Art after stroke: the qualitative experience of community dwelling stroke survivors in a group art programme

References

• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2010. Melburne: National Stroke Foundation; 2010. Report nr ISSBN0-978-0-9805933-3-4.
   Google Scholar
• Khan F, Baguley I, Cameron ID. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Med J Aust 2003;178:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Hackett ML, House AO. Interventions for preventing depression after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD003689.
   Google Scholar
• Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27 (Suppl 1):204–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hahn M, Baum C, Dromerick AW. The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;15:151–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hankey GJ, Jamrozik KJ, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson CS. Long-Term disability after first ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke; 2002;33:1034–1040.
   Google Scholar
• Neau JP, Ingrand P, Mouille-Brachet C, Rosier MP, Couderq C, Alvarez A, Gil R. Functional recovery and social outcome after cerebral infarction in young adults. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:296–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Kotila M, Waltimo O. Quality of life 4 years after stroke. Stroke 1998;19:1101–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh RM, Robinson RG, Lipsey JR, Starkstein SE, Federoff MD, Price R. The impact of post stroke depression on recovery in activities of daily living over a 2-year follow-up. Arch Neurol 1990;47:785–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm J, Osborne RH, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RA, Thrift AG. Brief comprehensive quality of life assessment after stroke: the assessment of quality of life instrument in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). J Am Heart Assoc 2002;33:2888–2894.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman-Maeir A, Soroker N, Ring H, Avni N, Katz N. Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996;334:835–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2004–2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson K, Hyndman D, Ashburn A. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1555–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Smith G. Self-efficacy and quality of life after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs 2002;34:91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes de Leon CF, Seeman T, Baker DI, Richardson ED, Tinetti ME. Self-efficacy, physical decline, and change in functioning in community-living elders: a prospective study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1996;54:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Angus J. A review of evaluation in community based art for health activity in the UK. London: Health Development Agency; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Putland C. Practicing arts and health: What's in a name. Artwork Mag 2003;(57):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Lim KH. Contribution of visual art-making to the subjective well-being of women living with cancer: a qualitative study. Arts Psychother 2007;34:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking S, Secker J, Spandler H, Kent L, Shenton J. Evaluating the impact of participatory art projects for people with mental health needs. Health Social Care Community 2008;16:638–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staricoff RL. Arts in health: a review of the medical literature. London: Arts Council England; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey HL, Nobel J. The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature Am J Public Health 2010;100:254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonen JR, Soroker N. Art therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a model of short-term gorup treatment. Arts Psychother 2000; 27:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern EF. Advanced focus group research. Thousands oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research: exploring the meanings of health and illness. J Health Psychol 1998;3:329–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor MC. Interviewing. Qualitative research in health care. In: Holloway I, editor. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill International; 2005. pp 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pandit N. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method. Qual Rep 1996;2:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Vivat B, Prior S. Women's experiences of increasing subjective well-being in CFS/ME through leisure-based arts and crafts activities: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1279–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Prior S. A lifestyle coat-hanger’: a phenomenological study of the meanings of artwork for women coping with chronic illness and disability. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:785–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côté R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1035–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J, Rochette A. A national survey of occupational therapists' practices related to participation post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveen U, Thommessen B, Bautz-Holter E, Wyller TB, Laake K. Well-being and instrumental activities of daily living after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P, Bode R, Min L, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:950–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Desrosiers J. Coping with the consequences of a stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman SR. Stroke rehabilitation and the negotiation of identify. Qualitative gerontologyIn: Reinharz S, Rowles GD, editors. New York: Springer Publishing; 1998. pp 82–103.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle D. Clinical ethnography of lacunar stroke: implications for acute care. J Neurosci Nurs 1991;23:235–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar