Sacroiliac joint dysfunction as a reason for the development of acetabular retroversion: a new theory

References

• Bernbeck R 1951 Zur Pathologie der luxatio coxae congenita (On the pathology of congenital dislocation of the hip). Virchows Archov 320: 238–263
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brolinson PG, Kozar AJ, Cibor G 2003 Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports 2: 47–56
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buller LT, Rosneck J, Monaco FM, Butler R, Smith T, Barsoum WK 2012 Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography. American Journal of Sports Medicine 40: 367–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibulka MT 2004 Determination and significance of femoral neck anteversion. Physical Therapy 84: 550–558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cibulka MT, Delitto A 1993 A comparison of two different methods to treat hip pain in runners. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 17: 172–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibulka MT, Delitto A, Koldehoff RM 1988 Changes in innominate tilt after manipulation of the sacroiliac joint in patients with low back pain. An experimental study. Physical Therapy 68: 1359–1363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corten K, Ganz R, Chosa E, Leunig M 2011 Bone apposition of the acetabular rim in deep hips: A distinct finding of global pincer impingement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 93: 10–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandachli W, Islam SU, Liu M, Richards R, Hall-Craggs M, Witt J 2009 Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 91: 1031–1036
   Google Scholar
• Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T 2006 The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 88: 372–379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Sato T, Akiyama M, Iwamoto Y 2012 Acetabular tilt correlates with acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 470: 2827–2835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA 2003 Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 417: 112–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giori NJ, Trousdale RT 2003 Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 417: 263–269
   Google Scholar
• Grant AD, Sala DA, Schwarzkopf R 2012 Femoro-acetabular impingement: The diagnosis-a review. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics 6: 1–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hesch J 1997 Evaluation and treatment of the most common patterns of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R (eds) Movement, stabilty & low back pain, the essential role of the pelvis. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone
   Google Scholar
• Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, Martinez A, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M 2007 Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: High validity of the “cross-over-sign”. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 25: 758–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakaty DK, Fischer AF, Hosalkar HS, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M 2010 The ischial spine sign: Does pelvic tilt and rotation matter? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 468: 769–774
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M 2008 Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: A new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466: 677–683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG, Allen PD 2006 The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 88: 727–729
   Google Scholar
• Kohl S, Hosalkar HS, Mainil-Varlet P, Krueger A, Buechler L, Siebenrock K 2011 Histology of damaged acetabular cartilage in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: An observational analysis. Hip International 21: 154–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohnlein W, Ganz R, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M 2009 Acetabular morphology: Implications for joint-preserving surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 467: 682–691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson CM, Kelly BT, Stone RM 2011 Making a case for anterior inferior iliac spine/subspine hip impingement: Three representative case reports and proposed concept. Arthroscopy 27: 1732–1737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laslett M, Williams M 1994 The reliability of selected pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint pathology. Spine 19: 1243–1249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavignolle B, Vital JM, Senegas J, Destandau J, Toson B, Bouyx P, Morlier P, Delorme G, Calabet A 1983 An approach to the functional anatomy of the sacroiliac joints in vivo. Anatomia Clinica 5: 169–176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lembeck B, Mueller O, Reize P, Wuelker N 2005 Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthopaedica 76: 517–523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leunig M, Beaule PE, Ganz R 2009 The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: Current status and future perspectives. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 467: 616–622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levangie P, Norkin C 2005 Joint structure & function, a comprehensive analysis, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA, F. A. Davis Company
   Google Scholar
• Meissner A, Fell M, Wilk R, Boenick U, Rahmanzadeh R 1996 Biomechanics of the pubic symphysis. Which forces lead to mobility of the symphysis in physiological conditions? Der Unfallchirurg 99: 415–421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell F, Moran P, Pruzzo N 1979 Evaluation and treatment manual of osteopathic muscle energy technique procedures. Ballwin, MO, Mitchell, Moran, and Pruzzo Associates
   Google Scholar
• Monazzam S, Krishnamoorthy V, Bittersohl B, Bomar JD, Hosalkar HS 2013 Is the acetabulum retroverted in slipped capital femoral epiphysis? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 471: 2145–2150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan PM, Anderson AW, Swiontkowski MF 2013 Symptomatic sacroiliac joint disease and radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement. Hip International 23: 212–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray RO 1965 The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. British Journal of Radiology 38: 810–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochoa LM, Dawson L, Patzkowski JC, Hsu JR 2010 Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in a young population with hip complaints is high. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 468: 2710–2714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters CL, Anderson LA, Erickson JA, Anderson AE, Weiss JA 2011 An algorithmic approach to surgical decision-making in acetabular retroversion. Orthopedics 34: 10 . doi:10.3928/01477447-20101123-07
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitkow R 1975 External rotation contracture of the extended hip: A common phenomenon of infancy obscuring femoral neck anteversion and the most frequent cause of out-toeing gait in children. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 110: 139–145
   Google Scholar
• Portinaro NM, Murray DW, Bhullar TP, Benson MK 1995 Errors in measurement of acetabular index. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 15: 780–784
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potter NA, Rothstein JM 1985 Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Physical Therapy 65: 1671–1675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter RB 1966 Role of innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip in the older child. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 48: 1413–1439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schamberger W 2002 The malalignment syndrome, implications for medicine and sport. New York, NY, Churchill Livingstone
   Google Scholar
• Sharp I 1961 Acetabular dysplasia: The acetabular angle. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 43: 268–272
   Google Scholar
• Shi NN, Shen GQ, He SY, Guo RB 2013 X-ray characteristics of sacroiliac joint disorders and its clinical significance. Zhongguo Gu Shang 26: 102–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R 2003 Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: A study of pelves from cadavers. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 407: 241–248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smidt GL, McQuade K, Wei SH, Barakatt E 1995 Sacroiliac kinematics for reciprocal straddle positions. Spine 20: 1047–1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt GL, Wei SH, McQuade K, Barakatt E, Sun T, Stanford W 1997 Sacroiliac motion for extreme hip positions. A fresh cadaver study. Spine 22: 2073–2082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solonen K 1957 The sacro-iliac joint in the light of anatomical, roentgenological and clinical studies. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica (Suppl) 27: 1–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturesson B, Selvik G, Uden A 1989 Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 14: 162–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A 2000 A radiostereometric analysis of the movements of the sacroiliac joints in the reciprocal straddle position. Spine 25: 214–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannast M, Pfannebecker P, Schwab JM, Albers CE, Siebenrock KA, Buchler L 2012 Pelvic morphology differs in rotation and obliquity between developmental dysplasia of the hip and retroversion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 470: 3297–3305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanzer M, Noiseux N 2004 Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: The role of hip impingement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 429: 170–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnis D 1976 Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of X-rays in children and adults. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 119: 39–47
   Google Scholar
• Tonnis D, Heinecke A 1991 Diminished femoral antetorsion syndrome: A cause of pain and osteoarthritis. Jouranl of Pediatric Orthopedics 11: 419–431
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tonnis D, Heinecke A 1999 Acetabular and femoral anteversion: Relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 81: 1747–1770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troelsen A, Romer L, Jacobsen S, Ladelund S, Soballe K 2010 Cranial acetabular retroversion is common in developmental dysplasia of the hip as assessed by the weight bearing position. Acta Orthopaedica 81: 436–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bosse HJ, Lee D, Henderson ER, Sala DA, Feldman DS 2011 Pelvic positioning creates error in CT acetabular measurements. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 469: 1683–1691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser JD, Hillen B, Jonkers A, Klasen HJ 1982 Computerized tomography in hip disorders. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 126: 1172–1176
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walheim GG, Selvik G 1984 Mobility of the pubic symphysis. In vivo measurements with an electromechanic method and a roentgen stereophotogrammetric method. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 191: 129–135
   Google Scholar
• Wan Z, Malik A, Jaramaz B, Chao L, Dorr LD 2009 Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 467: 32–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH, Kalberer F, Zingg PO 2010 Radiographic markers of acetabular retroversion: Correlation of the cross-over sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 76: 166–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson J 1962 Femoral anteversion in the rabbit. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Br) 44: 386–397
   Google Scholar
• Woerman A 1989 Evaluation and treatment of dysfunction in the lumbar-pelvic-hip complex. In: Donatelli R, Wooden M (eds) Orthopaedic physical therapy. New York, NY, Churchill Livingstone
   Google Scholar