French-Canadian translation of the WheelCon-M (WheelCon-M-F) and evaluation of its validity evidence using telephone administration

References

• World Health Organization. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: WHO Press; 2008
   Google Scholar
• LaPlante MP, Kaye HS. Demographic trends in wheeled mobility equipment use and accessibility in the community. Assist Technol 2010;22:2–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields M. Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. Health Reports 2004;15:37–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Population projections for Canada, provinces and territories, 2005 to 2031. Catalogue no 91-520-XIE. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2005. Available from: http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/91-520-XIE/0010591-520-XIE.pdf [last accessed 15 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. French and the francophonie in Canada. Language, 2011 Census of Population. Catalogue no 98-314-X2011003. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2012. Available from: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-314-x/98-314-x2011003_1-eng.pdf [last accessed 15 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Canada’s rural population since 1851. Population and dwelling counts, 2011 Census. Catalogue no 98-310-X2011003. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2012. Available from: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-310-x/98-310-x2011003_2-eng.pdf [last accessed 15 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Participation and Activity Limitation Survey 2006. Catalogue no 89-628-XIE – No. 003. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2007. Available from: http://www4.hrsdc.gc.ca/[email protected]?iid=40 [last accessed 15 Jun 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook A, Green M, Krosnick J. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opin Q 2003;67:79–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Miller WC, Kirby RL, et al. Development and content validation of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: a mixed-methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:57–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rushton PW, Miller WC, Kirby RL, Eng JJ. Measuring confidence with manual wheelchair use: reliability and validity of the WheelCon. J Rehabil Med 2013;45:61–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Eng JJ, et al. Preliminary examination of the relation between participation and confidence in older manual wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:791–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Routhier F, et al. Association between self-efficacy and participation in community-dwelling manual wheelchair users aged 50 years or older. Phys Ther 2014;94:664–74
   Google Scholar
• Sakakibara BM, Miller WC, Souza M, et al. Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:1031–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Sakakibara BM, Rushton PW. The prevalence of low confidence with using a wheelchair and its relationship to wheelchair skills. Gerontologist 2012;52(S1):205. doi:10.1093/geront/gns198
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Swaine B. Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006;43:65–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005;8:94–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneger TV, Leplège A, Etter Jean-François. Cross-cultural adaptation of a psychometric instrument: two methods compared. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1037–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukri MM, Asyali MH, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res 2004;13:251–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz N, Sudman S, eds. Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco (CA): Josey-Bass; 1996
   Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. J Appl Soc Psychol 1983;13:99–125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, et al. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:429–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolbier CL, Steinhardt MA. The development and validation of the Sense of Support Scale. Beh Med 2000;25:169–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac MAM, Xingshan C, Mcalpine J, Badley EM. Measures of disability. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:S308–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakibara BM, Routhier F, Lavoie M-P, Miller WC. Reliability and validity of the French-Canadian version of the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI-F) in older, community-living wheelchair-users. Scand J Occup Ther 2013;20:365–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler F, Cannell C. Using behavioural coding to identify cognitive problems with survey questions. In: Schwarz N, Sudman S, eds. Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: Josey-Bass; 1996:15–36
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall Inc.; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, Roebroeck ME, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res 2001;10:571–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:S15–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox S, Sharpe PA, Hutto B, Granner ML. Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for exercise questionnaire in a diverse sample of men and women. J Phys Act Health 2005;2:285–97
   Google Scholar
• Myers AM, Paradis JA, Blanchard RA. Conceptualizing and measuring confidence in older drivers: development of the day and night driving comfort scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:630–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe AB. Balance confidence among people with lower-limb amputations. Phys Ther 2002;82:856–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WC, Deathe AB. A prospective study examining balance confidence among individuals with lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:875–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol 1995;50:M28–34
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1994
   Google Scholar