Participation-based environment accessibility assessment tool (P-BEAAT) in the Zambian context

References

• Central Statistical Office. Census data from Zambia. In: Ministry of Finance and National Planning, editor. Lusaka: Government Printers; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office. Zambia 2000 census of population and housing. In: Central Statistical Office, editor. Lusaka: Desktop Publishing Unit, CSO; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R, Hall P. Barriers to disabled people’s inclusion in the built environment. In: Inclussive design: designing and developing accessible environments. London: Spon Press; 2001. pp 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. In: Agenda item 13.9. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Meade MA, Dijkers M, Tate DG, Bushnik T, Forchheimer MB. Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1793–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark S, Morgan KA. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:434–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark S, Hollingsworth HH, Morgan KA, Gray DB. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:123–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maart S, Eide AE, Jelsma J, Loeb ME. Environmental barriers experienced by urban and rural disabled people in South Africa. Disabil Soc 2007;22:357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Lee A, Tah JHM, Aouad G. The use of a multi-attribute tool for evaluating accessibility in buildings: the AHP approach. Facilities 2007;25:375–389.
   Google Scholar
• Welage N, Liu KP. Wheelchair accessibility of public buildings: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett S, Kirby RL, Macdonald B. Wheelchair accessibility: descriptive survey of curb ramps in an urban area. Disabili RehabilAssist Technol 2009;4:17–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bromley R, Matthews D, Thomas C. City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: the consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities 2007;24:229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church R, Marston J. Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Genet Anal 2003;35:83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Fänge A, Iwarsson S, Persson A. Accessibility to the public environment as perceived by teenagers with functional limitations in a south Swedish town centre. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzat T, Dada O. Wheelchair accessibility of public buildings in Ibadan, Nigeria. Asian Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2005;16:115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Losinsky LO, Levi T, Saffey K, Jelsma J. An investigation into the physical accessibility to wheelchair bound students of an Institution of Higher Education in South Africa. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25:305–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Useh U, Moyo AM, Munyonga E. Wheelchair accessibility of public buildings in the central business district of Harare, Zimbabwe. Disabil Rehabil 2001;23:490–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. Convention on the Rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie R, Hall P. Alternative directions in property development, disability and design. In: Inclusive design: designing and developing accessible environments. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 2001. pp 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmingson H, Borell L. Environmental barriers in mainstream schools. Child Care Health Dev 2002;28:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysor J. How does the environment influence disability? Examining the evidence. In: Workshop on disability in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hendershot GE. The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S10–S14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain L, Todd C. Food store accessibility. Am J Occup Ther 1990;44:487–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ADA accessibility guidelines. ADA accessibility guidelines for buildings and facilities (ADAAG) (as ammended 2002). 42 U.S.C. 12101–12213.Washington, DC: Access Board; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Evcil AN. Wheelchair accessibility to public buildings in Istanbul. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Equality Act. Equality Act, Chapter 15. United Kindom, editor. 2010: UK. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/pdfs/ukpga_20100015_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Standard. Design for access and mobility Part 1: General requirements for access-New building work. AS 1428.1: Standards Australia, Canberra; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, Das-Pattanayak RK. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Strategic themes in qualitative inquiry. In: Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2002. pp 37–73.
   Google Scholar
• UN. Accessibility for the disabled-A design manual for a barrier free environment. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division of Social Policy and Development. UN; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Standard, 1428.1-2001: Design for access and mobility, Part 1: General requirements for access: New building work. Standards Australia, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Validity of measurements. In: Foundations of Clinical Research Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009. pp 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sprinthall RC. Tests and measurements. In: Hanson K, Pascal B, Jeffrey J, editors. Basic Statistical Analysis. Sydney: ALLYN and BACON; 2000. pp 448–485.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Statistical measures of reliability. In: Foundations of Clinical Research Applications to Practice. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009. pp 585–618.
   Google Scholar
• US Standards. USA standard specifications for making buildings and facilities accessible to, and usable by, the physically handicapped. J Am Health Care Assoc 1975;1:57–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Disability Rights Commission. A shared approach, a common understanding. Community Care for everyone in Social Care 2000 7-11–2010. Available from: http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2000/05/10/25071/Commiss.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Standard. Australian standards design for access and mobility Part 2: Enhanced and additional requirements-Buildings and facilities. Standards Australia: Homebush, NSW 2140, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office, editor. Summary report for the 2000 census of population and housing. Lusaka: Government Printers; 2003.
   Google Scholar