Do community-based rehabilitation programmes promote the participation of persons with disabilities? A case control study from Mandya District, in India

References

• UN, CRPD. United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/
   Google Scholar
• Oliver M. Understanding disability. From theory to practice. New York: Basingstoke; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Griffo G. Mainstreaming human rights of persons with disabilities in all policies. Proceeding of the Conference of Council of Europe; 2008 October; Strasbourg
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Disability report on India. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson M, Swartz L, Officer A. Research priorities for health of people with disabilities: an expert opinion exercise. Lancet 2009;374:1857–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR Guidelines, towards community-based inclusive development. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Finkenflugel H, Kuipers P, Thomas M. Community-based rehabilitation: opportunity and challenge. Lancet 2009;374:1803–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILO, UNESCO and WHO. CBR: a strategy for rehabilitation, equalization of opportunities, poverty reduction and social inclusion of people with disabilities. Joint position paper, Geneva; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell R. The research base of community-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mmatli TO. Translating disability-related research into evidence-based advocacy: the role of people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:14–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Community-based rehabilitation manual. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• WHO. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers P, Harknett S. Considerations in the quest for evidence in community based rehabilitation. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 1998;19:3–14
   Google Scholar
• Finkenflügel H, Cornielje H, Velema J. The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:348–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velema JP, Finkenflügel HJM, Cornielje H. Gains and losses of structured information collection in the evaluation of “rehabilitation in the community” programmes: ten lessons learnt during actual evaluations. Disabil Rehabil 2007;30:396–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenbichler G, Kerschan-Schindl K, Brockow T. The future of physical & rehabilitation medicine as a medical specialty in the era of evidence-based medicine. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:1–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich R, Caracciolo A. Analysing the cost of individual assistive technology programmes. Disabil Rehabil 2007;2:207–34
   Google Scholar
• Groah SL, Libin A, Lauderdale M, et al. Beyond the evidence-based practice paradigm to achieve best practice in rehabilitation medicine: a clinical review. Am Acad Phys Med Rehab 2009;1:941–50
   Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Sherer M, Whyte J. The challenge of evidence in disability and rehabilitation research and practice: a position paper. Austin: National Centre for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Alavi Y, Kuper H. Evaluating the impact of rehabilitation in the lives of people with disabilities and their families in low and middle income countries a review of tools. Bensheim, Germany: CBM; 2010
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Community-based rehabilitation and the health care referral services – guide for programme managers. Geneva: WHO Press; 1994
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO Press; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Development as freedom. New York: Knopf; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Trani JF, Bakhshi P, Bellanca N, et al. Disabilities through the capability approach lens: implications for public policies. ALTER -- European J Disabil Res 2011;5:143–57
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH. Use of the ICF in identifying factors that impact participation in physical activity/rehabilitation among people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1087–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The participation scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:193–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto R, Biggeri M, Griffo G. Life project, peer counselling and self-help groups as tools to expand capabilities, agency and human rights. ALTER – European J Disabil Res 2011;5:192–205
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois JL, Trani JF. Enlarging the capability paradigm to address the complexity of disability. ALTER -- European J Disabil Res 2009;3:2–28
   Google Scholar
• Mitra S. The capability approach and disability. J Disabil Pol Stud 2006;16:236–47
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M. Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard: Belknap Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Capability: reach and limits. In: Chiappero-Martinetti E, ed. Debating global society: reach and limits of the capability approach. Milan: Fondazione Giacomo Feltrinelli; 2009:140
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Inequality re-examined. New York and Cambridge: Russell Sage and Harvard University Press; 1992
   Google Scholar
• White H. Evaluating aid impact: approaches and findings. In: Lahiri S, ed. The theory and practice of foreign aid. Vol 1. New York: Elsevier; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, et al. Impact evaluation in practice. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Deepak S, Kumar J. Emancipatory research on impact of community-based rehabilitation (CBR). Disabil Rehabil. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S. Community participation in community-based rehabilitation programmes. Asia Pacific Disabil Rehabil J 2007;18:146–57
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. The causes of human variability. Eugenics Rev 1918;10:213–20
   Google Scholar
• Neyman J. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: essay on principles. Stat Sci 1993;5:465–80
   Google Scholar
• Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 1974;66:688–701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV, Duflo E. The experimental approach to development economics. Annu Rev Econ 2009;1:151–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro V. Metodi statistici per la valutazione di impatto dei programmi di aiuto. In: Biggeri M. Canitano G, eds. Temi avanzati di economia e politica della cooperazione internazionale allo sviluppo. Milano: Franco Angeli; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggeri M, Deepak S, Mauro V, et al. Report: impact of community-based rehabilitation (CBR) programs for persons with disability in Mandya district (Karnataka, India). AIFO; Health and Cooperation volume 18. Bangalore: AIFO; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Clark DA. Adaptation poverty and development. London: Palgrave McMillan; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Salomon JA, Tandon A, Murray CJL. Comparability of self-rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes. BMJ 2004;328:258–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar