The cross-cultural equivalence of participation instruments: a systematic review

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health; ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bedell GM. Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation 2004;19:191–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care 1994;3:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technology and Disability 2002;14:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens J, I S M van Engelen E, Post MW, Beurskens AJ, Wolters PM, de Witte LP. Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch Life Habits Questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:853–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo R, Harwood R, Woo J, Yeung F, Ebrahim S. Cross-cultural validation of the London Handicap Scale in Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Manderson L, Pallant JF, Omar Z, Bennett E, Rahim RB. Impact, distress and HRQoL among Malaysian men and women with a mobility impairment. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergren A, Hagell P. Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1251–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry JW, Poortinga YH, Segall MH, Dasen PR. Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998;7:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden A, Fox-Rushby JA. A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:1289–1306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, de Jong BA, de Groot IJ. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999;13:411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, Manderson L. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual’s perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls PG, Raju MS, Das-Pattanayak RK. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, Weitzenkamp D, Whiteneck GG. A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2002;40:351–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahpour M, Jonsson H, Joghataei MT, Kottorp A. Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA): PSYChometric evaluation of the Persian version to use for persons with stroke. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:59–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Pallant JF, Manderson L, Chirawatkul S. Measuring the impact of health problems among adults with limited mobility in Thailand: further validation of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008;6:6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozato F, Tobimatsu Y, Wang CW, Iwaya T, Kumamoto K, Ushiyama T. Reliability and validity of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique for Japanese individuals with spinal cord injury. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005;205:357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VP, Visser-Meily JM, Post MW. Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:752–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Guglielmi V, Picco D. Rasch psychometric validation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire in people with Parkinson’s disease. Eura Medicophys 2007;43:451–461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kersten P, Cardol M, George S, Ward C, Sibley A, White B. Validity of the impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: a comparison between two countries. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1502–1509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund ML, Fisher AG, Lexell J, Bernspång B. Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: internal scale validity of the Swedish version for use in people with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senn D. Validity of the German version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-G) questionnaire. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Vazirinejad R, Lilley JM, Ward CD. The ‘Impact on Participation and Autonomy’: acceptability of the English version in a multiple sclerosis outpatient setting. Mult Scler 2003;9:612–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin V, Desrosiers J. [Validation of the French translation of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire (IPAQ)]. Can J Occup Ther 2010;77:159–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo RS, Kwok TC, Cheng JO, Yang H, Yuan HJ, Harwood R, Woo J. Cross-cultural validation of the London Handicap Scale and comparison of handicap perception between Chinese and UK populations. Age Ageing 2007;36:544–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmar SB, Hosli EJ, Chorus AM, van Beekum T, Vogels T, Mourad-Baars PE, Engelberts AC, et al. The development and validation of a handicap questionnaire for children with a chronic illness. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellick D, Walker N, Brooks CA, Whiteneck G. Incorporating the domain of cignitive independence into CHART. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1999;3:12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kumamoto K, Iwaya T, Tobimatsu Y, Kumano H, Sonoda K, Tozato F. Japanese version of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Sogo Rehabil 2002;30:249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Rensen C, Bandyopadhyay S, Gopal PK, Van Brakel WH. Measuring leprosy-related stigma – a pilot study to validate a toolkit of instruments. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:711–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelders R, van Brakel W, Beise K, Irwanto. Testing and validating a simplified scale to measure social participation of people with disabilities in Indonesia. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:638–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. ‘Equivalence’ and the translation and adaptation of health-related quality of life questionnaires. Qual Life Res 1997;6:237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle U. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Tulsky D, Dijkers M, Brown M, Magasi S, Gordon W, DeMark H. Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S72–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S17–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Dvorak MF. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1883–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:S22–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• King G, Law M, King S, Hurley P, Hanna S, Kertoy M, Rosenbaum P, Young N. Children’s assessment of participation and enjoyment (CAPE) and preferences for activities of children (PAC). San Antonio, TX: Hartcourt Assessmetn, Inc.; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar