Community-based rehabilitation and health professional practice: developmental opportunities and challenges in the global North and South

References

• Barnes C. Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst & Co.; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton JI. Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lang R. The development and critique of the social model of disability. London: Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, United Nations. New York: Department of Social and Economic Affairs; 2007. Electronic Citation. www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf. Last accessed
   Google Scholar
• Kjμr AM. Governance: key concepts series. 72 ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Smith BC. Good governance and development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kroger T. Care research and disability studies: nothing in common? Crit Soc Pol 2009;29:398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Social work: disabled people and disabling environments. Jessica Kingsley Pub; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Sin CH. Medicalising disability? Regulation and practice around fitness assessment of disabled students and professionals in nursing, social work and teaching professions in Great Britain. Disabil Rehabil 2009;1:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Helander E. Prejudice and dignity: an introduction to community-based rehabilitation. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffers I, Finkenflugel HJ. PHC and CBR: concepts for empowerment. In: Finkenflugel HJ, editor. The handicapped community. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Helander E, Mendis P, Nelson G, Goerdt A. Training in the community for people with disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• ILO, UNESCO, WHO. Community-based rehabilitation for and is with people with disabilities. Geneva: ILO, UNESCO, WHO; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• ILO, UNESCO, WHO. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalisation of opportunity, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Geneva: ILO, UNESCO, WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting D. Letter to the editor. Asia Pacif Disabil Rehabil J 1997;8:20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Disability, Poverty and the Millennium Development Goals: Relevance, Challenges and Opportunities for DFID Thomas P. London,: DFID Knowledge and Research Programme on Disability and Development: 2005. Electronic Citation. www.disabilitykar.net/docs/policy_final.doc. Last accessed September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo R, Moore K. Including disabled people in poverty reduction work:” Nothing about us, without us”. World Develop 2003;31:571–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R. Whose reality counts? Purring the first last. London: Intermediate Technology; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• About the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) matrix WHO. Whose reality counts? Purring the first last. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. Electronic Citation. http://www.who.int/disabilities/cbr/CBR%20MATRIX%202008%20update.pdf. Last accessed October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lysack C, Kaufert J. Comparing the origins and ideologies of the independent living movement and community based rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 1994;17:231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scotch RK. Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement. The Milbank Quart 1989;380–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C. Sociologies of disability and mental illness: contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflugel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2007;99999:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver F. Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. J Int Develop 1999;11:597–612.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. London: Zed Books; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Coleridge P. Cultural values and disability: the example of Afghanistan. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research in the majority world. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce W, Lysack C. Community participation: uncovering its meaning in CBR. In: Thomas M, Thomas MJ, editors. Selected readings in CBR Series 2. Bangalore: Occasional publication of the Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lang R. Empowerment and CBR? Issues raised by the south Indian experience. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research on disability in the majority world. Leeds: Disability Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard N, Sakellariou D. Operationalizing community participation in community-based rehabilitation: exploring the factors. Disabil Rehabil 2007;(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M. Community participation in community-based rehabilitation programmes. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007;30:62–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Finkenflugel HJM, Cornielje H. Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of ‘rehabilitation in the community’ programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 2007;99999:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lang R. Empowerment and CBR? Issues raised by the South Indian experence. In: Stone E, editor. Disability and development: learning from action and research in the majority world. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Erb S, Harris-White B. Outcast from social welfare: adult disability and incapacity in rural South India. Bangalore: Books for Change; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly WR. The white man's burden: why the West's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kottak CP, Cernea M. Putting people first: sociological variables in rural development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Alma-Ata Declaration: International Conference on Primary Health Care, 6th–12th September, 1978. Geneva: WHO; 1978. Electronic Citation. http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/declaration_almaata.pdf. Last accessed October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes RAW. Policy network analysis. In: Moran M, Rein M, Goodin RE, editors. The Oxford hanbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The avocacy coalition framework. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Newman J, Vidler E. Discriminating customers, responsible patients, empowered users: consumerism and the modernisation of health care. J Soc Pol 2006;35:193–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespere T. Disability rights and wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge; 2006.
   Google Scholar