Opiate and crack cocaine use: A new understanding of prevalence

References

• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV, (4th ed). APA, Washington DC 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bello P-Y, Chene G. A capture–recapture study to estimate the size of the addict population in Toulouse, France. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in Europe. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs & Drug Addiction, Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1997
   Google Scholar
• Beynon C, Bellis MA, Millar T, Meier P, Thomson R, Jones KM. Hidden need for drug treatment services: Measuring levels of problematic drug use in the North West of England. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2001; 23: 286–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brugha RF, Swan AV, Hayhurst GK, Fallon MP. A drug misuser prevalence study in a rural English district. European Journal of Public Health 1998; 8: 34–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buster MCA, van Brussel GHA, van den Brink W. Estimating the number of opiate users in Amsterdam by capture recapture: The importance of case definition. European Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 17: 935–942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins RF, Aktan GB. Estimation of heroin prevalence in Michigan using capture–recapture and heroin problem index methods. Journal of Drug Issues 2000; 30: 187–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YH, Comiskey CM. Methods for providing the first prevalence estimates of opiate use in Western Australia. The International Journal of Drug Policy 2003; 14: 297–305
   Google Scholar
• Comiskey CM, Barry JM. A capture–recapture study of the prevalence and implications of opiate use in Dublin. European Journal of Public Health 2001; 11: 198–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack RM. Problems with using capture–recapture in epidemiology: An example of a measles epidemic. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1999; 52: 909–914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AG, Cormack RM, Richardson AM. Estimation of injecting drug users in the City of Edinburgh, Scotland, and number infected with human immunodeficiency virus. International Journal of Epidemiology 1999; 28: 117–121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo-Salvany A, Hartnoll RL, Maguire A, Brugal MT, Albertin P, Cayla JA, et al. Analytical considerations in the use of capture–recapture to estimate prevalence: Case studies of the estimation of opiate use in the metropolitan area of Barcelona, Spain. American Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 148: 732–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs, & Drug Addiction. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1997
   Google Scholar
• Frischer M, Heatlie H, Hickman M. Prevalence of problematic and injecting drug use for Drug Action Team areas in England. Journal of Public Health 2006; 28: 3–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischer M, Heatlie H, Hickman M. Validating estimates of problematic drug use in England. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frischer M, Hickman M, Kraus L, Mariani F, Wiessing L. A comparison of different methods for estimating the prevalence of problematic drug misuse in Great Britain. Addiction 2001; 96: 1465–1476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischer M, Leyland A, Cormack R, Goldberg DJ, Bloor M, Green ST, et al. Estimating the population prevalence of injection drug use and infection with human immunodeficiency virus among injection drug users in Glasgow, Scotland. American Journal of Epidemiology 1993; 138: 170–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemmell I, Millar T, Hay G. Capture–recapture estimates of problem drug use and the use of simulation based confidence intervals in a stratified analyses. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004; 58: 758–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey C, Eaton G, McDougall C, Culyer A. The economic and social costs of Class A drug use in England and Wales. Home Office, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Hartnoll R, Mitcheson M, Lewis R, Bryer S. Estimating the prevalence of opioid dependence. Lancet 1985; 1: 203–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay G. Capture–recapture estimates of drug misuse in urban and non urban settings in the north east of Scotland. Addiction 2000; 95: 1795–1803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay G, Gannon M, MacDougal J, Millar T, Eastwood C, McKeganey N. Local and national estimates of the prevalence of opiate use and/or crack cocaine use. Measuring different aspects of problem drug use: Methodological developments, N Singleton, R Murray, L Tinsley. Home Office, London 2006; 3–40
   Google Scholar
• Hay G, McKeganey N. Estimating the prevalence of drug misuse in Dundee, Scotland: An application of capture–recapture methods. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1996; 50: 469–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay G, McKeganey N, Hutchinson S. Estimating the national and local prevalence of problem drug misuse in Scotland. University of Glasgow and Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health, Glasgow, UK 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hickman M, Cox S, Harvey J, Howes S, Farrell M, Frischer M, et al. Estimating the prevalence of problem drug use in inner London: A discussion of three capture–recapture studies. Addiction 1999; 94: 1653–1662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman M, Higgins V, Hope V, Bellis M, Tilling K, Walker A, et al. Injecting drug use in Brighton, Liverpool, and London: best estimates of prevalence and coverage of public health indicators. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2004; 58: 766–771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland R, Vivancos R, Maskrey V, Sadler J, Rumball D, Harvey I, et al. The prevalence of problem drug misuse in a rural county of England. Journal of Public Health 2006; 28: 88–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook EB, Regal RR. Validity of methods for model selection, weighting for model uncertainty, and small sample adjustment in capture–recapture estimation. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 145: 1138–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope VD, Hickman M, Tilling K. Capturing crack cocaine use: Estimating the prevalence of crack cocaine use in London using capture–recapture with covariates. Addiction 2005; 100: 1701–1708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser YI. Population estimation of illicit drug users in Los Angeles County. Journal of Drug Issues 1993; 23: 323–334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson S, Bird S, Taylor A, Goldberg D. Estimating the prevalence, incidence and cessation of injecting drug use in Glasgow 1960–2000: Combining expert opinion with capture–recapture prevalence data. International Journal of Drug Policy 2006; 17(1)29–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson A, Stevens A, Wardlaw G. Indirect estimates of hidden populations—Capture–recapture methods to estimate the numbers of heroin users in the Australian Capital Territory. Social Science & Medicine 1994; 39: 823–831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastro TD, Kitayaporn D, Weniger BG, Vanichseni S, Laosunthorn V, Uneklabh T, et al. Estimating the number of HIV-infected injection drug users in Bangkok—A capture–recapture method. American Journal of Public Health 1994; 84: 1094–1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElrath K. Prevalence of problem heroin use in Northern Ireland. Queen's University, Belfast, UK 2002
   Google Scholar
• Millar T, Gemmell I, Hay G, Donmall M. The dynamics of drug misuse: Assessing changes in prevalence. Home Office, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Millar T, Gemmell I, Hay G, Heller RF, Donmall M. How well do trends in incidence of heroin use reflect hypothesised trends in prevalence of problem drug use in the North West of England?. Addiction Research & Theory 2006; 14: 537–549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse. Target to treat more drug users achieved two years early 2006, (Available at: http://www.nta.nhs.uk/media/media_releases/2006_media_releases/target_to_treat_more_drug_users_achieved_two_yearss_early_290906.aspx–Date last accessed 27 February 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Platt L, Hickman M, Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Karavashkin V, Vlasov A, et al. The prevalence of injecting drug use in a Russian city: Implications for harm reduction and coverage. Addiction 2004; 99: 1430–1438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe S, Man L. Drug misuse declared: Findings from the 2005/06 British Crime Survey. Home Office, London 2006
   Google Scholar
• Squires NF, Beeching NJ, Schlecht BJM, Ruben SM. An estimate of the prevalence of drug misuse in Liverpool and a spatial-analysis of known addiction. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1995; 17: 103–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickens TD. Quantitative methods for estimating the size of a drug-using population. Journal of Drug Issues 1993; 23: 185–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood F, Bloor M, Palmer S. Indirect prevalence estimates of a national drug using population: The use of contact-recontact methods in Wales. Health Risk & Society 2000; 2: 47–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar