Gender differences in the importance of participation associated with injured workers/persons perceived barriers to returning to work in the context of vocational rehabilitation

References

• Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81:646–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingefors K, Isacson D. Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain – a gender perspective. Eur J Pain 2004;8:435–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:704–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillefjell M. Function and work ability following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Lederer V, Rivard M, Mechakra-Tahiri S. Gender differences in personal and work-related determinants of return-to-work following long-term disability: a 5-year cohort study. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:522–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvam L, Eide AH, Vik K. Understanding experiences of participation among men and women with chronic musculoskeletal pain in vocational rehabilitation. Work: J Prev Assess Rehab 2013;45:161–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlgren C, Hammarstrom A. Back to work? Gendered experiences of rehabilitation. Scand J Public Healt 2000;28:88–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrefalk J-R. A 6-year follow-up study of 122 patients attending a multiprofessional rehabilitation programme for persistent musculoskeletal-related pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2007;30:9–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh E, McCracken LM, Eccleston C. Do men and women differ in their response to interdisciplinary chronic pain management? Pain 2005;114:37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang Y. Factors related to returning to work following a Work-Oriented Occupational Therapy Program for individuals with physical disabilities. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8:141–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote D, Coutu M-F. A critical review of gender issues in understanding prolonged disability related to musculoskeletal pain: how are they relevant to rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 2009;32:87–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen I. Coping with long-term musculoskeletal pain and its consequences: is gender a factor? Pain 1994;57:167–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlund G. Domestic strain: a hindrance in rehabilitation? Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18:49–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss M, Floderus B, Diderichsen F. How do job characteristics, family situation, domestic work, and lifestyle factors relate to sickness absence? A study based on Sweden post. J Occup Environ Med 2004;46:1134–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breivik H. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Tao W, Haley SM. Blending activity and participation sub-domains of the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1742–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1445–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vik K. Older adults' participation in occupation in the context of home-based rehabilitation. Karolinska institutet, Division of Occupational Therapy: Huddinge 2008;95:[70] s
   Google Scholar
• Borell L. Exploring experiences of participation among individuals living with chronic pain. Scand J Occup Ther 2006;13:76–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bricout JC, Gray DB. Community receptivity: The ecology of disabled persons’ participation in the physical, political and social environments. Scand J Disabil Res 2006;8:1–21
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW. Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M. Participation: the insider's perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:S34–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken LM, Yang SY. The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain 2006;123:137–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt J. Prediction of success from a multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain. Spine 1997;22:990–1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonherr MC. Vocational reintegration following spinal cord injury: expectations, participation and interventions. Spinal Cord 2004;42:177–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Health, stress, and coping. 1979, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. XIV, 255 s
   Google Scholar
• Bentsen BG, Natvig B, Winnem M. Questions you didn't ask? COOP/WONCA Charts in clinical work and research. Family Practice 1999;16:190–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S. Participation: a comparative analysis of multiple rehabilitation stakeholders' perspectives. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:936–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G-W, Shook TL, Kay GL. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:907–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 2010, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. XIV, 345 s
   Google Scholar
• Pett M, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. London: Sage; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Noon M, Blyton P. The realities of work. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W, Diekman AB. Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal, in the developmental social psychology of gender, T. Eckes and H.m. Trautner, Eds. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2000:123–74
   Google Scholar
• Cheal D. Sociology of family life. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. The body identity and self. Sociol Quart 1995;36:657–80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair KPS. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:192–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn G. Parenting: a neglected human occupation. Parents' voices not yet heard. Aust Occup Therap J 1994;41:173–6
   Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Vol. 2. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1962
   Google Scholar
• Tone Innstrand S. Gender-specific perceptions of four dimensions of the work/family interaction. J Career Assess 2009;17:402–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson EE. “How could I even think of a job?” – Ambiguities in working life in a group of female patients with undefined musculoskeletal pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997;15:169–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw SM. Dereifying family leisure: an examination of women's and men's everyday experiences and perceptions of family time. Leis Sci 1992;14:271–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg V. Pain rehabilitation in Sweden: a quality registry study. Umeå: Umeå University; 2011
   Google Scholar