Responsiveness and minimally important differences for selected Persian-version of outcome measures used in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

References

• Jensen R, Gothesen O, Liseth K, Baerheim A. Acupuncture treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Altern Complement Med 1999;5:521–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, McConnell J. A systematic review of physical interventions for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2001;11:103–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:102–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand LI, Anderson B, Lygren H, et al. Responsiveness to change of 10 physical tests used for patients with back pain. Phys Ther 2011;91:404–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996;76:1109–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 1993;9:159–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther 1999;79:371–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesworth B, Culham E, Tata G, Peat M. Validation of outcome measures in patients with patellofemoral syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1989;10:302
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Houser JL, et al. Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2012;12:921–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma C, Wu S, Xiao L, Xue Y. Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2011;20:475–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Yazdi MJS, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:2259–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban H, Hessam M, Tabatabaei S, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) in a heterogeneous sample of outpatients with lower limb musculoskeletal disorders. Disabil Rehabil 2014 36:10–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Sohani SM, et al. Validation of the Persian version of Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ) and Modified FIQ in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Physiother Theory Pract 2013;29:521–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houweling TA. Reporting improvement from patient-reported outcome measures: a review. Clin Chiropractic 2010;13:15–22
   Google Scholar
• Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine 2004;29:879–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of chronic diseases 1985;38:27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• García de Yébenes Prous MJ, Salvanés FR, Ortells LC. Responsiveness of outcome measures. Reumatol Clín (English Ed) 2008;4:240–7
   Google Scholar
• Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1567–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman LA, Velozo CA. Ability to detect change in patient function: responsiveness designs and methods of calculation. J Hand Ther 2010;23:361–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, et al. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garratt A, Brealey S, Gillespie W. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology 2004;43:1414–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcock GK, Stratford PW. Validation of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale on athletic subjects with ankle sprains. Physiotherapy (Canada) 2002;54:233–40
   Google Scholar
• Watson CJ, Propps M, Ratner J, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005;35:136–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manipulative Ther 2009;17:163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Bezemer PD, Beurskens AJ. Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:479–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, et al. A comparison of the ability of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther 2010;23:31–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CW, Moseley AM, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC. The lower extremity functional scale has good clinimetric properties in people with ankle fracture. Phys Ther 2009;89:580–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:869–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacchio A, De Blasis E, Necozione S, et al. The Italian version of the lower extremity functional scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. J Clin Epidemiol 2010 May;63:550–7
   Google Scholar
• Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:815–22
   Google Scholar