A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation

References

• Horton S, Howell A, Humby K, Ross A. Engagement and learning: an exploratory study of situated practice in multi-disciplinary stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:270–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte K, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:877–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medley A, Powell T. Motivational Interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehab 2010;20:481–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica A, Rapport L, Whitman R, et al. Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation therapy engagement scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2006;51:331–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright F. Does how we think about therapy matter? Voices and values in speech language therapy, in New Zealand Speech-language Therapists' Association Professional Development Seminar; 2013; Hamilton, New Zealand
   Google Scholar
• Basta T, Shacham E, Reece M. Psychological distress and engagement in HIV-related services among individuals seeking mental health care. AIDS Care 2008;20:969–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper MP, Alexander GL, Zhang N, et al. Engagement and retention: measuring breadth and depth of participant use of an online intervention. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattox M. Axial Exchange debuts Patient Engagement Index (PEI) hospital ranking; 2005. Available from: http://axialexchange.com/blog/article-exchange-debuts-patient-engagement-index-pei-ranking-hospitals-based [last accessed 24 Jun 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Axial Exchange. Patient Engagement Index Methodology 2013. Available from: http://axialexchange.com/engagement/methodology/ [last accessed 8 Oct 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Hitch D. Experiences of engagement in occupations and assertive outreach services. Br J Occup Ther 2009;72:482–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J. Exploring the theoretical basis of nursing using advanced techniques of concept analysis. Adv Nurs Sci 1995;17:31–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse J. Exploring pragmatic utility: concept analysis by critically appraising the literature. In: Ridgers B, Knafl K, eds. Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques and applications. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 2000:333–52
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers B, Knafl K, eds. Concept development in nursing: techniques and applications. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Morse J, Hupcey JE, Mitcham C, Lenz ER. Concept analysis in nursing research: a critical appraisal. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 1996;10:253–77
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weaver K, Morse J. Pragmatic utility: using analytical questions to explore the concept of ethical sensitivity. Res Theor Nurs Pract 2006;20:191–214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penrod J, Hupcey J. Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2005;50:403–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins S, Morse J. The praxis of courage as a foundation for care. J Nurs Sch 2014;46:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson BJ, Wolpert HA. A developmental perspective on the challenges of diabetes education and care during the young adult period. Patient Educ Couns 2004;53:347–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel M, Destefano C. Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment. J Offender Rehabil 2002;33:87–124
   Google Scholar
• Bright F, Kayes NM, McCann CM, McPherson KM. Understanding hope after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;18:490–508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Holmbeck G, Devine K. Editorial: an author's checklist for measure development and validation manuscripts. J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:691–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Skills Appraisal Programme. Ten questions to help you make sense of qualitative research 2010. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP_Qualitative_Appraisal_Checklist_14oct10.pdf [last accessed 19 Dec 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research: observational methods in health care settings. BMJ 1995;311:182–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook P, Stott R, Rose M, et al. Adherence to group exercise: physiotherapist-led experimental programmes. Physiotherapy 1998;84:366–72
   Google Scholar
• Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, et al. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:793–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayes NM, McPherson KM, Taylor D, et al. Facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative investigation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:625–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe R, Heath C, Burns T, Priebe S. Engagement of patients with psychosis in the consultation: conversation analytic study. Br Med J 2002;325:1148–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase M, Zinken J, Costall A, et al. These psychiatrists rate themselves as gods: disengagement and engagement discourses of people living with severe mental illness. Commun Med 2010;7:43–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priebe S, Watts J, Chase M, Matanov A. Processes of disengagement and engagement in assertive outreach patients: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:438–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury N, Munro TA. Crisis engagement in mental health: a New Zealand MĀori contribution. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2008;17:317–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie M, Smith J, Meaden A, et al. Clients' engagement with assertive outreach services: a comparison of client and staff perceptions of engagement and its impact on later engagement. J Ment Health 2004;13:439–52
   Google Scholar
• Park M, Tyrer P, Elsworth E, et al. The measurement of engagement in the homeless mentally ill: the Homeless Engagement and Acceptance Scale – HEAS. Psychol Med 2002;32:855–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall M, Meaden A, Smith J, Jones C. Brief report: the development and psychometric properties of an observer-rated measure of engagement with mental health services. J Ment Health 2001;10:457–65
   Google Scholar
• Meaden A, Hacker D, de Villiers A, et al. Developing a measurement of engagement: The Residential Rehabilitation Engagement Scale for Psychosis. J Ment Health 2012;21:183–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Rapport LJ, Whitman RD, et al. Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation therapy engagement scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psychol 2006;51:331–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemppainen JK, O'Brien L, Williams H, et al. Quantifying patient engagement with nurses: validation of a scale with AIDS patients. Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract 1999;3:167–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macgowan M. The group engagement measure: a review of its conceptual and empirical properties. J Groups Addict Recover 2006;1:33–52
   Google Scholar
• McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien A, White S, Fahmy R, Singh SP. The development and validation of the SOLES, a new scale measuring engagement with mental health services in people with psychosis. J Ment Health 2009;18:510–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Kovarsky D. Engagement in clinical interaction: an introduction. Semin Speech Lang 2009;30:5–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danzl MM, Etter NM, Andreatta RD, Kitzman PH. Facilitating neurorehabilitation through principles of engagement. J Allied Health 2012;41:35–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallinson RK, Rajabiun S, Coleman S. The provider role in client engagement in HIV care. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2007;21:S-77–84
   Google Scholar
• Addis J, Gamble C. Assertive outreach nurses' experience of engagement. J Psych Ment Health Nurs 2004;11:452–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chase M, Malden A, Lansbury L, et al. In sight, out of mind: the experiences of the compliantly engaged community psychiatric out-patient. Community Ment Health J 2012;48:574–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchan J. Engagement: a concept and some possible uses. Semin Speech Lang 2009;31:11–17
   Google Scholar
• Watkins KE, Shaner A, Sullivan G. The role of gender in engaging the dually diagnosed in treatment. Community Ment Health J 1999;35:115–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright N, Callaghan P, Bartlett P. Mental health service users' and practitioners' experiences of engagement in assertive outreach: a qualitative study. J Psych Ment Health Nurs 2011;18:822–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt M, Lodato G, Hickman C. Therapists talk about the engagement process. Commun Ment Health J 2012;48:212–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad SC. Loss in translation: a model for therapeutic engagement and intervention with grieving clients. Fam Soc 2009;90:407–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett DK, Henwood B, Abrams C, Davis A. Engagement and retention in services among formerly homeless adults with co-occurring mental illness and substance abuse: voices from the margins. Psychiatr Rehabil J 2008;31:226–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolhouse S, Brown J, Thind A. Meeting people where they're at: experiences of family physicians engaging women who use illicit drugs. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:244–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbie SA, Conley VM, Burman ME. Advanced practice nursing model for comprehensive care with chronic illness: model for promoting process engagement. Adv Nurs Sci 2004;27:70–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godlaski TM, Butler L, Heron M, et al. A qualitative exploration of engagement among rural women entering substance user treatment. Subst Use Misuse 2009;44:62–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P. A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. J Ment Health 2002;11:191–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zubialde JP, Eubank D, Fink LD. Cultivating engaged patients: a lesson from adult learning. Families Systems Health 2007;25:355–66
   Google Scholar
• Roy V, Gourde MA, Couto E. Engagement of men in group treatment programs: a review of the literature. Groupwork 2011;21:28–45
   Google Scholar
• Lequerica A, Kortte K. Therapeutic engagement: a proposed model of engagement in medical rehabilitation Am J Phys Med Rehab 2010;89:415–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayes N, Mudge S, Bright F, McPherson K. Whose behaviour matters? Rethinking practitioner behaviour and its influence on rehabilitation outcomes. In: McPherson K, Gibson B, LePlege A, eds. Rethinking rehabilitation, in press
   Google Scholar
• Frankel R, Quill T. Integrating biopsychosocial and relationship-centered care into mainstream medical practice: a challenge that continues to produce positive results. Families Systems Health 2005;23:413–21
   Google Scholar
• Cott C. Client-centred rehabilitation: what is it and how do we do it? Physiotherapy 2008;94:89–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hal L, Meershoek A, Nijhuis F, Horstman K. A sociological perspective on “the unmotivated client”: public accountability and professional work methods in vocational rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2012;35:809–919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koekkoek B, van Meijel B, Tiemens B, et al. What makes community psychiatric nurses label non-psychotic chronic patients as ‘difficult’: patient, professional, treatment and social variables. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2011;46:1045–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill T. How clinicians make (or avoid) moral judgements of patients: implications of the evidence for relationships and research. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2010;5:11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:495–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong M, Christenson S. Engaging students at school and with learning: a relevant construct for all students. Psychol Schools 2008;45:365–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta R, Hamre B, Allen J. Teacher-student relationships and engagement: conceptualizing, measuring and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In: Christencon S, Reschley A, Wylie C, eds. Handbook of research on student engagement. New York (NY): Springer; 2012:365–86
   Google Scholar
• Eyles C, Leydon G, Brien S. Forming connections in the homeopathic consultation. Patient Educ Couns 2012;89:501–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer L, Steinmiller E, Simms S, et al. Staff engagement during complex pediatric medical care: the role of patient, family and treatment variables. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:77–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O'Brien MA. Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Educ Couns 2006;64:262–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts K. Exploring participation: older people on discharge from hospital. J Adv Nurs 2002;40:413–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne R, Weinman J, Barber N, et al. Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking. London: NCCSDO; 2005:40–6
   Google Scholar
• Thompson A. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy. Soc Sci Med 2007;1297:1297–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill J. Patient participation – a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 1998;7:119–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeb V, Burge E. Perceptions of patients and physiotherapists on patient participation: a narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiother Res Int 2011;17:80–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar