A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity

References

• Nicholson TRJ, Cutter W, Hotopf M. Assessing mental capacity: the Mental Capacity Act. BMJ 2008;336:322–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. Available from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf [last accessed 21 Feb 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Duffield G, Worrall L. Legal decision-making by people with aphasia: critical incidents for speech pathologists. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2010;45:244–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brietzke E. Submission to the Attorney General on the need for a review of the law and practice in relation to legal capacity. Office of the Public Advocate. 2007. Available from: http://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/file/file/Research/Submissions/2007/Submission_to_the_Attorney_General.pdf. [last accessed 9 Oct 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Church M, Watts S. Assessment of mental capacity: a flow chart guide. Psychiatr Bull 2007;31:304–7.
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Attorney General’s Department. Capacity toolkit: Information for government and community workers, professionals, families and carers in New South Wales. 2008. Available from: http://www.diversityservices.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/agdbasev7wr/divserv/documents/pdf/capacity_toolkit0609.pdf [last accessed 15 Jul 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Aldous K, Tolmie R, Worrall L, Ferguson A. Speech-language pathologists’ contribution to the assessment of decision-making capacity in aphasia: a survey of common practices. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2014;16:231–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHA. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• SPA. Scope of practice in speech pathology. Melbourne, Australia: Speech Pathology Australia; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Elles J, Letts P. Making decisions: a guide for advice workers. UK: Office of the Public Guardian; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Morris K, Ferguson A, Worrall L. A qualitative study of legal and social justice needs for people with aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2014;16:541–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA. Aphasia and related cognitive-communication disorders. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus S. A systemic functional approach to misunderstandings. Bridging discourses’ online proceedings of the Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Association Conference; 2008; University of Wollongong.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong E. Clause complex relations in aphasic discourse: a longitudinal case study. J Neurolinguist 1992;7:261–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J. Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman FH. Legal-ethical considerations, restrictions, and obligations for clinicians who treat communicative disorders. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan K. Neuropsychological assessment of mental capacity. Neuropsychol Rev 2004;14:131–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huer MB, Yaniv K. Access to justice: an SLP’s guide to helping persons with complex communication needs voice their case. ASHA Lead 2006;11:6–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan JF, et al. Training volunteers as conversation partners using ‘Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia’ (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:624–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum P, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1635–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum P. Clinical practice. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1834–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader TJ, Playe SJ. Emergency medicine research consent form readability assessment. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:534–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac KM. Speech pathology in cultural and linguistic diversity. London: Whurr; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kambanaros M, van Steenbrugge W. Interpreters and language assessment: confrontation naming and interpreting. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 2004;6:247–52.
   Google Scholar
• Roger P, Code C. Lost in translation? Issues of content validity in interpreter-mediated aphasia assessments. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2011;13:61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield TM, Leff AP. Rehabilitation of hemianopia. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:36–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra L. Stroke rehabilitation 2009: old chestnuts and new insights. Stroke 2010;41:e88–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talvitie SS, Matilainen LE, Pekkonen E, et al. The effects of cortical ischemic stroke on auditory processing in humans as indexed by transient brain responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:912–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coehlo C, Sinotte MP, Duffy JR. Schuell’s stimulation approach to rehabilitation. In: Chapey R, ed. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:403–49.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall RC. Early management of Wernicke’s aphasia: a context-based approach. In: Chapey R, ed. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2008:507–29.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan D, Michaud J, Hufford R. Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain Lang 2013;127:21–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan AC. Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology 1998;12:811–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose TA, Worrall LE, McKenna KT. The effectiveness of aphasia-friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology 2003;17:947–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilegaard M, Berg Ravn H. Informed consent: towards improved lay-friendliness of patient information sheets. Commun Med 2013;10:201–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley L. Cognitive-communication abilities following brain injury: a functional approach. San Diego, CA: Singular; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins CA, Klepousniotou E, Scott AG. Nature and assessment of right hemisphere disorders. In: Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Potagas C, eds. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2013:297–344.
   Google Scholar
• Bayles KA, Tomoeda CK. Cognitive-communication disorders of dementia: definition, diagnosis and treatment. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Peach RK, (ed). Cognition and acquired language disorders: an information processing approach. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. J Commun Disord 2002;35:171–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley R. Plasticity in high-order cognition: evidence of dissociation in aphasia. Behav Brain Sci 2007;30:171–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldo JV, Dronkers NF, Wilkins D, et al. Is problem solving dependent on language? Brain Lang 2005;92:240–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mourik M, Verschaeve M, Boon P, et al. Cognition in global aphasia: indicators for therapy. Aphasiology 1992;6:491–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH. Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 2: The coloured progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT): examiner’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, et al. Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Odessa, FL: PAR; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Keil K, Kaszniak A. Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: a review. Aphasiology 2002;16:305–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotrena C, Branco LD, Zimmerman N, et al. Impaired decision-making after traumatic brain injury: the Iowa gambling task. Brain Inj 2014;28:1070–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Worrall L, McPhee J, et al. Testamentary capacity and aphasia: A descriptive case report with implications for clinical practice. Aphasiology 2003;17:965–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shames GH. Counselling the communicatively disabled and their families: a manual for clinicians. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Iverach L, Jones M, O’Brian S, et al. The relationship between mental health disorders and treatment outcomes among adults who stutter. J Fluency Disord 2009;34:29–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloviita T, Leppanen M, Ojalammi U. Authorship in facilitated communication: an analysis of 11 cases. Augment Altern Commun 2014;1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. Social and life participation approaches to aphasia intervention. In: LaPointe L, ed. Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. New York, NY: Thieme; 2005:39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rautakoski P. Training total communication. Aphasiology 2011;25:344–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn LB, Alici Y. Ethical waves of the silver tsunami: consent, capacity, and surrogate decision-making. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;21:309–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moye J, Sabatino CP, Weintraub Brendel R. Evaluation of the capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;21:326–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland A, McDonald L. Evaluation of social work communication skills to allow people with aphasia to be part of the decision-making process in healthcare. Social Work Educ 2008;28:128–44.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan J, Channell K, McDowell D, Sharma AK. Improving patient and carer communication, multidisciplinary team working and goal-setting in stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:194–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson A, Worrall L, Sherratt S. The impact of communication disability on interdisciplinary discussion in rehabilitation case conferences. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:1795–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassassi S, Bianchi Y, Stiefel F, Waeber G. Assessment of the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to acute medical wards. BMC Med Ethics 2009;10:15. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-10-15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright J, Franklin D, Forman D, Freegard H. Promoting collaborative dementia care via online interprofessional education. Australas J Ageing 2015;34:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisenberg T, McBride KE. Aphasia: a clinical and psychological study. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 1935.
   Google Scholar