The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke

References

• Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:355–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B, Grimby G, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2007;16:833–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Cieza A. ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008;44:315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Pedro-Cuesta J, Alberquilla Á, Virués-Ortega J, Carmona M, Alcalde-Cabero E, Bosca G, López-Rodríguez F, et al. ICF disability measured by WHO-DAS II in three community diagnostic groups in Madrid, Spain. Gac Sanit 2011;25 Suppl 2:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algurén B, Fridlund B, Cieza A, Sunnerhagen KS, Christensson L. Factors associated with health-related quality of life after stroke: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26:266–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II. 2001. Available at: www.who.int/icidh/whodas/. Accessed on: January, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1521–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich MT, Poppendick U, Möller C, Wallesch CW. [Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2008;47:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwastiak LA, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant A, McKenna SP, Hagell P. Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value Health 2004;7 Suppl 1:S22–S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesio L, Simone A, Bernardinello M. Rehabilitation and outcome measurement: where is Rasch analysis-going? Eura Medicophys 2007;43:417–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batcho CS, Tennant A, Thonnard JL. ACTIVLIM-Stroke: a crosscultural Rasch-built scale of activity limitations in patients with stroke. Stroke 2012;43:815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher GH. Derivations of the Rasch model.. In: Fischer GH, Molenaar IW, editors. Rasch models: foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995. pp 15–38.
   Google Scholar
• Teresi JA, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures. Stat Med 2000;19:1651–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhan AH, Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A. The Rasch Measurement Model.. In: Franchignoni F, editors. Advances in Rehabilitation. Research Issues in Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine. Pavia: Maugeri Foundation; 2010. pp 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, et al.; MHADIE consortium. Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulug B, Ertugrul A, Gogus A, Kabakcı E. Yetiyitimi degerlendirme cizelgesinin (WHODAS-II) sizofreni hastalarında gecerlilik ve güvenilirligi. Turk Psikiyatr Derg 2001;12:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Elhan AH, Sonel B, Tennant A. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ, Warrington WG. Time-limit tests: estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika 1951;16:167–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Newby VA, Conner GR, Grant CP, Bunderson CV. The Rasch model and additive conjoint measurement. J Appl Meas 2009;10:348–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement. London: Sage; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Marais I, Andrich D. Formalizing dimension and response violations of local independence in the unidimensional Rasch model. J Appl Meas 2008;9:200–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:1358–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM 2030. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith EV Jr. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas 2002;3:205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA, Thissen D, et al.; PROMIS Cooperative Group. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care 2007;45:S22–S31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H, Kiely G. Item clusters and computer adaptive testing: A case for testlets. J Educ Meas 1987;24:185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Measure Trans 1994; 7:28.
   Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:149–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors of long-term participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goljar N, Burger H, Vidmar G, Marincek C, Krizaj J, Chatterji S, Raggi A, et al. Functioning and disability in stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32 Suppl 1:S50–S58.
   Google Scholar
• Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, et al.; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson CJ, Avlund K, Lund R. Social inequality in onset of mobility disability among older Danes: the mediation effect of social relations. J Aging Health 2010;22:522–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay S, Küçükdeveci AA, Elhan AH, Oztuna D, Koç N, Tennant A. Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int 2011;31:339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar