A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)

References

• Higginbotham DJ, Shane H, Russell S, Caves K. Access to AAC: past, present and future. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:243–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathouwers K, de Moor J, Didden R. Access to and use of Internet by adolescents who have a physical disability: a comparative study. Res Dev Disabil 2009;30:702–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris J. Including all children: finding out about the experiences of children with communication and/or cognitive impairments. Child Soc 2003;17:337–48
   Google Scholar
• Rabiee P, Sloper P, Beresford B. Doing research with children and young people who do not use speech for communication. Child Soc 2005;19:385–96
   Google Scholar
• Wickenden M. Talking to teenagers: using anthropological methods to explore identity and lifeworlds of young people who use AAC. Commun Dis Quart 2009;32:151–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggis, A. Deafening silences: researching with inarticulate children. Disabil Stud Quart 2011;31:13
   Google Scholar
• Grace E, Raghavendra P, Newman L, et al. Learning to use the Internet and online social media: what is the effectiveness of home-based intervention with youth with complex communication needs? Child Lang Teach Ther 2014;30:141–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Wood D, Newman L, Lawry J. “Why aren’t you on Facebook?”: patterns and experiences of using the Internet among young people with physical disabilities. Technol Disabil 2012;24:149–62
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Newman L, Grace E, Woods D. ‘I could never do that before’: effectiveness of a tailored Internet support intervention to increase the social participation of youth with disabilities. Child Care Health Dev 2013;39:552–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia TP, Loureiro JP, Gonzalez BG, et al. The use of computers and augmentative and alternative communication devices by children and young with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol 2011;23:135–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen K, Light J. Use of electronic communication to develop mentor–protégé relationships between adolescent and adult AAC users: pilot study. Augment Altern Commun 2000;16:227–38
   Google Scholar
• Dattilo J, Estrella G, Estrella LJ, et al. “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:16–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensperger T, Krezman C, McNaughton D, et al. “When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off of a cliff”: the challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies described by adults who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:165–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasoff LM, McNaughton D, Wolf PS, Light J. Communication demands of university settings for students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). J Postsec Educ Disabil 1998;13:31--47
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenager’s use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc 2008;10:393–411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller A, O’Mara DA. Aided communication and the development of personal story telling. In: von Tetzchner S, Grove N, eds. Augmentative and alternative communication: developmental issues. London: Whurr Publishers; 2003:256–71
   Google Scholar
• Todman J, Alm N, Higginbotham J, File P. Whole utterance approaches in AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:235–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Wilkinson R. Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: understanding initiated SGD-mediated turns. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Wilkinson R. Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augment Altern Commun 2008;24:3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch S. Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: a conversation analysis study. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33:261–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove N, Tucker S. Narratives in manual sign by children with intellectual impairments. In: von Tetzchner S, Grove N, eds. Augmentative and alternative communication: developmental issues. London: Whurr Publishers; 2003:229–55
   Google Scholar
• Waller A. Communication access to conversational narrative. Top Lang Disord 2006;26:221–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens S. Have you seen my new mobile phone? Merging AAC with mobile telephony. Commun Matt 2011;25:5–7
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt GW. The iPad: a cool communicator on the go. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2011;20:24–7
   Google Scholar
• Smith MM. Reading abilities of nonspeaking students: two case studies. Augment Altern Commun 1992;8:57–66
   Google Scholar
• Browning N. Literacy of children with physical disabilities: a literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2002;69:176–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturm J, Clendon S. Augmentative and alternative communication, language and literacy: fostering the relationship. Top Lang Disord 2004;24:76–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist A, Ronnberg J. A qualitative analysis of email interactions of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2010;26:255–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallor S. Flourishing on Facebook: virtue friendship and new social media. Ethics Inform Technol 2011;14:185–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone S, Helsper E. Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media Soc 2007;9:671–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt L. Embodied social capital and geographical perspectives: performing the habitus. Prog Hum Geogr 2008;32:227–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt L. Young peoples’ embodied social capital and performing disability. Child Geogr 2010;8:25–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela S, Park N, Kee KF. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. J Comput Mediat Commun 2009;14:875–901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. On and off the ‘net: scales for social capital in an online era. J Comput Mediat Commun 2006;11:593--628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of the online network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 2007;12:1143–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan SJ, Morrison M. Coming of age with the Internet. New Media Soc 2006;8:73–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesch G, Talmud I. Wired youth: the social world of adolescence in the information age. London: Routledge; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone S, Haddon L, Gorzig A, Olafsson K. Final report, EU kids online II. The London school of economics and political science; 2011. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20(2009-11)/EUKidsOnlineIIReports/Final%20report.pdf [last accessed 12 July 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Watson N. Well, I know this is going to sound very strange to you, but I don’t see myself as a disabled person: identity and disability. Disabil Soc 2002;17:509–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom S. Offline social ties and online use of computers: a study of disabled youth and their use of ICT advances. New Media Soc 2009;11:709–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C. Children with cerebral palsy participate: a review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30:1867–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier J, Dickinson HO, Beckung E, et al. Participation in life situations of 8–12 year old children with cerebral palsy: cross sectional European study. BMJ 2009;338:1116--21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Olsson C, Sampson J, et al. School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augment Altern Commun 2012;28:33–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang LJ, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, et al. Determinants of social participation – with friends and others who are not family members – for youths with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2010;90:1743–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang LJ, Palisano RJ, King GA, Chiarello LA. A multidimensional model of optimal participation of children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:1735–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz B, Campbell F, von Tetzchner S, et al. Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: the views of children and parents. Augment Altern Commun 2014;30:237–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Bryen DN. AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:217–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MM. The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augment Altern Commun 2005;21:67–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D, Krezman C, et al. The AAC Mentor Project: web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:56–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnfather A, Stewart M, Magill-Evans J, et al. Computer-mediated support for adolescents with Cerebral Palsy or Spina Bifida. Comput Inform Nurs 2011;29:24–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour W, Lupton D. Holding the line online: exploring wired relationships for people with disabilities. Disabil Soc 2004;19:291–305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk S. Transitions in the lives of young people with complex healthcare needs. Child Care Health Dev 2008;34:567–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAC-RERC. Mobile devices and communication Apps: an AAC-RERC white paper. Baltimore, MD; 2011. Available from: http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index.php/pages/show/id/46 [last accessed 29 Jul 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Rummel-Hudson R. A revolution at their fingertips. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2011;20:19–23
   Google Scholar
• Shane HC, Blackstone S, Vanderheiden G, et al. Using AAC technology to access the world. Assist Technol 2012;24:3–13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham J, Jacobs S. The future of the Android operating system for augmentative and alternative communication. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2011;20:52–6
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F, McNaughton D, Caves K, et al. Enhancing AAC connections with the world. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:258–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Bornman J, Granlund M, Bjorck-Akesson, E. The world health organization’s international classification of functioning, disability and health: implications for clinical and research practice in the field of augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:349–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidstrom H. ICT and participation in school and outside school activities for children and youths with physical disabilities [dissertation]. Sweden: Karolinska Institutet; 2011
   Google Scholar
• AAC-RERC. The 2012 state of the science conference in AAC: AAC-RERC final report. Baltimore (MD): AAC-RERC; 2012. Available from: http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/documents/2012_SOSC_in_AAC_Final_Report.pdf [last accessed 12 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage; 1994:105–18
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In: Holstein J, Gubrium J, eds. Handbook of constructionist research. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. Shifting the grounds. In: Morse J, Noerager P, Stern J, et al., eds. Developing grounded theory: the second generation. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S, Basil C. Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2011;27:141–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynan A. Listening to adolescents who use AAC: topics around social participation. Communication Matters National Conference; 2011 Sep 25–27; Leicester. Edinburgh: Communication Matters; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Hynan A. “ How I use the Internet and online social media”: experiences of young people who use AAC. 15th Biennial Conference of the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication; 2012 Jul 28–Aug 4; Pittsburgh. Toronto: ISAAC; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hynan A. How I use the Internet and online social media: experiences of young people who use AAC. Communication Matters National Conference; 2012, Sep 15–17; Leicester. Edinburgh: Communication Matters; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Hynan A. “How I use the Internet and online social media”: findings from a pilot investigation with an AAC user. Commun Matters 2011;25:29–32
   Google Scholar
• Hynan A. How I use the Internet and online social media: experiences of young people who use AAC. Commun Matters 2013;27:10–12
   Google Scholar
• Hulme M. Life support: young people’s needs in the digital age. London: YouthNet; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Helseth S, Misvaer N. Adolescents’ perceptions of quality of life: what it is and what matters. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:1454–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellcessor E. Access ability: policies, practices, and representations of disability online [dissertation]. University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Chapple D. The evolution of augmentative communication and the importance of alternate access. Perspect Augment Altern Commun 2011;20:34–7
   Google Scholar
• Naslund R, Gardelli A. ‘I know, I can, I will try’: youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disabil Soc 2013;28:28–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale J, Draffan EA, Wald M. Digital agility and digital decision-making: conceptualising digital inclusion in the context of disabled learners in higher education. Stud High Educ 2010;35:445–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell AF. Commentary on “Computers and people with disabilities”: accessible computing – past trends and future suggestions. ACM Transact Accessib Comput 2008;1:9.1–7
   Google Scholar
• Chantry J, Dunsford C. How do computer assistive technologies enhance participation in childhood occupations for children with multiple and complex disabilities? A review of the current literature. Brit J Occup Ther 2010;73:351–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald SJ, Clayton J. Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disabil Soc 2012;28:702–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager S, Beukelman DR, Fried-Oken M, et al. Access interface strategies. Assist Technol 2012;24:25–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollier S. Sociability and social media for people with a disability. Report for Media Access Australia; 2012. Available from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/147567201/2012-Hollier-Access-Report-on-Social-Media-Australia [last accessed 2 Feb 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Hall L, Wreford S. National survey of care workers. Final report. TNS UK Ltd [online pdf]; 2012. Available from: http://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/publications/national_publications_archive.aspx [last accessed 15 Aug 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Clayton J, Macdonald SJ. The limits of technology. Inform Commun Soc 2013;16:945--66
   Google Scholar
• Smith MM. Literacy and augmentative and alternative communication. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P, Grace E, Newman L, et al. ‘They think I’m really cool and nice’ The impact of Internet support on the social networks and loneliness of young people with disabilities. Telecommun J Aust 2013;63:22.1–15
   Google Scholar
• Horton R, Horton K, Meyers L. Getting the literacy and language skills needed for employment: teaching is the solution. In: Conti RV, McGrath III TJ, eds. Proceedings of the 8th annual Pittsburgh conference for augmented communicators, Aug 10–12 2001. Pittsburgh (PA): Shout Press; 2001:46–51
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D, Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Paul H Brookes Publishing; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Milner P, Kelly B. Community participation and inclusion: people with disabilities defining their place. Disabil Soc 2009;24:47–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MM, Murray J. Parachute without a ripcord: the skydive of communication intervention. Augment Altern Commun 2011;27:292–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett N. Asian work choices: how AAC can liberate the user. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2010;5:236–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J. Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput Hum Behav 2008;24:1816–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker N, Tuffin K. Disability discourses and online identities. Disabil Soc 2002;17:327–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, McConachie H, Price K, Wood P. Views of young people who use augmentative and alternative communication systems. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2001;36:107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares L, Peixoto A. Late development of independent conversation skills with manual and graphic signs through joint activities. In: von Tetzchner S, Grove N, eds. Augmentative and alternative communication: developmental issues. London: Whurr Publishers; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Ballin L, Balandin S. An exploration of loneliness: communication and social networks of older people with cerebral palsy. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2007;32:315–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper L, Balandin S, Trembath D. The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augment Altern Commun 2009;25:154–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runswick-Cole K, Goodley D. Resilience: a disability studies and community psychology approach. Soc Personali Psychol Compass 2013;7:67–78
   Google Scholar
• Whitty M. Liberating or debilitating? An examination of romantic relationships, sexual relationships and friendships on the net. Comput Hum Behav 2008;24:1837–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahar A, Cobigo V, Stuart H. Conceptualizing belonging. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:1026–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynan A. How I use the Internet and online social media: experiences of young people who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) [dissertation]. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University; 2013. Available from: http://www.e-space.mmu.ac.uk/e-space/ [last accessed 22 Nov 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Hynan A, Murray J, Goldbart J. ‘Happy and excited’: perceptions of using digital technology and online social media by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Child Lang Teach Ther 2014;30:175–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar