Self-management: challenges for allied healthcare professionals in stroke rehabilitation – a focus group study

References

• Jones F. Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: how can we apply this to stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:841–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A, Norris M. Self-management after stroke: time for some more questions? Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:257–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennisnetwerk CVA Nederland. Zorgstandaard CVA/TIA. Maastricht: Kennisnetwerk CVA Nederland; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson A, Whitehead L. Evolution of the concept of self-care and implications for nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:1143–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Jedeloo S, Leenders J. Zelfmanagement. Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Holman H, Sobel D, et al. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions. Boulder: James Bull; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Satink T, Cup EH, Ilott I, et al. Patients' views on the impact of stroke on their roles and self: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:1171–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman-Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, et al. Processes of self-management in chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh 2012;44:136–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011;342:d1745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joyce S. Self-management following stroke. Nurs Stand 2012;26:39–46
   Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Grol R. Factoren van invloed op implementatie van veranderingen. In: Grol R, Wensing M, eds. Implementatie – effectieve verandering in de patiëntenzorg. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2001:153–71
   Google Scholar
• Hulscher M, Grol R, Wensing M. Theorieën over implementatie. In: Grol R, Wensing M, eds. Implementatie – effectieve verandering in de patiëntenzorg. Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg; 2001:39–65
   Google Scholar
• Gabbay J, Le May A. Practice-based evidence for healthcare – clinical mindlines. London: Routledge; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med 1990;65:611–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Boshuizen HP, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007;41:1178–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Human Decision Process 1991;50:179–211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Silva D. Evidence: helping people help themselves. London: Health Foundation; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Livingstone E, Hawkes L. ‘Getting the balance between encouragement and taking over’ – reflections on using a new stroke self-management programme. Physiother Res Int 2013;18:91–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norris M, Kilbride C. From dictatorship to a reluctant democracy: stroke therapists talking about self-management. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:32–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satink T, Cup EH, De Swart BJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. How is self-management perceived by community living people after a stroke? A focus group study. Disabil Rehabil 2014:1–8 . [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• DePoy E, Gitlin LN. Introduction to research – understanding and applying multiple strategies. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Freeman T. ‘Best practice’ in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs 2006;56:491–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters M. Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? J Nurs Educ 2000;39:166–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers J. Het ontwerpen van een focusgroep.In: Evers J, ed. Kwalitatief interviewen: kunst en kunde, Den Haag: Lemma; 2007:97–114
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups – a practical guide for applied research. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Devers KJ. How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1153–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen CK, Blue T. Cognitive disabilities model: how to make clinical judgements. In: Katz N, ed. Cognition occupation in rehabilitation: cognitive models for intervention and occupational therapy. Bethesda: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1998:225–79
   Google Scholar
• Sevat RG, Heesbeen IE, eds. Nazorg: Ervaringen vanuit een praktijkgerichte behandeling. Volume aflevering 13, B9.3.7. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2000:111–24
   Google Scholar
• Heesbeen IME, Sevat RG. Handleiding BEBA: Birkhovense Evaluatieschaal Behandeldoelen. Amersfoort: Verpleeg- en reactiveringscentrum Birkhoven; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, McPherson KM. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns 2011;85:206–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther 1990;57:82–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Davis JA, et al. ‘There's a real plan here, and I am responsible for that plan’: participant experiences with a novel cognitive-based treatment approach for adults living with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:540–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004;329:1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell K. Perspectives on disability & rehabilitation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unravelling the mystery of health. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Townsend EA, Polatajko H. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Battersby M, Von Korff M, Schaefer J, et al. Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36:561–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar