Psychometric properties of the Five-Digit Test in patients with stroke

References

• Hyndman D, Ashburn A. People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance, ADL ability and falls. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:817–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowd JM, Filion DL, Pohl PS, et al. Attentional abilities and functional outcomes following stroke. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2003;58:45–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1987;9:117–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedo MA. Test de los cinco dígitos [Five digit test]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sharrack B, Hughes RA, Soudain S, Dunn G. The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1999;122:141–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdejo-García A, Pérez-Expósito M, Schmidt-Río-Valle J, et al. Selective alterations within executive functions in adolescents with excess weight. Obesity 2010;18:1572–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Supervía A, Aranda D, Márquez MA, et al. Predicting length of hospitalisation of elderly patients, using the Barthel Index. Age Ageing 2008;37:339–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2002;73:188–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001;100:526–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaim C, Pérennou DA, Villy J, et al. Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS). Stroke 1999;30:1862–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke 2002;33:1022–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989;41:304–11
   Google Scholar
• Daley K, Mayo N, Danys I, et al. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): refining and validating the content. Physiother Can 1997;49:269–78
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Mayo NE, Higgins J, et al. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2003;83:617–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Hsieh CL, Dai MH, et al. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) instrument. J Rehabil Med 2002;34:20–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:737–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973;23:658--64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace J, Nadler JD, White DA, et al. Folstein vs modified Mini-Mental State Examination in geriatric stroke: stability, validity, and screening utility. Arch Neurol 1995;52:477–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen AR. The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Pers Individ Dif 1992;13:869–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhel J. Should we take the shape of reaction time distributions into account when studying the relationship between RT and psychometric intelligence? Pers Individ Dif 1993;15:357–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan Y. Biostatistics 101: data presentation. Singapore Med J 2003;44:280–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 2003;13:181–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:315–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. The new psychometrics: science, psychology and measurement. Florence (KY): Routledge; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, Lawes C, et al. Natural history of attention deficits and their influence on functional recovery from acute stages to 6 months after stroke. Neuroepidemiology 2009;35:255–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman D, Pickering RM, Ashburn A. The influence of attention deficits on functional recovery post stroke during the first 12 months after discharge from hospital. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2008;79:656–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff N. Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychol Bull 1993;114:494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer HC, Kupfer DJ. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Biol Psychiatr 2006;59:990–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zandt T. How to fit a response time distribution. Psychon Bull Rev 2000;7:424–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar