Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events

References

• AFRRI (Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute). Accessed 10 October 2008 from the website: http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander G, Swartz H, Amundson S, Blakely W, Buddemeier B, Gallez B, Dainiak N, Goans R, Hayes R, Lowry P, Noska M, Okunieff P, Salner A, Schauer D, Trompier F, Turteltaub K, Voisin P, Wiley AJ, Wilkins R. 2007. BiodosEPR-2006 Meeting: Acute dosimetry consensus committee recommendations on biodosimetry applications in events involving uses of radiation by terrorists and radiation accidents. Radiation Measurements 42:972–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger M, Christensen D, Lowry P, Jones O, Wiley A. 2006. Medical management of radiation injuries: Current approaches. Occupational Medicine 56:162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger M, Leonard R, Ricks R, Wiley A, Lowry P, Flynn D. 2008. Hospital triage in the first 24 hours after a nuclear or radiological disaster. Accessed 10 October 2008 from the website: http://orise.orau.gov/reacts/.
   Google Scholar
• Castelain P, Van Hummelen P, Deleener A, Kirsch-Volders M. 1993. Automated detection of cytochalasin-B blocked binucleated lymphocytes for scoring micronuclei. Mutagenesis 8:285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decordier I, Papine A, Plas G, Roesems S, Vande Loock K, Moreno-Palomo J, Cemeli E, Anderson D, Fucic A, Marcos R, Soussaline F, Kirsch-Volders M. 2009. Automated image analysis of cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei: An adapted protocol and a validated scoring procedure for biomonitoring. Mutagenesis 24:85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M. 2000. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutation Research 455:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M, Chang W, Kisch-Volders M, Holland N, Bonassi S, Zeiger E, project HM. 2003. HUMN project: Detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronusleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. Mutation Research 534:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenech M, Morley A. 1985. Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes. Mutation Research 147:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1987. Absorbed dose determination in photon and electron beams: An international code of practice. Technical Report Series 277. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1998. Diagnosis and treatement of radiation injuries. Safety Reports Series No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2001. Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment: A manual. Technical Report No. 405.
   Google Scholar
• Kuniak M, Azizova T, Day R, Wald N, Suyama J, Zhang A, Sumina MV, Pesternikova VS, Vasilenko E, Soaita A, Slaughter DM. 2008. The Radiation Injury Severity Classification system: An early injury assessment tool for the frontline health-care provider. British Journal of Radiology 81:232–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard A, Rueff J, Gerber G, Leonard E. 2005. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 115:448–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd D, Edwards AA, Moquet JE, Guerrero-Carbajal YC. 2000. The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 52:1107–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loong T. 2003. Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain. British Medical Journal 327:716–719.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pala FS, Alkaya F, Tabakçioglu K, Tokatli F, Uzal C, Parlar S, Algünes Ç. 2008. The effects of micronuclei with whole chromosome on biological dose estimation. Turk Biyoloji Dergisi 32:283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Roch-Lefevre S, Vaurijoux A, Voisin P, Martin C, Gregoire E, Voisin P. 2007. Optimization of cytogenetic procedures for population triage in case of radiological emergency. Radiation Measurements 42:1143–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunck C, Johannes T, Varga D, Lörch T, Plesch A. 2004. New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: Unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 104:383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan G, Oestreicher U, Romm H. 2007. Biological dosimetry. chromosomal alterations. In: Obe G, Vijayalaxmi, editors. Heidelberg: Springer. pp 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Thierens H, Vral A, Barbé M, Aoulasalah B, De Ridder L. 1999a. A cytogenetic study of nuclear power plant workers using the micronucleus-centromere assay. Mutation Research 445:105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierens H, Vral A, De Ridder L. 1996. Cytogenetic study of radiological workers: Effect of age, smoking and radiation burden on the micronucleus frequency. Mutation Research 360:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierens H, Vral A, De Ridder L, Touil N, Kirsch-Volders M, Lambert V, Laurent C. 1999b. Inter-laboratory comparison of cytogenetic endpoints for the biomonitoring of radiological workers. International Journal of Radiation Biology 75:23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierens H, Vral A, Morthier R, Aoulasalah B, De Ridder L. 2000. Cytogenetic monitoring of hospital workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation using the micronucleus centromere assay. Mutagenesis 15:245–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas P, Umegaki K, Fenech M. 2003. Nucleoplasmic bridges are a sensitive measure of chromosome rearrangement in the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay. Mutagenesis 18:187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga D, Johannes T, Jainta S, Schwarz-Boeger U, Kiechle M, Garcia BP, Vogel W. 2004. An automated scoring procedure for the micronucleus test by image analysis. Mutagenesis 19:391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaegen F, Vral A, Seuntjens J, Schipper N, De Ridder L, Thierens H. 1994. Scoring of radiation-induced micronuclei in cytokinesis-blocked human-lymphocytes by automated image-analysis. Cytometry 17:119–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voisin P, Benderitter M, Claraz M, Chambrette V, Sorokine-Durm I, Delbos M, Durand V, Leroy A, Paillole N. 2001. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure. Cellular and Molecular Biology 47:557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vral A, Thierens H, De Ridder L. 1997. In vitro micronucleus-centromere assay to detect radiation-damage induced by low doses in human lymphocytes. International Journal of Radiation Biology 71:61–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vral A, Verhaegen F, Thierens H, De Ridder L. 1994a. The in vitro cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay – a detailed description of an improved slide preparation technique for the automated detection of micronuclei in human-lymphocytes. Mutagenesis 9:439–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vral A, Verhaegen F, Thierens H, De Ridder L. 1994b. Micronuclei induced by fast neutrons versus 60Co-rays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. International Journal of Radiation Biology 65:321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vral A, Verhaegen F, Thierens H, De Ridder L. 1994c. Micronuclei induced by fast neutrons versus 60Co γ-rays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. International Journal of Radiation Biology 65:321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins R, Romm H, Kao T, Awa A, Yoshida M, Livingston G, Jenkins M, Oestreicher U, Pellmar T, Prasanna P. 2008. Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events. Radiation Research 169:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Gregoire E, Hayata I, Roy L, Sommer S, Stephan G, Voisin P. 2004. Cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes for the purpose of dose reconstruction: A review of three recent radiation accidents. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 104:200–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar