Communication of ionising radiation signals – a tale of two fish

References

• Aarkrog A, Dahlgaard H, Nielsen SP. 1999. Marine radioactivity in the Arctic: A retrospect of environmental studies in Greenland waters with emphasis on transport of 90Sr and 137Cs with the East Greenland Current. Science of the Total Environment 237–238:143–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alberts AC. 1992. Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates. The American Naturalist 139:S1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Amiro BD. 1997. Radiological dose conversion factors for generic non-human biota used for screening potential ecological impacts. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 35:37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladen CL, Flowers MA, Miyake K, Podolsky RH, Barrett JT, Kozlowski DJ, Dynan WS. 2007. Quantification of ionizing radiation-induced cell death in situ in a vertebrate embryo. Radiation Research 168:149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonham K, Welander AD. 1961. Increase in radioresistance of fish to lethal doses with advancing embryonic development. Schultz V, Klement AW, editors. Proceedings of the 1st National Symposium on Radioecology. USA: Reinhold Publishing Corp. and A.I.B.S. pp 353.
   Google Scholar
• Børretzen P, Brown J, Strand P, Johansson E, Ramstedt M, Avila R, Pröhl G, Ulanovsky A, Copplestone D. 2005. The ERICA assessment tool. In: Strand P, Børretzen P, Jølle T, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Radioactivity in the Environment. France: Nice. Norway: Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås. 2–6; 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd M, Ross SC, Dorrens J, Fullerton NE, Tan KW, Zalutsky MR, Mairs RJ. 2006. Radiation-induced biologic bystander effect elicited in vitro by targeted radiopharmaceuticals labeled with alpha-, beta-, and auger electron-emitting radionuclides. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 47:1007–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown VM, Templeton WL. 1964. Resistance of fish embryos to chronic irradiation. Nature 203:1257–1259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castaño A, Gómez-Lechón MJ. 2005. Comparison of basal cytotoxicity data between mammalian and fish cell lines: A literature survey. Toxicology in Vitro 19:5.
   Google Scholar
• Coen N, Kadhim MA, Wright EG, Case CP, Mothersill CE. 2003. Particulate debris from a titanium metal prosthesis induces genomic instability in primary human fibroblast cells. British Journal of Cancer 88(4):548–552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coen N, Mothersill C, Kadhim M, Wright EG. 2001. Heavy metals of relevance to human health induce genomic instability. Journal of Pathology 195(3):293–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun DJ, Alvheim K, Dommarsnes K, Syvertsen C, Sørum H. 2002. Relevance of incubation temperature for Vibrio salmonicida vaccine production. Journal of Applied Microbiology 92:1087–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daev EV. 2007. Stress, chemocommunication and the physiological hypothesis of mutation. Russian Journal of Genetics 43:1082–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Devi PU, Satyamitra M. 2005. Tracing radiation induced genomic instability in vivo in the haemopoietic cells from fetus to adult mouse. British Journal of Radiology 78:928–933.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowling K, Mothersill C. 2001. The further development of rainbow trout primary epithelial cell cultures as a diagnostic tool in ecotoxicology risk assessment. Aquat Toxicol 53:279–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling K, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2005. Delayed cell death and bystander effects in the progeny of Chinook salmon embryo cells exposed to radiation and a range of aquatic pollutants. International Journal of Radiation Biology 81:89–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrova YE. 2003. Radiation-induced transgenerational instability. Oncogene 22:7087–7093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley SA, File AL. 2007. Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biology Letters 3:435–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel DW, Angelovic JW, Davis EM. 1966. Effects of acute gamma irradiation on the blood constituents of pinfish, (Lagondon rhomboides L.) chesapeake. Science 7(2):90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DH. 2006. The physiology of fishes. James B. Claiborne, editor. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster RF, Donaldson LR. 1949. The effect of embryos and young of rainbow trout from exposing the parent fish to X-rays. Growth 13:119–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freshney RI. 2005. Culture of animal cells: A manual of basic technique. 5th ed. USA: Wiley-Liss.
   Google Scholar
• Fukamachi S, Shimada A, Naruse K, Shima A. 2001. Genomic analysis of gamma-ray-induced germ-cell mutations at the b locus recovered from the Medaka specific-locus test. Mutation Research 458:19–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furutani-Seiki M, Wittbrodt J. 2004. Medaka and zebrafish, an evolutionary twin study. Mechanisms of Development 121(7–8):629–637.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowans ID, Lorimore SA, McIlrath JM, Wright EG. 2005. Genotype-dependent induction of transmissible chromosomal instability by gamma-radiation and the benzene metabolite hydroquinone. Cancer Research 65:3527–3530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hei TK, Zhou H, Ivanov VN, Hong M, Lieberman HB, Brenner DJ, Amundson SA, Geard CR. 2008. Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: A unifying model. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 60:943–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herout V, Levinson HZ. 1974. Editorial, low molecular weight substances as regulators in biological systems. Russian Chemical Reviews 43:196–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton T, Brechignac F. 2004. The scientific basis for radiological protection of the environment. In: Brechignac F, Howard BJ, edtors. Paris: IRSN Series.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton TG, Whicker FW. 1997. A screening model approach to determine probable impacts to fish from historic releases of radionuclides. In: Hilton, Desmet, Comans, Blust, deBetencourt, editors. Freshwater and Estuarine Radioecology Studies in Environmental Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 441–448.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt GJ. 1997. Radiation doses to critical groups since the early 1950s due to discharges of liquid radioactive waste from Sellafield. Health Physics 72(4):558–567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 60. 1990. Recommendations of the ICRP. 60 Annals of the ICRP 21:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 91. 2005, A framework for assessing the impact of ionising radiation on non-human species. Annals of the ICRP 33(3):201–270.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103. 2008. New recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP.
   Google Scholar
• Jette CA, Flanagan AM, Ryan J, Pyati UJ, Carbonneau S, Stewart RA, Langenau DM, Look AT, Letai A. 2008. BIM and other BCL-2 family proteins exhibit cross-species conservation of function between zebrafish and mammals. Cell Death and Differentiation 15:1063–1072.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaattari SL, Irwin MJ, Yui MA, Tripp RA, Parkins JS. 1986. Primary in vitro stimulation of antibody production by rainbow trout lymphocytes. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 12:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kari G, Rodeck U, Dicker AP. 2007. Zebrafish: An emerging model system for human disease and drug discovery. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 82:70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauer K, Lampert C, Gonzalez-Valero J. 2007. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo acute fish toxicity in relation to toxicant mode of action. Chemosphere 68:1435–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalchuk O, Baulch JE. 2008. Epigenetic changes and nontargeted radiation effects – is there a link? Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 49:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Dóriga MV, Smail DA, Smith RJ, Doménech A, Castric J, Smith PD, Ellis AE. 2001. Isolation of salmon pancreas disease virus (SPDV) in cell culture and its ability to protect against infection by the ‘wild-type’ agent. Fish Shellfish Immunology 11(6):505–522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorimore SA, Chrystal JA, Robinson JI, Coates PJ, Wright EG. 2008. Chromosomal instability in unirradiated hemaopoietic cells induced by macrophages exposed in vivo to ionizing radiation. Cancer Research 68(19):8122–8126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimore SA, McIlrath JM, Coates PJ, Wright EG. 2005. Chromosomal instability in unirradiated hemopoietic cells resulting from a delayed in vivo bystander effect of gamma radiation. Cancer Research 65:5668–5673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng FM. 1996. Persistent expression of morphological abnormalities in the distant progeny of irradiated cells. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 35:273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairs RJ, Fullerton NE, Zalutsky MR, Boyd M. 2007. Targeted radiotherapy: Microgray doses and the bystander effect. Dose Response 5:204–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAulay IR, Doyle C. 1985. Radiocesium levels in Irish Sea fish and the resulting dose to the population of the Irish Republic. Health Physics 48(3):333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor JF, Newcombe HB. 1972. Decreased risk of embryo mortality following low doses of radiation to trout sperm. Radiation Research 52:536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan WF, Sowa MB. 2007. Non-targeted bystander effects induced by ionizing radiation. Mutation Research 616:159–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Austin B. 2000. Aquatic invertebrate cell culture. Chichester UK: Springer-Praxis.
   Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Austin B. 2003. In vitro methods in aquatic toxicology. Chichester UK: Springer Praxis.
   Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Bucking C, Smith RW, Agnihotri N, O'Neill A, Kilemade M, Seymour CB. 2006. Communication of radiation-induced stress or bystander signals between fish in vivo. Environmental Science and Technology 40:6859–6864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Crean M, Lyons M, McSweeney J, Mooney R, O'Reilly J, Seymour CB. 1998. Expression of delayed toxicity and lethal mutations in the progeny of human cells surviving exposure to radiation and other environmental mutagens. International Journal of Radiation Biology 74:673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Kadhim MA, O'Reilly S, Papworth D, Marsden SJ, Seymour CB, Wright EG. 2000. Dose- and time-response relationships for lethal mutations and chromosomal instability induced by ionizing radiation in an immortalized human keratinocyte cell line. International Journal of Radiation Biology 76:799–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Lyng F, Mulford A, Seymour C, Cottell D, Lyons M, Austin B. 2001. Effect of low doses of ionizing radiation on cells cultured from the hematopoietic tissue of the Dublin Bay prawn, Nephrops norvegicus. Radiation Research 156:241–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Moriarty MJ, Seymour CB. 2005. Bystander and other delayed effects and multi-organ involvement and failure following high dose exposure to ionising radiation. The British Journal of Radiology Supplementary 27:128–131.
   Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2001. Radiation-induced bystander effects: Past history and future directions. Radiation Research 155:759–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2005. Radiation-induced bystander effects: are they good, bad or both. Medicine, Conflict, and Survival 21:101–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2002. Relevance of radiation-induced bystander effects for environmental risk assessment. Radiation Biology of Radioecology 42:585–587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2006a. Radiation-induced by stander and other non-targeted effects: Novel intervention points in cancer therapy. Current Cancer Drug Targets 6:447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2006b. Radiation-induced bystander effects: Evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures? Dose Response 4:283–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothersill C, Smith RW, Agnihotri N, Seymour CB. 2007. Characterization of a radiation-induced stress response communicated in vivo between zebrafish. Environmental Science and Technology 41(9):3382–3387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niiyama H. 1957. Effects of X-irradiation upon Rainbow Trouts (Salmo-irideus) II. Stimulative effects of X-rays on spermatogenesis in fry. Journal of the Faculty of Science 13(1–4):281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Niwa O. 2006. Radiation induced dynamic mutations and transgenerational effects. Journal of Radiation Research (Tokyo) 47(Suppl. B):B25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura T. 2003. Transgenerational carcinogenesis: Induction and transmission of genetic alterations and mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Mutation Research 544(2–3):425–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordland DA, Lewis WJ. 1976. Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2(2):211–220.
   Google Scholar
• Petrusek A, Tollrian R, Schwenk K, Haas A, Laforsch C. 2009. A ‘crown of thorns’ is an inducible defense that protects Daphnia against an ancient predator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:2248–2252.
   Google Scholar
• Prise KM, Folkard M, Michael BD. 2003. A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 104:347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbarbati A, Osculati F. 2006. Allelochemical communication in vertebrates: Kairomones, allomones and synomones. Cells Tissues Organs 18:206–219.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz S, Braunbeck T, Segner H. 1998. Viability and differential function of rainbow trout liver cells in primary culture: Coculture with two permanent fish cells. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Animal 34:762–771.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segner H. 1998. Isolation and primary culture of teleostean hepatocytes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 120A:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Setlow RB. 2004. Historical reflections: A second life in science – working after the age of 65. DNA Repair 3(4):441–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimada A, Shima A, Nojima K, Seino Y, Setlow RB. 2005. Germ cell mutagenesis in Medaka fish after exposures to high-energy cosmic ray nuclei: A human model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 102(17):6063–6067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skelton S. 2007. Viticulture: An introduction to commercial grape growing for wine production. ISBN: 0951470310, 9780951470312.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RW, Mothersill C, Moccia RD, Seymour CB. 2008. Legacy effects of direct exposure to x-rays and to the x-ray induced bystander effect in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.). American Fisheries Society; 8th International Congress on the Biology of Fish. USA: Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RW, Wang J, Bucking CP, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB. 2007. Evidence for a protective response by the gill proteome of rainbow trout exposed to X-ray induced bystander signals. Proteomics 7:4171–4180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow AH, Miksche JP. 1961. Correlation of nuclear volume and DNA [deoxyribonucleic acid] content with higher plant tolerance to chronic radiation. Science 134:282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stabell OB, Ogbebo F, Primicerio R. 2003. Inducible defences in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators. Chemical Senses 28(2):141–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strand JA, Fujihara MP, Burdett RD, Poston TM. 1977. Suppression of the primary immune response in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, sublethally exposed to tritiated water during embryogenesis. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 34(9):1293–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Strand JA, Fujihara MP, Poston TM, Abernethy CS. 1982. Permanence of suppression of the primary immune response in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, sublethally exposed to tritiated water during embryogenesis. Radiation Research 91:533–541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamminga J, Koturbash I, Baker M, Kutanzi K, Kathiria P, Pogribny IP, Sutherland RJ, Kovalchuk O. 2008. Paternal cranial irradiation induces distant bystander DNA damage in the germline and leads to epigenetic alterations in the offspring. Cell Cycle 7(9):1238–1245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tocher DR, Wilson R. 1990. Primary culture of astrocytic glial cells from rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri L., brain. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 33:93–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsyusko O, Yi Y, Coughlin D, Main D, Podolsky R, Hinton TG, Glenn TC. 2007. Radiation-induced untargeted germline mutations in Japanese Medaka. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology 145(1):103–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usenko CY, Harper SL, Tanguay RL. 2008. Fullerene C60 exposure elicits an oxidative stress response in embryonic zebrafish. Toxicology of Applied Pharmacology 229:44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorobtsova IE. 2008. Transgenerational transmission of radiation-induced genomic instability and predisposition to carcinogenesis. Vopr Onkol 54:490–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whicker FW, Schultz V. 1982. Radioecology: Nuclear energy and the environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C, Pärt P. 1997. Cultured branchial epithelia from freshwater fish gills. Journal of Experimental Biology 200(6):1047–1059.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood CM, Kelly SP, Zhou B, Fletcher M, O'Donnell M, Eletti B, Pärt P. 2003. Cultured gill epithelia as models for the freshwater fish gill. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1566:72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wright EG. 2007. Microenvironmental and genetic factors in haemopoietic radiation responses. International Journal of Radiation Biology 83(11–12):813–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Sun H, Tang X, Ji J, Li X, Sun J, Ma Z, Yuan J, Han ZC. 2005. Comparison of cell-suspension and explant culture of rabbit limbal epithelial cells. Experimental Eye Research 80:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar