The impact of positive and negative ecstasy-related information on ecstasy use among college students: Results of a longitudinal study

References

• Arria AM, Caldeira KM, O'Grady KE, Vincent KB, Fitzelle DB, Johnson EP. (in press). Drug exposure opportunities and use patterns among college students: Results of a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Substance Abuse, 29: 19–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman JG, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM. Explaining recent increases in students marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval 1976–1996. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88: 887–892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggott M, Heifets B, Jones RT, Mendelson J, Sferios E, Zehnder J. Chemical analysis of ecstasy pills. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 284: 2190–2190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia G, Yeh SY, De Souza EB. MDMA-induced neurotoxicity: Parameters of degeneration and recovery of brain serotonin neurons. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 1988; 29: 269–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogenschutz M. Drug information libraries on the internet. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2000; 32: 249–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolla KI, McCann UD, Ricaurte GA. Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA (“ecstasy”) users. Neurology 1998; 51: 1532–1537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer E, Shannon M, Hibberd P. Web sites with misinformation about illicit drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 469–471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson RG, Falck RS, McCaughan JA, Siegal HA. MDMA/Ecstasy use among young people in Ohio: Perceived risk and barriers to intervention. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2004; 36: 181–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers RA, Taylor JR, Potenza MN. Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 106: 1041–1052
   Google Scholar
• Community Epidemiology Work Group. Epidemiologic trends in drug abuse, volume 1: Highlights & executive summary. 2000, (Retrieved 2 December 2004) http://www.drugabuse.gov/PDF/CEWG/CEWG1200.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drug Abuse Warning Network. Emergency department trends from DAWN: Final estimates 1995–2002. 2003, (Retrieved 22 December 2004) http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/old_dawn/pubs_94_02/edpubs/2002final/
   Google Scholar
• Duistman DM, Colbry SL. Perceived risk and use as predictors of substance use among college students. Health Values: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education & Promotion 1995; 19: 44–52
   Google Scholar
• Falck RS, Carlson RG, Wang J, Siegal HA. Sources of information about MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine): Perceived accuracy, importance, and implications for prevention among young adult users. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 2004; 74: 45–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freese TE, Miotto K, Reback CJ. The effects and consequences of selected club drugs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2002; 23: 151–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamma A, Jerome L, Liechti ME, Sumnall HR. Is ecstasy perceived to be safe? A critical survey. Drug & Alcohol Dependence 2005; 77: 185–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez GM, Haney ML. Perceptions of risk as predictors of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use among college students. Journal of College Student Development 1990; 31: 313–318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzidimitriou G, McCann UD, Ricaurte GA. Altered serotonin innervation patterns in the forebrain of monkeys treated with (+/−)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine seven years previously: Factors influencing abnormal recovery. The Journal of Neuroscience 1999; 19: 5096–5107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman-Stahl MA, Krebs CP, Kroutil LA, Heller DC. Risk and protective factors for methamphetamine use and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among young adults aged 18 to 25. Addictive Behaviors 2007; 32: 1003–1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG. Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2000. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD 2001
   Google Scholar
• Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg J. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19–45 2005, (Retrieved 26 September 2006) http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/vol2_2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg J. Monitoring the Future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings 2005. 2006, (Retrieved 5 July 2006) http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/overview2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG. Monitoring the Future: National results on adolescent drug use. Overview of key findings, 2003. University of Michigan Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI 2004
   Google Scholar
• Joseph M. Ecstasy: Its history and lore. Carlton Books, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Kellam SG, van Horn YV. Life course development, community epidemiology, and preventive trials: A scientific structure. American Journal of Community Psychology 1997; 25: 177–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly B. Conceptions of risk in the lives of club drug-using youth. Substance Use & Misuse 2005; 40: 1443–1459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy KB, O'Grady KE, Wish ED, Arria AM. An in-depth qualitative examination of the ecstasy experience: Results of a focus group with ecstasy-using college students. Substance Use & Misuse 2005; 40: 1427–1441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets VL. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 2002; 7: 83–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann UD, Mertl M, Eligulashvili V, Ricaurte GA. Cognitive performance in (±) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ‘Ecstasy’) users: A controlled study. Psychopharmacology 1999; 143: 417–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann UD, Szabo Z, Scheffel U, Dannals RF, Ricaurte GA. Positron emission tomographic evidence of toxic effect of MDMA (‘Ecstasy’) on brain serotonin neurons in human beings. Lancet 1998; 352: 1433–1437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PN, Wareing M, Fisk JE. Users' perceptions of the risks and effects of taking ecstasy (MDMA): A questionnaire study. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2006; 20: 447–455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Cocaine abuse and addiction. Research Report Series. 1999, (Retrieved 5 August 2005) http://www.streetdrugs.org/pdf/RRCocaine.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Ecstasy: What we know and don’t know about MDMA: A Scientific Review. Bethesda, , MD 2001
   Google Scholar
• Oetting ER, Beauvais F. Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990; 58: 385–394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmgreen P, Donohew L. Effective mass media strategies for drug abuse prevention campaigns. Handbook of Drug Abuse Prevention: Theory, Science, & Practice, Z Sloboda, WJ Bukoski. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York 2003; 27–43
   Google Scholar
• Palmgreen P, Donohew L, Lorch EP, Rogus M. Sensation seeking, message sensation value, and drug use as mediators of PSA effectiveness. Health Communication 1991; 3: 217–227
   Google Scholar
• Reyna VF, Farley F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006; 7: 1–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricaurte GA, Jie Y, Hatzidimitriou G, Cord BJ, McCann UD. Severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity in primates after a common recreational dose regimen of MDMA ('Ecstasy’). Science 2002; 297: 2260–2263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2001 National Household Survey on Abuse: Volume I. Summary of National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NHSDA Series H-17, DHHS Publication No. SMA 02–3758). 2002, (Retrieved 26 September 2006) http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k1nhsda/PDF/cover.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Questionnaire. 2003, (Retrieved 26 September 2006) http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2MRB/2k2CAISpecs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-30, DHHS Publication No. SMA 06–4194). 2006, (Retrieved 26 September 2006) http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NSDUH/2k5nsduh/tabs/2k5Tabs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. 2007, http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/nsduh/2k6nsduh/2k6Results.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vincent KB. The ecstasy and methamphetamine drug epidemics: Implications for policy and control. Unpublished Thesis. University of Maryland, College Park, MD 2005
   Google Scholar
• Zickler P. NIDA launches initiative to combat club drugs. NIDA Notes 1999; 14: 2p
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M. Zuckerman–Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ): An alternative five-factorial model. Big Five Assessment, B de Raad, M Perugini. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle 2002; 377–396
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M, Kolin EA, Price L, Zoob I. Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology 1964; 28: 477–482
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuckerman M, Neary RS, Brustman BA. Sensation-Seeking Scale correlates in experience (smoking, drugs, alcohol, ‘hallucinations,’ and sex) and preference for complexity (designs). Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5. 1970; 317–318
   Google Scholar