Validation of the Hungarian version of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire

References

• De Souza L, Frank AO. Patients' experiences of the impact of chronic back pain on family life and work. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:310–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 1991;12:141–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ. Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:264–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath G, Koroknai G, Acs B, et al. Prevalence of low back pain and lumbar spine degenerative disorders. Questionnaire survey and clinical-radiological analysis of a representative Hungarian population. Int Orthop 2010;34:1245–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, et al. Rating scales for low back pain. Br Med Bull 2010;94:81–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:141–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanjer J, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:2143–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3115–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1899–908; discussion 1909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Binkley JM. Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2416–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne CE, Koepsell TD, Von Korff M, et al. Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:31–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne CE, Von Korff M, Koepsell TD, et al. A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:2339–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR. Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1104–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh DA, Radcliffe JC. Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Pain 2002;97:23–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, van den Ancker M, et al. The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis: results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1869–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2003–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valasek T, Varga PP, Szoverfi Z, et al. Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Eur Spine J 2013;22:1010–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulik E, Belec B, Molnar R, et al. Applicability of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization's quality of life questionnaire in Hungary. Orv Hetil 2007;148:155–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA, Group W. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feise RJ, Michael Menke J. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:78–86; discussion 87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan S, Hu Z, Hong H, Zhao F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:875–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharovsky A, Pueyrredon M, Craig D, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1391–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1099–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, et al. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1601–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JS, Lee DH, Suh KT, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Eur Spine J 2011;20:2115–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J 2002;11:126–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:241–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E454–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil Del Real MT, et al. Validation of the spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:538–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, Niyazoglu H. Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:2738–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maaroufi H, Benbouazza K, Faik A, et al. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Moroccan version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:1461–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JC, et al. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Eur Spine J 2006;15:55–65
   Google Scholar
• Menezes Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:934–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, et al. Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar