Where are teachers' voices? A research agenda to enhance the communicative interactions of students with multiple and severe disabilities at school

References

• Foreman P, editor. Inclusion in action. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Thomson Learning Australia; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Carnaby S. Developing good practice in the clinical assessment of people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairment. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 2007;4:88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Arthur M. Parental perspectives on educational programmes for students with high support needs. Eur J Special Needs Educ 2002;17:175–184.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities [internet]. Special interest research group: profound multiple disabilities home page; 2009. http://www.iassid.org/index.php. Last accessed 2 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hourcade J, Pilotte TE, West E, Parette P. A history of AAC for individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 2004;19:235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N, Arthur M. Shifting the focus: emerging priorities in communication programming for students with a severe intellectual disability. Educ Training Mental Retard Dev Disabil 1995;March:41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N, Arthur M, Sigafoos J. Partners in everyday communicative exchanges. Australia: MacLennan & Petty Pty Ltd; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Downing J. Meeting the communication needs of students with severe and multiple disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality 2001;9:147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgart D, Johnson J, Helmstetter E. Augmentative and alternative communication systems for persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S, Smyth King B. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: an Australian perspective. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabil 2004;29:183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda P, Iacono T, Williams R. Communication options for persons with severe and profound disabilities: state of the art and future directions. J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps 1990;15:3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J. Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun 1999;15:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N. Assessment of preverbal communicative abilities in students with severe intellectual disability. Aust N Z J Dev Disabil 1991;17:347–364.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland C. Communication in the classroom for children with dual sensory impairments: studies of teacher and child behaviour. Augment Altern Commun 1990;6:262–274.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Roberts D, Kerr M, Couzens D, Baglioni AJ. Opportunities for communication in classrooms serving children with developmental disabilities. J Autism Other Dev Disabil 1994;24:259–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Patterns among behaviour states, socio-communicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilties. J Dev Phys Disabil 2004;16:125–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Bashinski SM. Enhancing initial communication and responsiveness of learners with multiple disabilities: a tri-focus framework for partners. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 1997;12:105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Socio-communicative variables and behaviour states in students with profound and multiple disabilities: descriptive data from school settings. Educ Training Dev Disabil 2003;38:200–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter M, Hotchkis GD. A conceptual analysis of communicative spontaneity. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2002;27:168–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove N, Bunning K, Porter J. Interpreting the meaning of behaviour by people with intellectual disabilities: theoretical and methodological issues. In: Columbus F, editor. Advances in psychology research. New York: NOVA Science Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M, Butterfield N. Teacher reports about student communication: integrating form and function. Aust N Z J Dev Disabil 1993;18:235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N, Arthur M. Addressing teacher needs and concerns in communication interventions for students with an intellectual disability. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 1994;41:201–212.
   Google Scholar
• McCathren RB. Teacher implemented prelinguistic communication intervention. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabil 2000;15:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tjus T, Heimann M, Nelson KE. Interaction patterns between children and their teachers when using a specific multi-media and communication strategy. Autism 2001;5:175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M, Foreman P, Pascoe S, Butterfield N, Bennett D. Educational programming for students with high support needs: a report of work in progress. Australasian J Spec Educ 1999;23:64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S. The impact of partner training on the communicative involvement of students with multiple and severe disability in special schools. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2007;32:233–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton J, Bronicki GJB, Guess D. Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps 1987;12:211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Carter M, Hook J. Identification of intentional communication in students with SMD. Augment Altern Commun 1998;14:102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M, Butterfield B, McKinnon DH. Communication intervention for students with severe disability: results of a partner training program. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 1998;45:97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers SE, Carter M, Clayton M, Hook J. Education of students with high support needs: teachers' perceptions of possible best practices, reported implementation and training needs. Aust J Special Educ 1998;22:76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Izen C, Brown F. Education and treatment needs of students with profound, multiply handicapping, and medically fragile conditions: a survey of teachers' perceptions. J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps 1991;16:94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon DH, Gordon C. An investigation of teachers' support needs for the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular classrooms. Special Educ Perspect 1999;8:3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G. Special education teacher attitudes toward AAC: preliminary survey. Augment Altern Commun 1997;13:186–198.
   Google Scholar
• McConachie H, Pennington L. In-service training for schools on augmentative and alternative communication. Eur J Disord Commun 1997;32:277–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcmillan J. Teachers make it happen: from professional development to integration of augmentative and alternative communication technologies in the classroom. Australasian J Special Educ 2008;32:199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce SM. Impact of a communication intervention model on teachers' practice with children who are congenitally deaf-blind. J Vis Impairment Blindness 2002;March:154–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind M, Kellett M, Hopkins V. Teachers' talk styles: communicating with learners with severe and complex learning difficulties. Child Lang Teach Ther 2001;17:143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield N, Arthur M, Linfoot K, Phillips S. Creating communicative contexts: an instructional manual for teachers of students with severe intellectual disability. Sydney: N.S.W. Department of School Education; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G, Muller E, Hunt P, Goetz L. Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: an educational team perspective. Augment Alternative Commun 2001;17:62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh JE, Light JC. General education teachers' experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2003;19:104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Soto G, Goetz L. Self-efficacy beliefs and the education of students with severe disabilities. J Assoc Persons Severe Disabil 1998;23:134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt P, Soto G, Maier J, Doering K. Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Except Children 2003;69:315–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings RP. Staff beliefs about the challenging behaviours of children and adults with mental retardation. Clin Psychol Rev 1997;17:775–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvarson L, Meiers M, Beavis A. Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Educ Policy Anal Arch 2005;13:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smidt A, Balandin S, Sigafoos J, Reed V. A communication training programme for residential staff working with adults with challenging behaviour: pilot data on intervention effects. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2007;20:16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AR, Thompson JR, Clay SL, Hutchins M, Vogt WP, Romaniak B, Sokolowski B. Pre-service professionals' attitudes toward children who use augmentative/alternative communication. Educ Training Mental Retard Dev Disabil 2001;36:255–271.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Light J. Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: research review. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter M. Communicative spontaneity in individuals with high support needs: an exploratory consideration of causation. J Disabil Dev Educ 2002;49:225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur-Kelly M, Bochner S, Center Y, Mok M. Socio-communicative perspectives on research and evidence-based practice in the education of students with profound and multiple disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 2008;36:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Forster S, Iacono T. Disability support workers' experience of interaction with a person with profound intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2008;33:137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbeduto L, Evans, J, Dolan, T. Theoretical perspectives on language and communication in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Mental Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2001;17:45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy LV. General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Revised edition. New York: George Braziller; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Packman A, Kuhn L. Looking at stuttering through the lens of complexity. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol 2009;11:77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo E. Introduction to systems philosophy: toward a new paradigm of contemporary thought. New York: Harper & Row; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• De Paepe PA, Wood LA. Collaborative practices related to augmentative and alternative communication: current personnel preparation programs. Commun Disord Q 2001;22:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco MF. Related services research for students with low-incidence disabilities: implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Lang Speech Hearing Schools 2000;31:230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knackendoffel EA. Collaborative teaming in the secondary school, Focus Except Children 2005;37:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnenmeier RM, McSheehan M, Jorgensen M. A case study of team supports for a student with autism's communication and engagement within the general education curriculum: preliminary report of the beyond access model. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathisen B, Arthur-Kelly M, Kidd J, Nissen C. Using MINSPEAK: a case study of a preschool child with complex communication needs. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2009;4:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartas D. Teacher and speech-language therapist collaboration: being equal and achieving a common goal? Child Lang Teach Ther 2004;20:33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke; Macmillan Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow J. Narrative inquiry: musings, methodology and merits. In: Higgs J, editor. Qualitative research: discourse on methodologies. Sydney: Hampden Press; 1997. pp 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler J. Choosing a research approach: matching questions with methodologies. In: Higgs J, editor. Writing qualitative research. Vol. 2. Sydney: Hampden Press; 1998. pp 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman CK. Narrative analysis. New York: Sage Publications; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin DJ, Connelly FM. Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar