Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment

References

• Mace R. Universal design: housing for the lifespan of all people. Rockville, MD:Department of Housing and Urban Development; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Ginnerup S. Achieving full participation through universal design. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lord J, Posarac A, Nicoli M, Peffley K, McClain-Nhlapo C, Keogh M. Disability and international cooperation and development: areview of policies and practices. Geneva: World Bank, Social Protection Discussion Paper 1003, WB; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sneider H,Takeda N. Design for all: implications for bank operations. Geneva: The World Bank; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff E. Universal design: the new paradigm. In: Preiser W, Ostroff E, editors. Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp 1.3–1.12.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R, Hall P. Inclusive design. London: Routledge; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• CrewsDE, ZavotkaS. Aging, disability, and frailty: implications for universal design.J Physiol Anthropol 2006;25:113–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Froyen H, Verdonck E, De Meester D, Heylighen A. Universal design patterns. AustralasMed J 2009;13:199–203.
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. Universal design for learning.J SpecEduc Tech 2001;16:66–67
   Google Scholar
• Lid IM. What can be achieved by universal design?An investigation of various aspects of the concept.FORMakademisk 2009;17:17–27
   Google Scholar
• Pullin G. Design meets disability. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser W. Towards universal design evaluation. In: Preiser W,Ostroff E, editors. Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp 9.1–9.13.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro J. No pity: people with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: New York Times Books; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Zames Fleischer D,Zames F. The disability rights movement: from charity to confrontation. Philadelphia, PA Temple University Press2001.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra R. The politics of the disability rights movement. ZNet; 2001. Available at: http://www.zcommunications.org/the-politics-of-the-disability-rights-movement-by-ravi-malhotra
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Disability and the city. London and New York Sage Publications1996.
   Google Scholar
• Colker R. The disability pendulum: the first decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York New York University Press2005.
   Google Scholar
• Heyer K. A disability lens on socio-legal research: reading rights of inclusion from a disability studies perspective. Law SocInq 2007;32:261–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire J, Scott S,Shaw S. Universal design and its applications in educational environments.Remedial Spec Educ 2006;27:166–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff R. Universal design across the curriculum.New Dir High Educ 2007;137:27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Last E. Accessing the Disabling Society: disabled people’s participation in the governance of access. PhD thesis. London Department of Geography, King’s College London2010.
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza N. Is universal design a critical theory? In: Keates S, Clarkson J, Langdon P, Robinson P, editors. Designing a more inclusive world. Berlin Springer-Verlog2004. pp 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Smith K. Redefining home. In: Smith K, Webb J, Williams B, editors. Just below the line: disability, housing, and equity in the South. Fayetteville, AK The University of Arkansas Press2010. pp 133–162.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias J. Universal design: is it really about design? Infor Techn Disabil 2003;9:2.
   Google Scholar
• Newell A,Gregor P. User sensitive inclusive design: in search of a new paradigm. Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability. New York ACM New York2000. pp 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden GC. Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: alternatives or complements? Assist Technol1998;10:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchererMJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life.DisabilRehabil1996;18:439–448.
   Google Scholar
• Findelli A. Rethinking design education for the 21st Century: theoretical methodological and ethical discussion. Des Issues 2001;17:5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman S. Contested knowledge: social theory today. 3rd ed. Oxford Blackwell Publishing Limited2004.
   Google Scholar
• Grayling A. The form of things: essays of life, ideas and liberty in the 21st Century. London Weidenfeld & Nicolson2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paine T. The age of reason. Boston Josiah P. Mendum1852.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson B. Can technology overcome the disabling city. In: Butler R, Parr H, editors. Mind and body spaces. LondonRoutledge1999. pp 98–118.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone A. Access to new technology in the employment of disabled people. In: Swain J, Finkelstein V, French S, Oliver M, editors. Disabling barriers, enabling environments. 2nd ed. London Sage Publications2004. pp 241–249.
   Google Scholar
• IwarssonS, StåhlA. Accessibility, usability and universal design–positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships.Disabil Rehabil2003;25:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story MF. Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design.Assist Technol1998;10:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litvak S, Enders A. The interface between individuals and environments. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. London Sage Publications2001. pp 711–733.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan J. Disability discrimination – alive and well in NYC. Ragged Edge Online 2006. Available at: http://www.raggededgemagazine.com/departments/reflections/000910.html
   Google Scholar
• Fraser N.. Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. The Tanner lectures on human values. California: Stanford University, California; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes E. The ecological aspect of institutions. Am Socio Rev 1936;1:180–189.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker L. The role of institutions in cultural persistence. Am Socio Rev 1977;42:726–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas P. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organisat 1992;46:1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grech S. Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. Int J Inclusive Educ 2011;15:87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley D, Lawthom R. Disability, community and empire: indigenous psychologies and social psychoanalytic possibilities. Int J Inclusive Educ 2011;15:101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser W. Paradigm for the 21st century: the challenging of implementing universal design. In: Vavik T, editor. Inclusive buildings, products & services: challenges in universal design. Trondheim Tapir Academic Press2009. pp 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro G. Post-imperialism: for a discussion after post-colonialism and multiculturalism. In: Mato R, editor. Estudios Latino Americanossobreculturaytransformacionessociales en tiempos de globalización. Buenos Aires CLACSO2001. pp 61–183.
   Google Scholar
• Pressenytt. Norway points the way in inclusive design. Oslo Norwegian Design Council2009. Available at: http://www.norskdesign.no/design-for-all/norway-points-the-way-in-inclusive-design-article9760-8530.html
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld E, Shea S. Fair housing: towards universal design in multi-family housing. In: Preiser W, Ostroff E, editors. Universal design handbook. New York McGraw-Hill2001. pp 35.31–35.13.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, ChatterjiS, Badley EM, UstünTB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps.Soc Sci Med1999;48:1173–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotch R, Schriner K. Disability as human variation: implications for policy. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 1997;549:148–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZolaIK. Toward the necessary universalizing of a disability policy. Milbank Q1989;67(Suppl 2,Pt 2):401–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BickenbachJE. Disability, culture and the U.N. convention. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1111–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York UN2006.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. London Routledge and Kegan Paul1962.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser N, Honneth N. Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London Verso2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg P. Is there nothing beyond postmodernism and ‘the theoretical Other’? The need for balancing universalism and diversity in social work.Int J Soc Welfare 2009;18:317–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb S. Against difference and diversity in social work: the case of human rights. Int JSoc Welfare 2009;18:307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J. Access for all? The promise and problems of universalism. Soc Work Soc 2004; 2, online journal, article available at: http://www.socwork.net/2004/2/debate/450/Clarke2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams F. Somewhere over the rainbow: universality and diversity in social policy. In: Manning N, Page R, editors. Social policy review4. Canterbury Social Policy Association1992. pp 200–219.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood V. Nature, self, and gender: feminism, environmental philosophy, and the critique of rationalism. HypatiaEcol Feminism 1991;6:3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau E. Universalism, particularism and the question of identity. In: Wilmsen E, McAllister P, editors. Ethic premises in a world of power. Chicago University of Chicago Press1996. pp 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin R. The political economy of protectionism. In: Bhagwati J, editor. Import competition and response. Chicago University of Chicago Press1982. pp 263–292.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V,Whitney P. Faster, cheaper, deeper user research. Des Manag J 2003;14:50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Salmen J. Universal design for academic facilities.New Dir Student Serv 2011;134:13–20
   Google Scholar
• Harper S. Is there design-for-all? Univers Access Inform Soc 2007;6:111–113.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau E. Emancipation. London Verso1996.
   Google Scholar