NIoDaOC. 2014. Cochlear Implants [accessed 2015 Nov 10]. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/pages/coch.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan WR, Oleson JJ, Gfeller K, Crosson J, Driscoll VD, Won JH, Anderson ES, Rubinstein JT. 2015. Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 54(2):114–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon E, Högstorp H, Wadin K, Rask-Andersen H. 2009. Variational anatomy of the human cochlea: implications for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 30(1):14–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escudé B, James C, Deguine O, Cochard N, Eter E, Fraysse B. 2006. The size of the cochlea and predictions of insertion depth angles for cochlear implant electrodes. Audiol Neurotol. 11(Suppl. 1):27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, Neely GJ, Hullar TE, Skinner MW. 2008. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol. 29(7):920–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley CC, Wilson BS, White MW. 1990. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: Miller JM, Spelman FA, editors. Cochlear implants. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag Inc.; p. 55–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman AJ. 2012. Imaging and anatomy for cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 45(1):1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredelake S, Hohmann V. 2012. Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 287(1–2):76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Grote JJ. 2001. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 22(3):340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Schoonhoven R. 2000a. Integrated use of volume conduction and neural models to simulate the response to cochlear implants. Simul Pract Theory. 8(1–2):75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, Briaire JJ, Schoonhoven R. 2000b. Integrated use of volume conduction and neural models to simulate the response to cochlear implants. Simul Pract Theory. 8:75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, de Snoo SL, Schoonhoven R. 1995. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res. 87(1–2):170–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, de Snoo SL, Ten Kate JH. 1996. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res. 95(1–2):33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS. 1993. Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 102(12):909–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girzon G. 1987. Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes [ Msc]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Govindasamy R. 2012. Modelling subject-specific electrically evoked auditory neural responses in the guinea pig [Masters dissertation]. [Pretoria]: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species – 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am. 87:2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner W, Franz P, Hamzavi J, Plenk H Jr, Baumgartner W, Czerny C. 1999. Intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. Acta Otolaryngol. 119(2):229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom T. 2001. Three-dimensional spiraling finite element model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Ear Hear. 22(4):300–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom T. 2005. Modelling encapsulation tissue around cochlear implant electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput. 43(1):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley DEH, Vongpaisal T, Xu J, Shepherd RK, King AJ, Isaiah A. 2010. Bilateral cochlear implantation in the ferret: a novel animal model for behavioral studies. J Neurosci Methods. 190(2):214–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann R, Klinke R. 1990. Response characteristics of nerve fibres to patterned electrical stimulation. In: Miller JM, Spelman FA, editors. Cochlear implants. Models of the electrically stimulated ear. New York (NY): Springer; p. 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh S, Farhadi M, Daneshi A, Emamdjomeh H. 2002. The effects of age on auditory speech perception development in cochlear-implanted prelingually deaf children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 126(5):524–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatsushika SI, Shepherd RK, Tong YC, Clark GM, Funasaka S. 1990. Dimensions of the scala tympani in the human and cat with reference to cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 99:871–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irving S, Trotter MI, Fallon JB, Millard RE, Shepherd RK, Wise AK. 2013. Cochlear implantation for chronic electrical stimulation in the mouse. Hear Res. 306:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaiah A, Vongpaisal T, King AJ, Hartley DEH. 2014. Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation. J Neurosci. 34(33):11119–11130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke M, Moser T. 2015. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants. Hear Res. 322:224–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone BM, Johnstone JR, Pugsley ID. 1966. Membrane resistance in endolymphatic walls of the first turn of the guinea-pig cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am. 40(6):1398–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DM, Frijns JHM. 2014a. Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res. 315C:10–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DMT, Frijns JHM. 2014b. Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res. 315:10–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM. 2015. Current focussing in cochlear implants: an analysis of neural recruitment in a computational model. Hear Res. 322:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang S, Chwodhury T, Moon IJ, Hong SH, Yang H, Won JH, Woo J. 2015. Effects of electrode position on spatiotemporal auditory nerve fiber responses: a 3D computational model study. Comput Math Methods Med. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kendi TK, Arikan OK, Koç C. 2004. Magnetic resonance imaging of cochlear modiolus: determination of mid-modiolar area and modiolar volume. J Laryngol Otol. 118(7):496–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketten DR. 1994. The role of temporal bone imaging in cochlear implants. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2(5):401–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Neely JG. 1998a. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 175(Suppl):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ketten DR, Skinner MW, Wang G, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Neely JG. 1998b. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 175:1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kral A, Hartmann R, Mortazavi D, Klinke R. 1998. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res. 121:11–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krombach GA, van den Boom M, Di Martino E, Schmitz-Rode T, Westhofen M, Prescher A, Gunther RW, Wildberger JE. 2005. Computed tomography of the inner ear: size of anatomical structures in the normal temporal bone and in the temporal bone of patients with Meniere’s disease. Eur Radiol. 15(8):1505–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JI, Witte RJ, Driscoll CL, Shallop JK, Beatty CW, Primak AN. 2007. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Otol Neurotol. 28(5):658–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau H, Ruys AJ, Carter P, Wang X, Li Q. 2011. Subject-specific modelling of electrical conduction in the body: a case study. J Biomimet Biomater Tissue Eng. 1314(10):45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Le Breton A, Jegoux F, Pilet P, Godey B. 2015. Micro-CT scan, electron microscopy and optical microscopy study of insertional traumas of cochlear implants. Surg Radiol Anat. 37(7):815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CF, Li GJ, Wan SY, Lee WJ, Tzen KY, Chen CH, Song YL, Chou YF, Chen YS, Liu TC. 2010. Registration of micro-computed tomography and histological images of the guinea pig cochlea to construct an ear model using an iterative closest point algorithm. Ann Biomed Eng. 38(5):1719–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li PMMC, Wang H, Northrop C, Merchant SN, Nadol JB Jr. 2007. Anatomy of the round window and hook region of the cochlea with implications for cochlear implantation and other endocochlear surgical procedures. Otol Neurotol. 28(5):641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Gao XL, Yin HX, Luo SQ, Lu J. 2007. A detailed 3D model of the guinea pig cochlea. Brain Struct Funct. 212(2):223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maarefvand M, Marozeau J, Blamey PJ. 2013. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability. Int J Audiol. 52(6):424–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malherbe TK, Hanekom T, Hanekom JJ. 2013. Can subject-specific single-fibre electrically evoked auditory brainstem response data be predicted from a model? Med Eng Phys. 35(7):926–936.
   Google Scholar
• Malherbe TK, Hanekom T, Hanekom JJ. 2015a. Constructing a three-dimensional electrical model of a living cochlear implant user’s cochlea. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. doi:10.1002/cnm.2751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malherbe TK, Hanekom T, Hanekom JJ. 2015b. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models. Hear Res. 327:126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Monedero R, Niparko JK, Aygun N. 2011. Cochlear coiling pattern and orientation differences in cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol. 32(7):1086–1093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx M, Risi F, Escude B, Durmo I, James C, Lauwers F, Deguine O, Fraysse B. 2014. Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 271(4):673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melhem ER, Shakir H, Bakthavachalam S, MacDonald CB, Gira J, Caruthers SD, Jara H. 1998. Inner ear volumetric measurements using high-resolution 3D T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging: initial experience in healthy subjects. Am J Neuroradiol. 19(10):1819–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micco AG, Richter CP. 2006. Electrical resistivity measurements in the mammalian cochlea after neural degeneration. Laryngoscope. 116(8):1334–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugasu E, Hans P, Jackson A, Ramsden RT. 1999. The application of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging rendering of the inner ear in assessment for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol. 20(6):752–757.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naganawa S, Ito T, Iwayama E, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Nakashima T, Ichinose N. 1999. MR imaging of the cochlear modiolus: area measurement in healthy subjects and in patients with a large endolymphatic duct and sac. Radiology. 213(3):819–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. 2014. Science capsule: cochlear implants [accessed 2015 Nov 10]. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/about/plans/2012-2016/Pages/Science-Capsule-Cochlear-Implants.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Neri E, Caramella D, Cosottini M, Zampa V, Jackson A, Berrettini S, Sellari-Franceschini S, Bartolozzi C. 2000. High-resolution magnetic resonance and volume rendering of the labyrinth. Eur Radiol. 10(1):114–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold C, Mergen S, Richardson R, Seligman P, Millard R, Cowan R, Shepherd R. 2014. Impedance changes in chronically implanted and stimulated cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear Implants Int. 15(4):191–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicoletti M, Wirtz C, Hemmert W. 2013. Modeling sound localization with cochlear implants. The technology of binaural listening. New York (NY): Springer; p. 309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Noble JH, Labadie RF, Majdani O, Dawant BM. 2011. Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 58(9):2625–2632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble JH, Rutherford RB, Labadie RF, Majdani O, Dawant BM. 2010. Modeling and segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in conventional CT. Proc. SPIE 7623. doi:10.1117/12.844747.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum D, LaPorta R, Hinger J. 2002. Cochlear implants and sign language. Sharing ideas; 2002 April 11–12. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center; p. 1–85.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary SJ, Black RC, Clark GM. 1985. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modeling and electrophysiological study. Hear Res. 18:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelliccia P, Venail F, Bonafe A, Makeieff M, Iannetti G, Bartolomeo M, Mondain M. 2014. Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 34(1):42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters BR, Wyss J, Manrique M. 2010. Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 120(5):17–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst BE, Donaldson JA, Miller JM, Spelman FA. 1979. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 88(5 I):613–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poznyakovskiy AA, Zahnert T, Kalaidzidis Y, Schmidt R, Fischer B, Baumgart J, Yarin YM. 2008. The creation of geometric three-dimensional models of the inner ear based on micro computer tomography data. Hear Res. 243(1–2):95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattay F. 1986. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 33(10):974–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattay F, Leao RN, Felix H. 2001a. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability. Hear Res. 153(1–2):64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rattay F, Lutter P, Felix H. 2001b. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron: I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes. Hear Res. 153(1–2):43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Rau TS, Hussong A, Herzog A, Majdani O, Lenarz T, Leinung M. 2011. Accuracy of computer-aided geometric 3D reconstruction based on histological serial microgrinding preparation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 14(7):581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebscher SJ, Hetherington AM, Snyder RL, Leake PA, Bonham BH. 2007. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research. J Neurosci Methods. 166(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reda FA, McRackan TR, Labadie RF, Dawant BM, Noble JH. 2014. Automatic segmentation of intra-cochlear anatomy in post-implantation CT of unilateral cochlear implant recipients. Med Image Anal. 18(3):605–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodt T, Ratiu P, Becker H, Bartling S, Kacher DF, Anderson M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. 2002. 3D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images. Neuroradiology. 44(9):783–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein JT. 2004. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Int J Audiol. 43( Suppl. 1):S3–S9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samp C. 2010. Cochlear implants in the deaf community: current circumstances of cochlear implant users among the deaf youth in Sweden’s educational system. Rochester (NY): Rochester Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Seemann MD, Seemann O, Bonél H, Suckfüll M, Englmeier KH, Naumann A, Allen CM, Reiser MF. 1999. Evaluation of the middle and inner ear structures: comparison of hybrid rendering, virtual endoscopy and axial 2D source images. Eur Radiol. 9(9):1851–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz J, Held P, Waldeck A, Strotzer M, Volk M, Strutz J, Feuerbach S. 2001. Value of high-resolution MR in patients scheduled for cochlear implantation. Acta Radiol. 42(6):568–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shpizner BA, Holliday RA, Roland JT, Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH. 1995. Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant. AJNR. 16(7):1517–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, Neely JG, Kletzker GR, Brunsden B, Blocker B. 2002. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in nucleus-22 recipients. JARO. 3(3):332–350.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Vannier MW, Gates GA, Yoffie RL, Kalender WA. 1994. Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. Am J Otol. 15(5):644–651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sladen DP, Zappler A. 2015. Older and younger adult cochlear implant users: speech recognition in quiet and noise, quality of life, and music perception. Am J Audiol. 24(1):31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers J, Briaire JJ, Van Der Veen EH, Kalkman RK, Frijns JHM. 2013. Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants. JARO. 14(5):781–790.
   Google Scholar
• Sobrinho FP, Lazarini PR, Yoo HJ, Abreu Júnior L, de Sá Meira A. 2009. A method for measuring the length of the cochlea through magnetic resonance imaging. Braz. J Otorhinolaryngol. 75(2):261–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spelman FA, Clopton BM, Pfingst BE. 1982. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl (US). 91(Suppl. 98):3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stakhovskaya O, Sridhar D, Bonham BH, Leake PA. 2007. Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants. JARO. 8(2):220–233.
   Google Scholar
• Strelioff D. 1973a. A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. J Acoust Soc Am. 54(3):620–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelioff D. 1973b. A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. J Acoust Soc Am. 54(3):620–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strydom T, Hanekom JJ. 2011. An analysis of the effects of electrical field interaction with an acoustic model of cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 129(4):2213–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha T, Wahba H, Ibrahim AS, AbdElazim Y. 2015. Cochlear implant tailored imaging protocol: what clinicians need to know. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 46(1):33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA. 2011. Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol. 32(6):980–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran P, Sue A, Wong P, Li Q, Carter P. 2014. Development of HEATHER for cochlear implant stimulation using a new modeling workflow. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(2):728–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaid S, Vaid N. 2014. Imaging for cochlear implantation: structuring a clinically relevant report. Clin Radiol. 69(7):e9–e24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Wolterbeek R, Snel-Bongers J, Verbist BM, Frijns JH. 2014. Diversity in cochlear morphology and its influence on cochlear implant electrode position. Ear Hear. 35(1):e9–e20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wermeskerken GK, Prokop M, van Olphen AF, Albers FW. 2007. Intracochlear assessment of electrode position after cochlear implant surgery by means of multislice computer tomography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 264(12):1405–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanpoucke F, Zarowski A, Casselman J, Frijns J, Peeters S. 2004a. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by clarion electrical field imaging. Otol Neurotol. 25(3):282–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanpoucke F, Zarowski A, Peeters S. 2004b. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51(12):2174–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist BM, Ferrarini L, Briaire JJ, Zarowski A, dmiraal-Behloul F, Olofsen H, Reiber JHC, Frijns JHM. 2009. Anatomic considerations of cochlear morphology and its implications for insertion trauma in cochlear implant surgery. Otol Neurotol. 30(4):471–477.
   Google Scholar
• Verbist BM, Joemai RM, Briaire JJ, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJ, Frijns JH. 2010a. Cochlear coordinates in regard to cochlear implantation: a clinically individually applicable 3 dimensional CT-based method. Otol Neurotol. 31(5):738–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist BM, Joemai RMS, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJH, Geleijns J, Frijns JHM. 2008. Evaluation of 4 multisection CT systems in postoperative imaging of a cochlear implant: a human cadaver and phantom study. Am J Neuroradiol. 29(7):1382–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist BM, Skinner MW, Cohen LT, Leake PA, James C, Boex C, Holden TA, Finley CC, Roland PS, Roland JT Jr, et al. 2010b. Consensus panel on a cochlear coordinate system applicable in histologic, physiologic, and radiologic studies of the human cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 31(5):722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Van de Heyning PH, Voormolen M, Kleine Punte A, Schatzer R, Zierhofer C. 2015. Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: change over time. Hear Res. 326:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voie AH, Burns DH, Spelman FA. 1993. Orthogonal-plane fluorescence optical sectioning: three-dimensional imaging of macroscopic biological specimens. J Microsc. 170(3):229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voie AH, Spelman FA. 1995. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochlea from two-dimensional images of optical sections. Comput Med Imaging Graphics. 19(5):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Békésy G. 1951. The coarse pattern of the electrical resistance in the cochlea of the guinea pig (electroanatomy of the cochlea). J Acoust Soc Am. 23(1):18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada H, Sugawara M, Kobayashi T, Hozawa K, Takasaka T. 1998. Measurement of guinea pig basilar membrane using computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction system. Hear Res. 120(1–2):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Vannier MW. 1998. Spiral CT image deblurring for cochlear implantation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 17(2):251–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Northrop C, Burgess B, Liberman MC, Merchant SN. 2006. Three-dimensional virtual model of the human temporal bone: a stand-alone, downloadable teaching tool. Otol Neurotol. 27(4):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westen AA, Dekker DM, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. 2011. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude. Hear Res. 280(1–2):166–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiten DM. 2007. Electro-anatomical models of the cochlear implant. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; p. 225.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting BR, Holden TA, Brunsden BS, Finley CC, Skinner MW. 2008. Use of computed tomography scans for cochlear implants. J Digit Imaging. 21(3):323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won JH, Jones GL, Moon IJ, Rubinstein JT. 2015. Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants. JARO. 16(2):285–307.
   Google Scholar
• Wong P, George S, Tran P, Sue A, Carter P, Li Q. 2016. Development and validation of a high fidelity finite element model of monopolar stimulation in the implanted guinea pig cochlea. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 63(1):188–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong P, Sue A, Tran P, Inguva C, Li Q, Carter P. 2015. Time-domain simulation of volume conduction in the guinea pig cochlea. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses (CIAP). 2015 July 12-17; Granlibakken, Lake Tahoe, USA: Association for Research in Otolaryngology (ARO); p. 217.
   Google Scholar
• Wurfel W, Lanfermann H, Lenarz T, Majdani O. 2014. Cochlear length determination using cone beam computed tomography in a clinical setting. Hear Res. 316:65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Collins LM. 2004. Predicting the threshold of pulse-train electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51(4):590–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo KS, Wang G, Rubinstein JT, Skinner MW, Vannier MW. 2000a. Three-dimensional modeling and visualization of the cochlea on the internet. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 4(2):144–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo SK, Wang G, Collison F, Rubinstein JT, Vannier MW, Kim HJ, Kim NH. 2004. Three-dimensional localization of cochlear implant electrodes using epipolar stereophotogrammetry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 51(5):838–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo SK, Wang G, Rubinstein JT, Vannier MW. 2000b. Three-dimensional geometric modeling of the cochlea using helico-spiral approximation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 47(10):1392–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidman-Zait A. 2010. Quality of life among cochlear implant recipients. In: Stone JH, Blouin M, editors. International encyclopedia of rehabilitation. Buffalo (NY): Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE).
   Google Scholar
• Zeng FG, Rebscher S, Harrison W, Sun X, Feng H. 2008. Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 1:115–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Gan RZ. 2011. A comprehensive model of human ear for analysis of implantable hearing devices. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 58(10 PART 2):3024–3027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhaol T, Hongxia Y, Shuqian L. 2007. Visualization of guinea pig cochlea by computed tomography of diffracttion enhanced imaging. IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering, 2007. CME 2007; 2007 May 23–27; Beijing, China; p. 994–997.
   Google Scholar
• Zou J, Hannula M, Lehto K, Feng H, Lahelma J, Aula AS, Hyttinen J, Pyykko I. 2015. X-ray microtomographic confirmation of the reliability of CBCT in identifying the scalar location of cochlear implant electrode after round window insertion. Hear Res. 326:59–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar