Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation

References

• Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:769–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy D, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24:783–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Social Insurance Office (Försäkringskassan). Persons on long-term sick leave. Descriptive statistics 1999–2009: gender, employment status, length of sick leave, and panorama of diagnoses. Social Insurance Report 2010:16 [In Swedish: Långtidssjukskrivna. Beskrivande statistik 1999–2009: kön, ålder, arbetsmarknadsstatus, sjukskrivningslängd, och diagnospanorama]. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Jonsson H, Tham K, Eriksson G. A comparison of perceived occupational gaps between people with stress-related ill health or musculoskeletal pain and a reference group. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:411–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson E, Lexell J, Rivano-Fischer M, Eklund M. Everyday occupational problems perceived by participants in a pain rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther 2013;20:306–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harker J, Reid K, Bekkering G, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark and Sweden. Pain Res Treat 2012;2012:371248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR). The rehabilitation warranty 2013 [In Swedish: Rehabiliteringsgarantin 2013]. Stockholm: Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis F. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil 2012;22:213–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:115–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Haas M, Maher C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-endorsed treatments for low back pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1024–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch H, Bodin L, Bergström G, Jensen I. Patterns of sickness absence a decade after pain-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Pain 2011;152:1727–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Rehabilitation for chronic pain. A literature review. [In Swedish: Rehabilitering vid långvarig smärta. En systematisk litteraturöversikt.] Stockholm: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU); 2010
   Google Scholar
• Schultz I, Stowell A, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:327–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch H, Bonnevier H, Hagberg J, et al. National evaluation of the rehabilitation warranty effects on sick-leave and health. Final report, part 1. [In Swedish: En nationell utvärdering av rehabilitaeringsgarantins effekter på sjukfrånvaro och hälsa]. Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM). Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Hägglund P, Johansson P, Laun L. The Swedish rehabilitation warranty. [In Swedish: rehabiliteringsgarantin]. Uppsala: Institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk utvärdering (IFAU) 2012:26;2012
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in Swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil 2009;19:264–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus T, Woodcock A, Vogel S. Returning back pain patients to work: how private musculoskeletal practitioners outside the national health service perceive their role (an interview study). J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:322–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshi A, Hansson J, Brommels M, et al. A process evaluation of implementation of the national rehabilitation warranty [In Swedish: En processutvärdering av implementeringen av den nationella rehabiliteringsgarantin. Slutrapport del II]. Enheten för interventions – och implementeringsforskning, Institutet för miljömedicin and Medical Management Centrum, Institutionen för lärande, information och etik. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren K, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Women on sickness absence – views of possibilities and obstacles for returning to work. A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:213–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagman P, Björklund A, Håkansson C, et al. Perceprions of life balance among a working population in Sweden. Qual Health Res 2011;21:410–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordik E, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Varekamp I, et al. Exploring the return-to-work process for workers partially returned to work and partially on long-term sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:1625–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jonsson H, Johansson U, Tham K. Connecting rehabilitation and everyday life – the lived experiences among women with stress-related ill health. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1790–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:607–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Bonnevier H, Jensen I, et al. A process evaluation of multimodal team within the frame of the rehabilitation warranty. [In Swedish: En processutvärdering av multimodala team inom ramen för rehabiliteringsgarantin.]. Unit of intervention and implementation research. Institute of environmental medicine. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2014
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousands Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:214–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen L. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:573–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadell G, Burton K. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. London: The Stationery Office; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hakanen J, Schaufeli W. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. J Affec Disord 2012;141:415–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen M, Nielsen K, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012;38:93–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briand C, Durand M, St-Arnaurd L, Corbiére M. How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions adress the multicausality of work disability? J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:207–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlson B, Jönsson P, Pålsson B, et al. Return to work after a workplace-intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout – a prospective controlled study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund M, Erlandsson L. Return to work outcomes of the Redesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) program for women with stress-related disorders – a comparative study. Women Health 2011;51:676–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelen C, Koopmans P, Anema J, van der Beck A. Recurrence of medically certified absence according to diagnosis: a sickness absence register study. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:113–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers-Sanchez P, Wind H, et al. What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011;37:481–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Social Insurance Office (Försäkringskassan). Report of “developed interaction between the National Social Insurance Office and healthcare as well as other actors in the sick leave process Report No. 005437-2012-FPS. [In Swedish: Utvecklat samspel mellan Försäkringskassan och hälso- och sjukvården samt andra aktörer I sjukskrivningsprocessen]. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Falardeau M, Baril R, et al. The values underlying team decision-making in work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:561–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Ritchie J. Generalising from qualitative research. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE; 2003
   Google Scholar