Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy

References

• Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook AJ, Drewnowski A. 2011. Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 65:1059–1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barański M, Średnicka-Tober D, Volakakis N, Seal C, Sanderson R, Stewart G, Benbrook C, et al. 2014. Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Brit J Nutr [Online] 112:794–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batte MT, Hooker NH, Haab TC, Beaverson J. 2007. Putting their money where their mouths are: consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Policy 32:145–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows AC, Alcaraz G, Hallman WK. 2010. Gender and food, a study of attitudes in the USA towards organic, local, U.S. grown, and GM-free foods. Appetite 55:540–550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieberstein A, Roosen J, Marette S, Blanchemanche S, Vandermoere S. 2013. Consumer choices for nano-food and nano-packing in France and Germany. Eur Rev Agric Econ 40:73–94
   Google Scholar
• Carter CA. 2002. International approaches to the labeling of genetically modified foods. University of California Giannini Foundation Update 6:1–10
   Google Scholar
• Center for Food Safety: About GE Foods. 2014. Available at: http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/311/ge-foods/about-ge-foods. Accessed on 17 September 2014
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Anders S, An H. 2013. Measuring consumer resistance to a new food technology: a choice experiment in meat packing. Food Qual Prefer 28:418–428
   Google Scholar
• Drewnowski A, Aggarwal A, Hurvitz PM, Monsivais P, Moudon AV. 2012. Obesity and supermarket access: Proximity or price? Am J Public Health 102:74–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Commission – Health and Consumers. 2014. Rules on GMOs in the EU-Labelling. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biotechnology/gmo_labelling_en.htm. Accessed on 17 September 2014
   Google Scholar
• Finucane M, Holup J. 2005. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Soc Sci Med 60:1603–1612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Water Watch. 2013. Superweeds: how biotech crops bolster the pesticide industry. [Online]. Available at: http://documents.foodandwaterwatch.org/doc/Superweeds.pdf. Accessed on 15 November 2013
   Google Scholar
• Frewer L, Gupta N, George S, Fischer A, Giles E, Coles D. 2014. Consumer attitudes to nanotechologies applied to food production. Food Sci Technol. Published online before print. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224414001332. Accessed on 12 January 2014
   Google Scholar
• Frewer L, van der Lans I, Fischer A, Reinders M, Menozzi D, Zhang X, van den Berg I, Zimmermann L. 2013. Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci Technol 30:142–152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GM crops: A story in numbers. 2013. Nature 497:22–23
   Google Scholar
• Gruère GP, Carter CA, Farzin Y. 2008. What labeling policy for consumer choice? The case of genetically modified food in Canada and Europe. Can J Econ 41:1472–1497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman WE, Rousu M, Shogren JF, Tegene A. 2007. The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers’ acceptance of genetically modified foods. J Econ Behav Organ 63:193–206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King NJ. 2003. Low-income consumers, though less aware of genetically modified foods, are concerned and want labels. Calif Agr 57:81–85
   Google Scholar
• Koivisto Hursti UK, Magnussen MK. 2003. Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods. What kind of knowledge matters? Appetite 41:207–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang JT. 2013. Elements of public trust in the American food system: experts, organizations, and genetically modified food. Food Policy 41:145–154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Moore M, House LO, Morrow B. 2002. Influence of brand name and type of modification on consumer acceptance of genetically engineered corn chips: a preliminary analysis. Int Food Agribus Man 4:373–383
   Google Scholar
• Marques M, Critchley C, Walshe J. 2014. Attitudes to genetically modified food over time: how trust in organizations and the media cycle predict support. Public Understanding of Science. Published online before print. Available at: http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/24/0963662514542372. Accessed on 13 January 2014
   Google Scholar
• Martin C. 2013. The psychology of GMO. Curr Biol 23:R356–R359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudon AV, Cook AJ, Ulmer J, Hurvitz PM, Drewnowski A. 2011. A neighborhood wealth metric for use in health studies. Am J Prev Med 41:88–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen C, Thierfelder K, Robinson S. 2003. Consumer preferences and trade in genetically modified foods. J Policy Model 25:777–794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen MDK, Zelaya IA. 2005. Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61:301–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey PP, Kumar BB, Tiwari DK. 2010. Environmental considerations concerning the release of genetically modified organisms. Proenvironment Promediu 3:381–384
   Google Scholar
• Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2005. U.S. vs. EU: an examination of the trade issues surrounding genetically modified food. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts [Online]. Available at: http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/reports/food_and_biotechnology/BiotechUSEU1205pdf.pdf. Accessed on 17 September 2014
   Google Scholar
• Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Zani B. 2012. The prediction of intention to consume genetically modified food: test of an integrated psychosocial model. Food Qual Prefer 25:163–170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab C, Grobe D. 2003. Labeling genetically engineered food: the consumer’s right to know? AgBioForum 6:155–161
   Google Scholar
• Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. (2003) Official Journal of the European Union [Online]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:268:0024:0028:EN:PDF Accessed on 17 September 2014
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Entrena M, Salazar-Ordóñez M. 2013. Influence of scientific–technical literacy on consumers’ behavioural intentions regarding new food. Appetite 60:193–202
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Entrena M, Salazar-Ordóñez M, Sayadi S. 2013. Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in southern Spain consumers. Food Policy 40:44–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe B, Teisl MF. 2007. Genetically modified food labeling: the impacts of message and messenger on consumer perceptions of labels and products. Food Policy 32:49–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollin F, Kennedy J, Wills J. 2011. Review: consumers and new food technologies. Trends Food Sci Tech 22:99–111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotman D. 2014. Why we will need genetically modified foods. MIT Technol Rev 117:28–37
   Google Scholar
• Šorgo A, Jaušovec N, Jaušovec K, Puhek M. 2012. The influence of intelligence and emotions on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms. Electron J Biotechnol 15:1–11
   Google Scholar
• The Non-GMO Project 2014. The “Non-GMO Project Verified” Seal [Online]. Available at: http://www.nongmoproject.org/learn-more/understanding-our-seal/. Accessed on 17 September 2014
   Google Scholar
• Thorne F, Loughran D, Fox S, Mullins E, Wallace M. 2014. Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified potatoes in Ireland: an experimental auction approach. Agricultural Economics Society 88th Annual Conference, AgroParisTech, Paris, France. Available at: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/169746. Accessed on 13 January 2014
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2001. Guidance for industry: voluntary labeling indicating whether foods have or have not been developed using bioengineering; Draft Guidance [Online]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm059098.htm. Accessed on 21 November 2013
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2013. Questions & answers on food from genetically engineered plants. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/biotechnology/ucm346030.htm. Accessed on 17 November 2013
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh JC, Holley JM. 2002. An environmental–economic assessment of genetic modification of agricultural crops. Futures 34:807–822
   Google Scholar
• Vigani M, Olper A. 2013. GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy 43:32–43
   Google Scholar
• Vilojen CD, Marx GM. 2013. The implications for mandatory GM labeling under the Consumer Protection Act in South Africa. Food Control 31:387–391
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Gu H, Yue C, Ahlstrom D. 2013. Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: a simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. Food Policy 42:58–70
   Google Scholar