What are the functional outcomes of right hemisphere stroke patients with or without hemi-inattention complications? A critical narrative review and suggestions for further research

References

• Stone SP, Patel P, Greenwood RJ. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. Age Ageing 1993;22:46–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis CT. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke 1999;30:1196–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer P, Morris ME, Dunai J. Assessment of unilateral neglect. Phys Ther 2003;83:732–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh-Curry V, Husain M. Hemispatial neglect: approaches to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:675–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnath H, Rorden C. The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2012;50:1010–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark VW. Acute versus chronic functional aspects of unilateral spatial neglect. Front Biosci 2003;8:172–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton A, Malhotra P, Husain M. Hemispatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 2004;75:13–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelros P, Karlssonb GM, Hennerdal S. Anosognosia versus unilateral neglect. Coexistence and their relations to age, stroke severity, lesion site and cognition. Eur J Neurol 2007;14:54–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte K, Hillis AE. Recent advances in the understanding of neglect and anosognosia following right hemisphere stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2009;9:459–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, et al. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:379–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Ferraro MK, Veramonti T, et al. Hemispatial neglect: subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology 2004;62:749–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillen R, Howard Tennen H, Tara McKee T. Unilateral spatial neglect: relation to rehabilitation outcomes in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:763–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen PM, Jørgensen HS, Hirofumi N, et al. Hemineglect in acute stroke – incidence and prognostic implications: the Copenhagen Stroke Study1. Am J Phy Med Rehab 1997;76:122–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney L, Halper AS, Kwasnica CM, et al. Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: relationship with unilateral neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:322–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L, Perez I, Gupta S, et al. The Influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1997;28:1386–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, et al. The role of unilateral spatial neglect in rehabilitation of right brain–damaged ischemic stroke patients: a matched comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:743–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer T, Van de Port I, Schepers V, et al. Predicting functional outcome after stroke: the influence of neglect on basic activities in daily living. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer P, Morris ME, Hurworth RE, et al. Characterisation of unilateral neglect by physiotherapists. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:571–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett AM, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for neglect and related disorders: moving from bench to bedside in stroke patients. J Cogn Neurosci 2006;18:1223–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon-Nair A, Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Assessment of unilateral spatial neglect post stroke in Canadian acute care hospitals: are we neglecting neglect? Clin Rehabil 2006;20:623–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Kettunen JE. Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke – a review of methodological issues and recent research findings. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2006;24:209–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Bowen A. The need for randomised treatment studies in neglect research. Restor Neurol Neuros 2006;24:401–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Task force on systematic reviews and guidelines the value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88:423–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, McCulloch M, Gorman J, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med J India 2004;17:86–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson A, Moir L, Millsteed J. Impact of assistive technology on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012;7:345–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Vist GE. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Guariglia C, et al. Facilitatory effect of neglect rehabilitation on the recovery of left hemiplegic stroke patients: a cross-over study. J Neurol 1996;243:308–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, et al. Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the Functional Independence Measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:630–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell K, Wollack J, Flynn M. Functional outcomes in patients with right hemisphere brain damage. Aphasiology 2005;19:807–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Monaco M, Schintu S, Dotta M, et al. Severity of unilateral spatial neglect Is an independent predictor of functional outcome after acute inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with right hemispheric stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92:1250–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein MS, Maskill D, Marston L. Impact of visual-spatial neglect of stroke functional outcomes, discharge destination and maintenance of improvement post-discharge. BJOT 2009;72:219–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timbeck R, Spaulding SJ, Klinger L, et al. The effect of visuospatial neglect on functional outcome and discharge destination: an exploratory study. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2013;31:37–46
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965;14:61–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, et al. Functional Assessment Scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:133–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman KM, Valenstein E, Watson RT. The neglect syndrome. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW, Klawans HL, eds. Handbook of clinical neurology 45. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1985:152–83
   Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N. Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post stroke: working your way through the Maze of Assessment Choices. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004;11:41–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan PW. Behavioural inattention test, manual. Titchfield, Hampshire: Thames Valley Test Company; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Goedert K, Boston R, Barrett A. Advancing the science of spatial neglect rehabilitation: an improved statistical approach with mixed linear modelling. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli G. To explain or to predict? Stat Sci 2010;25:289–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen C, Wade DT, Robb DT, et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Mobility Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snijders AB, Bosker RJ. Standard errors and sample sizes for two-level research. J Educ Stat 1993;18:237–59
   Google Scholar
• Walker J, Almond P. Interpreting statistical findings: a guide for health professionals and students. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Halligan P, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet 1989;ii:908–11
   Google Scholar
• Lopes M, Ferreira HP, Carvalho JC, et al. Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007;65:1192–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, et al. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy 2002;73:160–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Activity. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:315–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell I. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke 2011;42:1146–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geshwinder H, Rettkeb H, Van den Heuvelc W, et al. Rehabilitation in acute stroke patients in German-speaking Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2007;137:205–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster C, Butler J, Andrews D, et al. Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial. Trials 2012;13:11 (1–19)
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Edwards LJ, Maldonado-Molina MM, et al. Real longitudinal data analysis for real people: building a good enough mixed model. Statist Med 2010;29:504–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders AB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publishers; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 2011;134:1264–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke 2013;8:25–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol 2013;591:17–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilling K, Sterne J, Wolfe C. Multilevel growth curve models with covariate effects: application to recovery after stroke. Statist Med 2001;20:685–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royston P, Moons K, Altman DG, et al. Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 2009;338:1373–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2348–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelros P, Gunnel M, Karlsson A, et al. Prognosis for patients with neglect and anosognosia special reference to cognitive impairment. J Rehabil Med 2003;35:254–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Hennerdal S. Anosognosia versus unilateral neglect. Coexistence and their relations to age, stroke severity, lesion site and cognition. Eur J Neurol 2007;14:54–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twisk JW. Applied multilevel analysis: a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checklists/c18f8
   Google Scholar
• Punt TD, Riddoch MJ. Motor neglect: implications for movement and rehabilitation following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:857–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampanis DS, Riddoch J. Motor neglect and future directions for research. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:1–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar