Test–retest reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults

References

• King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 1998;78:852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and agreement of 5 ergo-kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1365–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Chan C, Hui-Chan C. Work profile and functional capacity of formwork carpenters at construction sites. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross D, Battie M, Asante A. Evaluation of a short form functional capacity evaluation: less maybe best. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:422–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Attributes of excellence in work related assessments. Work 2003;20:63–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones T, Kumar S. Functional capacity evaluation of manual materials handlers: a review. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand M-J, Brassard B, Hong Q, Lemaire J, Loisel P. Responsiveness of the physical work performance evaluation, a functional capacity evaluation, in patients with low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boadella J, Sluiter j, Frings-Dresen MHW. Reliability of upper extremity tests measured by the ergos work simulator: a pilot study. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13:219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand M-J, Loisel P, Poitras S, Mercier R, Stock S, Lemaire J. The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14:119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay M, Lamb J, Watson R, Young I, Fearon F, Alday J, Tindall A. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicators of sincere effort of the EPIC lift capacity test on a previously injured population. Spine 2000;25:1405–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson L, Rogers L, Kaskutas V, Dakos M. Reliability and reactivity of three new functional assessment measures. Work 2002;18:41–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reneman M, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra P, Geertzen J, Groothoff J. Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14:295–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting W, Wessel J, Brintnell S, Maikala R, Bhambhani Y. Validity of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator in the measurement of lifting endurance in healthy men. Am J Occup Ther 2001;55:184–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reesink D, Jorritsma W, Reneman M. Basis for a functional capacity evaluation methodology for patients with work-related neck disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:436–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Frings-Dresen M. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2004;77:527–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deen M, Gibson L, Strong J. A survey of occupational therapy in Australian work practice. Work 2002;19:219–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cotton A, Schonstein E, Adams R. Use of functional capacity evaluations by rehabilitation providers in NSW. Work 2006;26:287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James C, Mackenzie L. Health professional's perceptions and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations: results of a quantitative survey. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:203–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge J, Burgess-Limerick R. Reliability of the JobFit system pre-employment functional assessment tool. Work 2007;28:299–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 1999;13:107–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Validity of work-related assessments. Work 1999;13:125–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soer R, Gerrits E, Reneman M. Test-retest reliability of a WRULD functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Work 2006;26:273–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuckwell NL, Straker L, Barrett TE. Test-retest reliability on nine tasks of the physical work performance evaluation. Work 2002;19:243–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradbury S, Roberts D. Workhab functional capacity evaluation procedural manual. Australia: WorkHab; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgrefe K, Glenn T. Principles of aerobic exercise. In: Kisner C, Colby L, editors. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 2007. pp. 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Meth Med Res 1999;8:135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Depoy E, Gitlin L. Introduction to Research. Understaning and applying multiple strategies. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Reneman MF, Jaegar SMHJ, Westmaas M, Goeken L. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work 2002;18:23–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloom BS. Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer S, Dijkstra P, Stewart R, Goeken L, Groothoff J, Geertzen J. Comparing self report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:999–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar