Rehabilitation of compensable workplace injuries: effective payment models for quality vocational rehabilitation outcomes in a changing social landscape

References

• Leigh JP. Economic burden of occupational injury and illness in the United States. Milbank Q 2011;89:728–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SafeWork Australia. Key work health and safety statistics. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Purse K. The evolution of workers' compensation policy in Australia. Health Sociol Rev 2005;14:8–20
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. Vocational rehabilitation framework – model options final report. Available from: www.workcover.com/documents.ashx?id=2054: Workcover SA2011 [last accessed 27 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Delbanco SF. Curing our toxic payment system. Am J Med Qual 2006;21:221–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett S. Next steps in health workforce reform. Aust Econ Rev 2006;39:318–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy S, De Boer M. Outcomes based funding (OBF) pilots: final evaluation report. New Zealand: Centre for Social Research and Evaluation – Ministry of Social Development; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Glazier MD, Klein-Geltink J, Kopp A, Sibley LM. Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation. CMAJ 2009;180:E72–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, et al. Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2001;6:44–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greβ S, Delnoij DMJ, Groenewegen PP. Managing primary care behaviour through payment systems and financial incentives. In: Saltman RB, Rico A, Boerma W, eds. Primary care in the driver's seat? Organizational reform in European primary care. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2006:184–200
   Google Scholar
• Buntin MB, Colla CH, Escarce JJ. Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care. Health Serv Res 2009;44:1188–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin EM, Deutsch A, Heinemann AW. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities: variation in organizational practice in response to prospective payment. Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:149–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame GM, Mosier J, Reisinger CW, et al. Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting. J Mental Health Admin 1995;22:226–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durham ML. Mental health and managed care. Ann Rev Public Health 1998;19:493–505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachan E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:349–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW. State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: setting the agenda and developing an evidence base for practice and public policy. An introduction. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:78–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WorkSafe Australia. Comparison of workers’ compensation arrangements in Australia and New Zealand 2012–2013. Commonwealth of Australia; 2013. Available from: http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/comparison2013 [last accessed 19 Feb 2014]
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health & Human Services. The Affordable Care Act. 2014. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/law/index.html [last accessed 19 Feb 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein R. Funding health related vocational rehabilitation services: the potential impact of The Affordable Care Act. Review VR – Policy Note [serial on the Internet]. 2013; 3. Available from: http://explorevr.org/review_vr/funding-health-related-vocational-rehabilitation-services-the-potential-impact-of-the-affordable-care-act.html [last accessed 19 Feb 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Ellis N, Mackenzie A, Mobbs R. Compensation and wellness: a conflict for veterans' health. Aust Health Rev 2008;32:308–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Clapton J. Time for a shift in Australian rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1097–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiter MP, Maslach C. A mediation model of job burnout. In: Antoniou ASG, Cooper CL, eds. Research companion to organizational health psychology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2005:544–64
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd C, King R, Chenoweth L. Social work, stress and burnout: a review. J Ment Health 2002;11:255–66
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: the need for new operational frameworks. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:898–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trief PM, Donelson RG. The potential impact of the workers' compensation system on quality of life outcomes: a clinical analysis. J Occup Rehabil 1995;5:185–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales C, Matthews LR, Donelly M. Medically unexplained chronic pain in Australia: difficulties for rehabilitation providers and workers in pain. Work 2010;36:167–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien D, Revell G. The milestone payment system: results based funding in vocational rehabilitation. J Vocat Rehabil 2005;23:101–14
   Google Scholar
• Davis K. Making payment reform possible. 2007. Available from: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/From-the-President/2007/Making-Payment-Reform-Possible.aspx [last accessed Feb 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Collins CM. Outcome-based reimbursement, consumer choice and the inclusion of all job seekers: compatibility issues for state vocational rehabilitation agencies. Vermont: University of Vermont; 2002
   Google Scholar
• WorkCover NSW. Approval framework for workplace rehabilitation providers: workplace rehabilitation provider fee structure. Gosford: WorkCover NSW; 2011
   Google Scholar
• QBE Insurance Australia Limited. QBE Connect Newsletter. Sydney: QBE Insurance Australia Limited; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Corden A, Thornton P. Results-based funded supported employment: avoiding disincentives to serving people with greatest need. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions; 2003
   Google Scholar
• QBE Insurance Australia Limited. QBE Connect Newsletter Edition 1. Sydney: QBE Insurance Australia Limited; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Finn D. Differential pricing in contracted out employment programmes: review of international evidence, research report no. 564. Norwich: Department for Work and Pensions; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin P. Managing for outcomes: milestone contracting in Oklahoma. Arlington (VA): Pricewaterhouse Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Conrad DA, Perry L. Quality-based financial incentives in health care: can we improve quality by paying for it? Ann Rev Publ Health 2009;30:357–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonet D. Patient satisfaction under managed care. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2005;18:424–40
   Google Scholar
• Baker LC, McClellan MB. Managed care, health care quality, and regulation. J Legal Stud 2001;30:715–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn R, Kant P. Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting. Publ Produc Manag Rev 1999;22:470–89
   Google Scholar
• Miller HD. Creating payment systems to accelerate value-driven health care issues and options for policy reform. Pittburgh: Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Ettner SL, Denmead G, Dilonardo J, et al. The impact of managed care on the substance abuse treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicaid beneficiaries: Maryland's healthchoice program. J Behav Health Serv Res 2003;30:41–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross P. The high performance, transparent health system: improving population health, the patient experience and chronic disease management via provider payment reform and a national concerted action plan. Sydney: Health Group Strategies Pty. Limited & The Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment (France); 2008
   Google Scholar
• Stein J. Ethical issues in inpatient rehabilitation length of stay determination. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2012;19:86–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Medical Association. An introduction to risk assessment and risk adjustment models. AMA Private Seector Advocacy unit; 2009. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/psa/risk-assessment.pdf [last accessed Feb 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Taylor L, Roigard A, Sung T, Vuletich J. The New Zealand Physiotherapy workforce: an audit of current gaps and implications for future needs. New Zeal J Physiother 2006;34:112–13
   Google Scholar
• Powell JM, Griffith SL, Kanny EM. Occupational therapy workforce needs: a model for demand-based studies. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:467–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran D, McGillis Hall L, Davis A, et al. Identification of recruitment and retention strategies for rehabilitation professionals in Ontario, Canada: results from expert panesl. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittos E, Mpofu E, Matthews LR. Rehabilitation counsellor preferences for rural work settings: results and implications of an Australian study. Aust J Rehabil Counsel 2011;17:1–14
   Google Scholar
• Chuang E, Wells R, Alexander JA. Public managed care and service access in outpatient substance abuse treatment units. SpringerLink; 2010. Available from: http://0-www.springerlink.com.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/content/c41k50278713ut3u/fulltext.pdf [last accessed 24 Dec 2010]
   Google Scholar