How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groups

References

• ACMD. What recovery outcomes does the evidence tell us we can expect? Second report of the Recovery Committee. Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, London 2013
   Google Scholar
• Alakeson V. Putting service users in control: The case for extending self-direction into the NHS. Social Market Foundation, London 2007
   Google Scholar
• Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1993; 16: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Best D. Groshkova, T., McCartney, D., Bamber, S., & Livingston, W. 2009, The politics of hope. Recovery debate. Druglink, November/December 20–21
   Google Scholar
• Betty Ford Institute. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007; 33: 221–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns S, MacKeith J. Drug and alcohol star. Triangle Consulting Social Enterprise Limited, Brighton 2012
   Google Scholar
• Carr S. Personalisation: A rough guiderevised 2nd. Social Care Institute for Excellence, London 2010
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph RO, Sangster Y, Keck L. Examining the factor structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2004; 30: 1035–1041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critcher C, Gladstone B. Utilizing the Delphi technique in policy discussion: A case study of a privatized utility in Britain. Public Administration 1998; 76: 431–450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan PE. Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 1988; 11: 11–19
   Google Scholar
• Duke K, Herring R, Thickett A, Thom B. Substitution treatment in the era of ‘recovery’: An analysis of stakeholder roles and policy windows in Britain. Substance Use and Misuse 2013; 48: 966–976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmer O. Problems in futures research: Delphi and causal cross-impact analysis. Futures 1977; 9: 17–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. Drug strategy 2010: ‘Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live drug free life’. HM Government, London 2010
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson N, Curtis L. Recovery as policy in mental health services: Strategies emerging from the States. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 2000; 23: 333–341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311: 376–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F. The Delphi technique in nursing and health research. Wiley-Blackwell Sons Ltd, Oxford 2011
   Google Scholar
• Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1975
   Google Scholar
• Mullen PM. Delphi: Myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2003; 17: 37–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neale J, Pickering L, Nettleton S. The everyday lives of recovering heroin users. Royal Society of Arts, London 2012
   Google Scholar
• Neale J, Nettleton S, Pickering L. Does recovery-oriented treatment prompt heroin users prematurely into detoxification and abstinence programmes? Qualitative study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2013; 127: 163–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Nettleton S, Pickering L. Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Drug Policy 2014; 25: 3–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paylor I, Measham F, Asher A. Social work and drug use. Open University Press, Maidenhead 2012
   Google Scholar
• Recovery Orientated Drug Treatment Expert Group. Medications in recovery: Re-orientating drug dependence treatment. National Drug Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, London 2012
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. (2011). SAMHSA's definition and guiding principles of recovery – Answering the call for feedback. Retrieved 8 September 2013, from SAMHSA. Website: http://blog.samhsa.gov/2011/12/22/samhsa%E2%80%99s-definition-and-guiding-principles-of-recovery-%E2%80%93-answering-the-call-for-feedback
   Google Scholar
• Scheyett A, DeLuca J, Morgan C. Recovery in severe mental illnesses: A literature review of recovery measures. Social Work Research: A Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 2013; 37: 286–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. The road to recovery: A new approach to tackling Scotland's drug problem. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh 2008
   Google Scholar
• Skills for Health. (2009). Scoping for personalization. Retrieved 24 February 2014, from Skills for Health. Website: http://www.skillsforhealth.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Thom B. Women in recovery. Tackling addiction. Pathways to recovery (Chap. 4, pp. 52–69), R Yates, MS Malloch. Jessica Kingsley, London 2010
   Google Scholar
• Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 1970; 2: 149–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group. The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group. A vision of recovery. UKDPC, London 2008
   Google Scholar