Physical rehabilitation in post-conflict settings: analysis of public policy and stakeholder networks

References

• Staats TB. The rehabilitation of the amputee in the developing world: a review of the literature. Prosthet Ortho Int 1996;20:45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kephart G, Asada Y. Need-based resource allocation: different need indicators, different results? BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2010). Landmine Monitor. Canada
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. A/61/611. New York: United Nations; 2006
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. World Disability Report. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Darrah J, Magil-Evans J, Adkins R. How well are we doing? Families of adolescents or young adults with cerebral palsy share their perceptions of service delivery. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:542–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G, Palsbo SE, Beatty PW. Assessing the field of disability research 1. The organization and financing of health services for persons with disabilities. Milbank Quarterly 2002;80:261+
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutenbrunner C, Ward AB, Chamberlain MA. White book on physical and rehabilitaiton in Europe. J of Rehabil Med 2007;45:6–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hattori N, Hatano T, Kubo SI, et al. Unmet needs of patients with Parkinson's disease: interview survey of patients and caregivers. J Int Med Res 2009;37:717–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi MJ, Wu SC, Chan DC, Lee CC. Social determinants of emergency utilization associated with patterns of care. Health Policy 2009;93:137–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross. The ICRC's assistance work – aims, basis for action, main activities and professions involved. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Easterly W, Dollar D. The search for the key: aid, investment, and policies in Africa. Working Paper, World Bank, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Torres M, Anderson M. Defining difficult environments for poverty reduction: PRDE Working Paper 1. London, DFID, 2004
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Service delivery in fragile situations: key concepts, findings and lessons. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Keefer P, Khemani S. Democracy public expenditures and the poor. Development research group. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff D. Capacity development in fragile states. Working Paper 58D. Maastricht, ECDPM, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Dixon C, Blanchet K. Access to services for persons with disabilities in challenging environments. Amman Conference, Lyon, France, Handicap International, International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hills A. Towards a critique of policing and national development in Africa. J Modern Afr Stud 1996;43:271–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leather A, Ismail EA, Ali R, et al. Working together to rebuild health care in post-conflict Somaliland. Lancet 2006;368:1119–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy K. Physical therapy education and provision in Cambodia: a framework for choice of systems for development projects. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:903–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy J, Khut QY, Oum S, et al. Health system strengthening in Cambodia-A case study of health policy response to social transition. Health Policy 2009;92:107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batley R, Larbi G. Changing views of the role of the government. The changing role of the Government: the reform of public services in developing countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004:15–17
   Google Scholar
• Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Pol Plan 1994;9:353–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet K, James P. How to do (or not to do)… a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Pol Plan 2012;27:438–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977;40:35–41
   Google Scholar
• Grimble R, Wellard K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. ODA NRSP Socioeconomic Methodologies Workshop, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy Plan 2000;15:239–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimble R, Chan M. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guide making management more participatory and effective. National Resource Forum 1995;19:113–24
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 2009;323:892–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies; 1999
   Google Scholar
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2011). Landmine Monitor. Canada
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan B. The pol pot regime: race, power and genocide in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge 1975–79. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs Labour and Veteran Affairs. National Plan of Action for Persons with Disabilities, including Landmine/ERW Survivors. Phnom Penh, MoSVY, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs Labour and Veteran Affairs. Plan 2002 pour l’élaboration d’un dispositif national de rééducation physique. Phnom Penh, MoSVY, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Muni SD. Maoist insurgency in Nepal: the challenges and the response. New Delhi: Rupa & Co; 2004
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. Another country-in-waiting. The Economist (Baobab), 2011
   Google Scholar
• The Economist (2011, 15 Aug 2011). Every faction for itself. The Economist, Available from: http://www.economist.com/node/21526164 [last accessed 24 Nov 2011]
   Google Scholar
• National Planning Commission and UNICEF. A situation analysis of disability in Nepal. Katmandhu, Nepal, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Nepal Ministry of Women Children and Social Welfare. National Policy and Plan of Action on Disability. Katmandhu, Nepal, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Kriitmaa K, Testa A, Osman M, et al. HIV prevalence and characteristics of sex work among female sex workers in Hargeisa, Somaliland, Somalia. AIDS 2010;24:S61–S67. doi:10.1097/1001.aids.0000386735.0000387177.0000386732a
   Google Scholar
• Quane H. The United Nations and the evolving right to self-determination. Int Comp Law Quarterly 1998;47:537–72
   Google Scholar
• Shillinger K. Recognizing Somaliland. The RUSI J 2005;150:46–51
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson S, Abdi OA. Disability in Somaliland. Disabil Soc 2003;18:911–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor AM, Rage IA, Moonen B, Snow RW. Health service providers in Somalia: their readiness to provide malaria case-management. Malar J 2009;8:100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson AE, Baraco A, Johnson O, et al. An international, case-based, distance-learning collaboration between the UK and Somaliland using a real-time clinical education website. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16:181–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. National Health Policy - draft. Hargeissa, Republic of Somaliland, Ministry of Health, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Crozier M, Friedberg E. L’acteur et le système. Paris. France, Points, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Diani M. Networks and social movements: a research programme. In: Diani M, McAdam D, eds. Social movements and networks: relational approaches to collective action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:299–319
   Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. Centrality in social networks I. conceptual clarification. Soc Net 1979;1:215–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar